Hi iamlamad,
Oh, I see. Well, fortunately or unfortunately, depending on one's understanding on this, I don't have an LAV so I guess I won't be able to understand the truth. While I'm thoroughly convinced that it is your understanding of Paul's intended meaning, the question still remains: Is it the correct understanding?
...
Concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered to him, we ask you, brothers, not to become easily unsettled or alarmed by some prophecy, report or letter supposed to have come from us, saying that the day of the Lord has already come. Don't let anyone deceive you in any way, for [that day will not come] until the rebellion occurs and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the man doomed to destruction. He will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God's temple, proclaiming himself to be God. Don't you remember that when I was with you I used to tell you these things? And now you know what is holding him back, so that he may be revealed at the proper time. For the secret power of lawlessness is already at work; but the one who now holds it back will continue to do so till he is taken out of the way. And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will overthrow with the breath of his mouth and destroy by the splendor of his coming. The coming of the lawless one will be in accordance with the work of Satan displayed in all kinds of counterfeit miracles, signs and wonders, and in every sort of evil that deceives those who are perishing. They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie and so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness.
...
God bless you.
In Christ, Ted
Ted, this is a passage that will not be understood with a first reading.
First we must understand that what Paul actually wrote was:
3Let no man deceive you by any means: for - except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition"
Most translators added some text - and we can only guess that their added text was Paul's meaning. In fact, I suspect it is. They tipically add: "that Day will not come". WHAT day? What day did Paul just mention? From your text: "
the day of the Lord has already come" So Paul was referring back to the "Day of the Lord." However, some Greek texts have it as "the Day of Christ." Which is correct? We don't know. Neither do we know, in Paul's mind, if there was a difference. Already we can see that this text is really ambiguous and not the best text for doctrine.
Next, we MUST understand that the THEME of this passage is the gathering.
(Amplified) 1 BUT RELATIVE to
the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ (the Messiah) and
our gathering together to [meet] Him, we beg you, brethren,
Therefore, the CORRECT theory of what Paul is telling us MUST include the gathering.
Now let's get into verse 3:
I like NASB.
"IT" that is the day of the Lord
"Will NOT COME Unless the apostasy comes first," so that the man of sin can be revealed.
But the real question here is, what did Paul mean by the Greek word "Apostasia?" Many people puzzle over it, yet there is no need, because in three parallel verses Paul clearly tells us. Notice in this very verse, SOMETHING must occur FIRST, before the man of sin can be revealed. Look VERY CLOSE: only ONE THING comes FIRST:
3 Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the falling away comes first, (KJV)
3 Let no one deceive you in any way. For that day will not come, unless the rebellion comes first (ESV)
3 Let no one in any way deceive you, for it will not come unless the apostasy comes first (NASB)
3 Don't let anyone deceive you in any way. For that day will not come unless the apostasy comes first (HCSB)
3 let no man beguile you in any wise: for it will not be, except the falling away come first (ASV)
3 Let no man deceive you by any means, for unless there come a revolt first (DRB)
3 let not any one deceive you in any manner, because -- if the falling away may not come first (YLT)
So there is only ONE THING that must come first. And that one thing is hidden in Paul's use of the word Apostasia. Then, AFTER that one thing, the apostasia, then the man of sin can be revealed.
Now verse 6:
And now you know what is holding him back, so that he may be revealed at the proper time.
Notice:
(NIV)6 And now you know what is holding him back, so that he may be revealed at the proper time.
(NASB) 6 And you know what restrains him now, so that in his time he will be revealed.
(ESV) 6 And you know what is restraining him now so that he may be revealed in his time.
(ASV) 6 And now ye know that which restraineth, to the end that he may be revealed in his own season.
(HCSB) 6 And you know what currently restrains [him], so that he will be revealed in his time.
(Young's Literal) 6 and now, what is keeping down ye have known, for his being revealed in his own time,
(Peshitta - Lamsa) 6 And now you know what has prevented him from being revealed in his time.
A beginning reader could understand the two parts to this sentence: first, there is something holding back, restraining, holding down, the man of sin from being revealed, and then at the proper time he will be revealed. After reading this we are SUPPOSE TO KNOW who and what the restrainer is, who or what is holding him back, and preventing him from being revealed until his time, for Paul wrote, "and NOW you know."
Paul wanted us to KNOW so much, he basically wrote it yet again. Something is restraining or holding back, until such time as the restraining is removed or taken out of the way, and THEN the man of sin will be removed.
(ASV)7 For the mystery of lawlessness doth already work: only [there is] one that restraineth now, until he be taken out of the way.
8 And then shall be revealed the lawless one, ...
(NASB) 7 For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only he who now restrains will do so until he is taken out of the way.
8 Then that lawless one will be revealed ...
(Green's Literal) For the mystery of lawlessness already is working, only he is holding back now, until it comes out of the midst.
8 And then "the Lawless One" will be revealed, ...
(Peshitta - Lamsa) 7 For the mystery of iniquity is already at work: until he who now is the obstacle be taken out of the way.
8 Then shall the Wicked be exposed, ...
(The Emphasized Bible) 7 For, the secret, of lawlessness, already, is inwardly working itself, - only, until, he that restraineth at present, shall be gone, out of the midst:
8 And, then, shall be revealed the lawless one,
Again, ANY beginning reader would be able to understand that the restraining force or the one holding back or the one being an obstacle to the revealing, is going to be taken out of the way, removed, gone out of the midst. And AFTER that happens, THEN the man of sin can and will be revealed.
Verses 6-8 are written in simple language, easy to understand. It is written very plainly, and all translations give us the same idea. Now we have seen many times in a row with the different translations, that there is a restraining force holding the man of sin down, and PREVENTING his revealing. And we know that the restrainer will be taken out of the way, or removed, or departed out of the midst FIRST, BEFORE the man of sin can be revealed.
Now, back to us KNOWING: Paul wrote "And NOW YOU KNOW."
WHY did Paul write this? Because HE JUST TOLD US who the restrainer was. He wrote: "And Now You Know," in verse 6, so if we back up verse by verse and look for something "taken out of the way," we will KNOW - beyond any doubt - WHO the restrainer is.
WE find NOTHING "taken out of the way" in verse 5, nothing in verse 4. But consider verse 3: I used your own verse, but modified it by using the Greek word and added "first":
Don't let anyone deceive you in any way, for [that day will not come] until the [apostasia] occurs [first] and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the man doomed to destruction.
Notice this verse carefully, then answer the question: is the man of sin revealed at the end of this verse? Most certainly he is!
"IS revealed." Check this out in many other translations: many say the same thing: after verse 3a is finished, then in 3b the man if sin IS REVEALED and Paul goes on to say what he will do when he is revealed.
Therefore simple logic tells us that in the first part of this verse the one restraining is "TAKEN OUT OF THE WAY." It can be no other way, for Paul told is twice, once in verse 6 and again in verses 7 & 8 that the man of sin cannot be revealed until the one restraining is taken out of the way, yet in 3b he is certainly now revealed.
Remember, we have just seen many times the restrainer mentioned, then the man of sin revealed in different translations. We have seen several times the restrainer mentioned, and then the restrainer REMOVED, DEPARTED and then the man of sin revealed. We know that the revealing CANNOT HAPPEN until the restrainer or holder downer, is GONE out of the midst or taken out of the way.
Here is where Paul TELLS US WHO.
"Let no one in any way deceive you, for it will not come unless the apostasia comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction"
Now, we have just seen many verses telling us what must come first: it is the REMOVAL or DEPARTURE of the one restraining. Therefore, this word "apostasia" MUST carry the meaning of something "taken out of the way," or something departed or something gone out of the midst. Now, look again at one of the FIRST English translations:
Geneva Bible: 1587
3 Let no man deceiue you by any meanes: for that day shall not come, except there come a departing first, and that that man of sinne be disclosed, euen the sonne of perdition,
This translation fits PERFECTLY with all the previous verses shown in MANY translations. It tells us WHAT or WHO is removed out of the way, or taken out of the midst. It is the GATHERING, the rapture of the church.
Therefore, DON'T EVER think we don't know who the restrainer is, for Paul wrote, AND NOW YOU KNOW!
We could also say it this way:
Verses 3-5 above provide a description of the order of events:
1. The removal of the Church
2. The revealing of the antichrist
3. The antichrist presenting himself as God
And then again in verses 6-8:
1. The Church is holding the antichrist back, though he is still at work now
2. He is to be revealed in the right time
3. The One who holds him back (the Church) is taken out of the way
4. The lawless one (antichrist) is revealed
5. The Lord returns to destroy the antichrist (Second Coming)
When using the word "departing" in verse 3 above, the subsequent verses coincide and restate the same events. We have three similar statements on the removal of the Church first, and then the revealing of the antichrist.
Paul speaks of the day of the Lord, giving two signs to look for to KNOW one is IN the day of the Lord. We know from other scriptures that the man of sin will be revealed for who he really is, at the abomination - right? Well, that is well INTO the day of the Lord. So we can say that is one of Paul's two events that MUST take place: To know for sure that the day of the Lord has come, the man of son MUST be revealed, i.e., the abomination must have taken place.
BUT WAIT: Paul ALSO said that there is something RESTRAINING or holding back the Antichrist, PREVENTING him from being revealed:
2 Thes 2 (NASB)
7For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only he who now restrains will do so until he is taken out of the way.
8Then that lawless one will be revealed....
So we KNOW that the abomination cannot happen until the one who restrains is TAKEN OUT OF THE WAY.
In fact, Paul has three parallel verses, where something is happening and then the Antichrist is revealed: Verses 7 and 8 are one of them;
3) verses 7-8: restrainer removed;
THEN the lawless one will be revealed
2) Verse 6: And you know what restrains him now,
so that in his time he will be revealed
1) Verse 3: ... if the [apostasia]* may not come first,
and the man of sin be revealed...
Take a CLOSE look at these three parallel sentences: YOu see the revealing is the second part of each - right?
In verses 7-8 and in verse 6, the first part of the verse is the restrainer.
Would it not make GOOD SENSE then, that the word "Apostasia" must then also be speaking of the restrainer? Indeed, it certainly is.
Now notice how Paul started his verse 6 (NKJV)
6 And now you know what is restraining,
WAIT!!! HOW would we know? Why would Paul write, "NOW YOU KNOW?" Well, one good reason to write these words is that PAUL JUST TOLD US! The answer is in verse three. THAT IS WHERE Paul told us WHO the restrainer is. It is one of our parallel verses: (NKJV)
3 Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the [apostasia]* comes first, and the man of sin is revealed,
*I replaced the other words with the Greek word they were translated from, because they tend to confuse what Paul was really saying:
Paul is telling us plainly that the restrainer, the one who will be "taken out of the way" or removed, is IN that word, Apostasia. Now, read that same verse the way the first English translations wrote it:
Geneva Bible:
Let no man deceiue you by any meanes: for that day shall not come, except there come a departing first, and that that man of sinne be disclosed, euen the sonne of perdition,
Is a "departing" a "taking out of the way?" In my mind it certainly is.
We MUST NOT forget, the THEME of this whole passage was the "gathering!" So this fits the theme perfectly. Paul is telling us that the departure (the gathering) MUST come first, removing the restraining force, and THEN the man of sin can be revealed.
If we examine the Greek compound word "apostasia" it can most certainly mean some people removed from the whole from where they were "standing" (Greek stasia - where we get "stationary" as in an engine not moving) and taken somewhere else.
It is either this, or one must conclude that a falling away allows the man of sin to be revealed. This does not agree very well with "taken out of the way." However, the rapture agrees perfectly with something "taken out of the way."
LAMAD