chilehed
Veteran
So you agree that passage explicitly speaks of a process which occurs after death, in which one may suffer loss and yet be saved; that there is no suffering or loss in heaven, so this process cannot be taking place in heaven; and that there is no escape from hell, so it can't be happening in hell either.I'm saying that even if we agree that it speaks of something that relates to the afterlife, it's far from being a proof of the existence of a Purgatory.
And yet you disagree that therefore there is a third state, in which this purging of the works of wood, hay and straw takes place, and only those bound for heaven enter this third state.
What other conclusion is possible?
Upvote
0