Not to mention that the beings that made up the "corrupted" flesh that had thoughts that were " continually evil all the time" would have just walked away as well.Hello Joshua. But Noah would still need to 'walk the animals' from their habitat physically on to the Ark. if God brought them to the Ark, or had them migrate to the Ark, then he could have just as easily brought them or had them migrate out of the 'Persian Gulf'. If Noah were trying to save the animals that were unique to the 'Persian Gulf', those not found a hundred miles distant in areas untouched by the flood, why build an Ark large enough to accomodate so many more?
Animals sense danger and move, from a volcanic erruption or forest fire for example. From a local flood the whole Ark idea is redundant. You would not need to walk them, they would be escaping danger themselves. The Ark is necessary because there is no dry ground anywhere for them to escape to, a global flood.
As the bible says:
I am going to bring floodwaters on the earth to destroy all life under the heavens, every creature that has the breath of life in it. Everything on earth will perish (Gen 6:17)
Not just the Gulf creatures, everything on earth.
God Bless
God says that every creature that breathed from a nostril... was killed... except for those on the ark.
Anyone out there, who calls themselves a christian, doubt that?
Upvote
0
