Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You are free to support your claims with data and majority opinion if you wish.
Majority opinion isn't evidence which would support a theory when opinions themselves aren't relevant for the theory to work or fail (basically, a bunch of people believing something is true doesn't make it more likely to be true necessarily).
True. Perhaps his entire family has faith in the tooth fairy.
I'm willing to allow for nurture as a source of beliefs without
too much criticism. I don't know his age.
I am talking about man and animals adapting and evolving rapidly. That is painful to a dogma of present state evolution as the creation engine!You have no idea what you are talking about and your ignorance is painful.
On the contrary, your explanations opposes themselves. One minute you admit worm sex could have resulted in you, the next it can't be the flatworm sex, it had to be some imaginary ancestor. You have no clue. Stop pretending, it is painful.Again, you have no idea what you are talking about and you are also not paying attention to what I am saying, because I have already explained this to you. I can only conclude that you are being deliberately stubborn.
?? What exists? A first life form you dreamed up because you need one? It doesn't exist! This is news?Your ignorance of it does not mean it doesn't exist.
Get a grip, you need to learn. Obviously.In fact, given that you have shown zero interest in learning about these things, I'd say there is likely a great deal about science that you are ignorant of.
Yes. You may have the fruit wrong, but this state exists because of sin. Petrol burning pollutes and hurts, and is entirely a product of this state and nature. How much did they burn in Noah's day? You think God drove Adam and Eve from the garden in s CAR???So petrol burns because Eve ate an apple.
I am talking about man and animals adapting and evolving rapidly. That is painful to a dogma of present state evolution as the creation engine!
On the contrary, your explanations opposes themselves. One minute you admit worm sex could have resulted in you, the next it can't be the flatworm sex, it had to be some imaginary ancestor. You have no clue. Stop pretending, it is painful.
?? What exists? A first life form you dreamed up because you need one? It doesn't exist! This is news?
Get a grip, you need to learn. Obviously.
Yes. You may have the fruit wrong, but this state exists because of sin. Petrol burning pollutes and hurts, and is entirely a product of this state and nature. How much did they burn in Noah's day? You think God drove Adam and Eve from the garden in s CAR???
If all you have is majority opinion what do you do? if they had evidence they would not need any opinions.Just know that a lot of people thinking something is true isn't a valid support for anything.
It take years and years of practise.Honestly, my mind is boggling. I have no idea how anyone can actually believe this...
Science has no evidence for the evolution of man from bacteria or whatever little stuff they claim it started with! I have the bible account of life and where it started, supported by every miracle and prophesy that ever happened.No it's not. Since you have ZERO evidence, it is laughable, not painful.
Try to explain what worm or whatever had sex that may have resulted in you? No flatworm you think? Spit it out.Your lack of comprehension does not invalidate science.
Name anything around the time of the first life form that 'works beautifully'!!!?? That is delusional.You have no idea what science is, but you argue against it anyway, despite the fact that it works beautifully,
and you also think that fossil fuels wouldn't exist if Eve hadn't been a naughty girl.
Name anything around the time of the first life form that 'works beautifully'!!!?? That is delusional.
Science has no evidence for the evolution of man from bacteria or whatever little stuff they claim it started with! I have the bible account of life and where it started, supported by every miracle and prophesy that ever happened.
Try to explain what worm or whatever had sex that may have resulted in you? No flatworm you think? Spit it out.
Name anything around the time of the first life form that 'works beautifully'!!!?? That is delusional.
Right. nor this state where they work. Even if they could have been abused, they would not have been. Just as Cain misused a club or whatever he clobbered Able with.
Your mind needs boggling something fierce.
Do you argue against Islam? Judaism? I Ching? Taoism? Heaven's Gate? Aum Shinrikyo? anchovy pizza?I mean, at least I decided to read the Bible and find out what Christianity actually was before I started arguing against it.
She's talking mostly to Americans so would good would that do? it's Christianity that's making America look foolish not Islam? Judaism? I Ching? Taoism? Heaven's Gate? Aum Shinrikyo? or anchovy pizza?Do you argue against Islam? Judaism? I Ching? Taoism? Heaven's Gate? Aum Shinrikyo? anchovy pizza?
If so, you must be one educated lady.
What are you currently studying?
It might add some credibility to her point.She's talking mostly to Americans so would good would that do?
It might add some credibility to her point.
But I have a feeling she doesn't walk her talk.
I personally don't know Chuck about evolution.
Yet I rail against it, because I believe in evolution's antithesis ... instant creation.
Therefore, I don't have to know anything about evolution; and in fact, a child should be able to say evolution is wrong.
It might add some credibility to her point.
But I have a feeling she doesn't walk her talk.
I personally don't know Chuck about evolution.
Yet I rail against it, because I believe in evolution's antithesis ... instant creation.
Therefore, I don't have to know anything about evolution; and in fact, a child should be able to say evolution is wrong.
Your phone's ringing.... a child should ...
A child could ...
Even Occam's razor is on my side.If your goal is to convince people that evolution is wrong, doesn't it make sense to actually know what you're talking about? Or at least attempt to do so?
I agree, it's much easier to read the Bible and remain ignorant of such things,Even Occam's razor is on my side.
If I'm holding an apple in my hand and ten people come by and saying I'm holding ten different things (grape, orange, lemon, etc.) ... it's simple physics ... they're all wrong.
So evolution, SN1987A, ten different pangaeas, fifteen different ice ages, and everything else that evidences deep time can all do one thing:
Take a hike.
Your phone's ringing.
I agree, it's much easier to read the Bible and remain ignorant of such things,
there is no one happier in this world than an idiot sat in the corner grinning and sucking his thumb.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?