• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Prove to me that there was a great apostasy

Status
Not open for further replies.

CorTortilla

I love COFFEE!!~~
Jun 27, 2005
530
28
Home of the Bucks-Ohio
✟23,318.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
While history says otherwise. Show me writings from early church Fathers before 570 A.D. (Thats when the apostasy supposedly happened) that support Mormon Doctrine.

If you can show me examples of the early Catholic church writings talkoing about...

1. becoming gods,

2. That Adam was God, and that God was a man on another planet,

3. That there are many gods

4. That God has a body of flesh and bones and that Jehovah, YHWH, and the Holy Ghost are three seperate Gods

5. And more of Mormonism unusual doctrines

Then I will convert to Mormonism.
 
B

buddy mack

Guest
CoreyZallow said:
While history says otherwise. Show me writings from early church Fathers before 570 A.D. (Thats when the apostasy supposedly happened) that support Mormon Doctrine.

If you can show me examples of the early Catholic church writings talkoing about...

1. becoming gods,

2. That Adam was God, and that God was a man on another planet,

3. That there are many gods

4. That God has a body of flesh and bones and that Jehovah, YHWH, and the Holy Ghost are three seperate Gods

Then I will convert to Mormonism.
well you see there was this priest name joseph jones who lost those 116 pages from the original bible
 
Upvote 0

LittleNipper

Contributor
Mar 9, 2005
9,011
174
MOUNT HOLLY, NEW JERSEY
✟10,660.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The difference between the Mormon Jesus and the Christian Jesus is strickingly diverse. The Mormon Jesus is portrayed strong and virial in his humanity (super hero). The Christian Jesus is portrayed as humble in his. I believe the Christian Jesus is the important one.
 
Upvote 0
B

buddy mack

Guest
LittleNipper said:
The difference between the Mormon Jesus and the Christian Jesus is strickingly diverse. The Mormon Jesus is portrayed strong and virial in his humanity (super hero). The Christian Jesus is portrayed as humble in his. I believe the Christian Jesus is the important one.
many a year ago, i was just a lad, i watch this TV show called WHAT'S MY LINE. anyhow, there was the MC, a group of celebrities asking questions of 3 men whom all claim to be JESUS. i remember some of the questions ask by the celebs to the 3 Jesus's, by the way only one was the real Jesus. anyhow, one of the question was. 'tell me Jesus #1, have you ever been married? answer was, NO, the next question was, to jesus #3, would you do it all again? #3 answered NO, and i remember a question asked of #2, Jesus #2, was your atonement in the garden or on the cross? answer was CROSS., well, after all the questions were asked, all the celebrities picked, Jesus #3. its been so long ago i cant remember who was the real Jesus though.........
 
Upvote 0

Doc T

Senior Veteran
Oct 28, 2003
4,744
66
✟5,246.00
Faith
CoreyZallow said:
While history says otherwise. Show me writings from early church Fathers before 570 A.D. (Thats when the apostasy supposedly happened) that support Mormon Doctrine.

If you can show me examples of the early Catholic church writings talkoing about...

1. becoming gods,

Corey, perhaps you missed the post I did some time back that demonstrated this. The list is very very long. If you would like to send me a PM with an email address I will send you the whole list. For now let me just post a few of them.

1. St. Justin Martyr (100-165):
"And we have learned that those only are deified who have lived near to God in holiness and virtue; and we believe that those who live wickedly and do not repent are punished in everlasting fire."(Justin Martyr. 1 Apol. 21.)

"Let the interpretation of the Psalm be held just as you wish, yet thereby it is demonstrated that all men are deemed worthy of becoming 'gods,' and of having power to become sons of the Highest."(Justin Martyr. Dia. 124.)

2. St. Theophilus of Antioch (115-181/188):
"But some one will say to us, Was man made by nature mortal? Certainly not. Was he, then, immortal? Neither do we affirm this. But one will say, Was he, then, nothing? Not even this hits the mark. He was by nature neither mortal nor immortal. For if He had made him immortal from the beginning, He would have made him God. Again, if He had made him mortal, God would seem to be the cause of his death.

Neither, then, immortal nor yet mortal did He make him, but, as we have said above, capable of both; so that if he should incline to the things of immortality, keeping the commandment of God, he should receive as reward from Him immortality, and should become God; but if, on the other hand, he should turn to the things of death, disobeying God, he should himself be the cause of death to himself. For God made man free, and with power over himself. That, then, which man brought upon himself through carelessness and disobedience, this God now vouchsafes to him as a gift through His own philanthropy and pity, when men obey Him. For as man, disobeying, drew death upon himself; so, obeying the will of God, he who desires is able to procure for himself life everlasting. For God has given us a law and holy commandments; and every one who keeps these can be saved, and, obtaining the resurrection, can inherit incorruption."(Theophilus of Antioch. Aut. 2:27.)

3. St. Irenaeus (120/140-200/203):
"Jesus Christ, who did, through His transcendent love, become what we are, that He might bring us to be even what He is Himself."(Iraneaus. Con. Haer. 5. Pref.)

"For as it certainly is in the power of a mother to give strong food to her infant, [but she does not do so], as the child is not yet able to receive more substantial nourishment; so also it was possible for God Himself to have made man perfect from the first, but man could not receive this [perfection], being as yet an infant. And for this cause our Lord in these last times, when He had summed up all things into Himself, came to us, not as He might have come, but as we were capable of beholding Him. He might easily have come to us in His immortal glory, but in that case we could never have endured the greatness of the glory; and therefore it was that He, who was the perfect bread of the Father, offered Himself to us as milk, [because we were] as infants. He did this when He appeared as a man, that we, being nourished, as it were, from the breast of His flesh, and having, by such a course of milk nourishment, become accustomed to eat and drink the Word of God, may be able also to contain in ourselves the Bread of immortality, which is the Spirit of the Father ... It was for this reason that the Son of God, although He was perfect, passed through the state of infancy in common with the rest of mankind, partaking of it thus not for His own benefit, but for that of the infantile stage of man's existence, in order that man might be able to receive Him. There was nothing, therefore, impossible to and deficient in God, [implied in the fact] that man was not an uncreated being; but this merely applied to him who was lately created, [namely] man ... His wisdom [is shown] in His having made created things parts of one harmonious and consistent whole; and those things which, through His super-eminent kindness, receive growth and a long period of existence, do reflect the glory of the uncreated One, of that God who bestows what is good ungrudgingly. For from the very fact of these things having been created, [it follows] that they are not uncreated; but by their continuing in being throughout a long course of ages, they shall receive a faculty of the Uncreated, through the gratuitous bestowal of eternal existence upon them by God. And thus in all things God has the pre-eminence, who alone is uncreated, the first of all things, and the primary cause of the existence of all, while all other things remain under God's subjection. But being in subjection to God is continuance in immortality, and immortality is the glory of the uncreated One. By this arrangement, therefore, and these harmonies, and a sequence of this nature, man, a created and organized being, is rendered after the image and likeness of the uncreated God, -the Father planning everything well and giving His commands, the Son carrying these into execution and performing the work of creating, and the Spirit nourishing and increasing [what is made], but man making progress day by day, and ascending towards the perfect, that is, approximating to the uncreated One. For the Uncreated is perfect, that is, God. Now it was necessary that man should in the first instance be created; and having been created, should receive growth; and having received growth, should be strengthened; and having been strengthened, should abound; and having abounded, should recover [from the disease of sin]; and having recovered, should be glorified; and being glorified, should see his Lord. For God is He who is yet to be seen, and the beholding of God is productive of immortality, but immortality renders one nigh unto God ... For these, [the dumb animals], bring no charge against God for not having made them men; but each one, just as he has been created, gives thanks that he has been created. For we cast blame upon Him, because we have not been made gods from the beginning, but at first merely men, then at length gods; although God has adopted this course out of His pure benevolence, that no one may impute to Him invidiousness or grudgingness. He declares, 'I have said, Ye are gods; and ye are all sons of the Highest.' But since we could not sustain the power of divinity, He adds, 'But ye shall die like men,' setting forth both truths -- the kindness of His free gift, and our weakness, and also that we were possessed of power over ourselves. For after His great kindness He graciously conferred good [upon us], and made men like to Himself."(Ireneaus. Con. Haer. 4:38:1-4.)

"And again: 'God stood in the congregation of the gods, He judges among the gods.' He [here] refers to the Father and the Son, and those who have received the adoption; but these are the Church. For she is the synagogue of God, which God -- that is, the Son Himself -- has gathered by Himself. Of whom He again speaks: 'The God of gods, the Lord hath spoken, and hath called the earth.' Who is meant by God? He of whom He has said, 'God shall come openly, our God, and shall not keep silence;' that is, the Son, who came manifested to men who said, 'I have openly appeared to those who seek Me not.' But of what gods [does he speak]? [Of those] to whom He says, 'I have said, Ye are gods, and all sons of the Most High.' To those, no doubt, who have received the grace of the "adoption, by which we cry, Abba Father.'"(Irenaeus. Con. Haer. 3:6:1.)

4. St. Clement of Alexandria (150-215):
"And now the Word Himself clearly speaks to thee, Shaming thy unbelief; yea, I say, the Word of God became man, that thou mayest learn from man how man may become God. Is it not then monstrous, my friends, that while God is ceaselessly exhorting us to virtue, we should spurn His kindness and reject salvation?"(Clement of Alexandria. Prot. 1)

"[Jesus] bestowed on us the truly great, divine, and inalienable inheritance of the Father, deifying man by heavenly teaching, putting His laws into our minds, and writing them on our hearts."(Clement of Alexandria. Prot. 11.)

"The view I take is, that He Himself formed man of the dust, and regenerated him by water; and made him grow by his Spirit; and trained him by His word to adoption and salvation, directing him by sacred precepts; in order that, transforming earth-born man into a holy and heavenly being by His advent, He might fulfill to the utmost that divine utterance, 'Let Us make man in Our own image and likeness.' And, in truth, Christ became the perfect realization of what God spake; and the rest of humanity is conceived as being created merely in His image. But let us, O children of the good Father -- nurslings of the good Instructor -- fulfill the Father's will, listen to the Word, and take on the impress of the truly saving life of our Savior; and meditating on the heavenly mode of life according to which we have been deified, let us anoint ourselves with the perennial immortal bloom of gladness -- that ointment of sweet fragrance -- having a clear example of immortality in the walk and conversation of the Lord; and following the footsteps of God, to whom alone it belongs to consider, and whose care it is to see to, the way and manner in which the life of men may be made more healthy."(Clement of Alexandria. Pae. 1:12.)

"Practical wisdom is divine knowledge, and exists in those who are deified."(Clement of Alexandria. Strom. 6:15.)

"Being baptized, we are illuminated; illuminated, we become sons; being made sons, we are made perfect; being made perfect, we are made immortal. 'I,' says He, 'have said that ye are gods, and all sons of the Highest.' This work is variously called grace, and illumination, and perfection, and washing: washing, by which we cleanse away our sins; grace, by which the penalties accruing to transgressions are remitted; and illumination, by which that holy light of salvation is beheld, that is, by which we see God clearly. Now we call that perfect which wants nothing. For what is yet wanting to him who knows God? For it were truly monstrous that that which is not complete should be called a gift (or act) of God's grace. Being perfect, He consequently bestows perfect gifts."(Clement of Alexandria. Pae. 1:6.)

"But that man with whom the Word dwells does not alter himself, does not get himself up: he has the form which is of the Word; he is made like to God; he is beautiful; he does not ornament himself: his is beauty, the true beauty, for it is God; and that man becomes God, since God so wills. Heraclitus, then, rightly said, 'Men are gods, and gods are men.' For the Word Himself is the manifest mystery: God in man, and man God. And the Mediator executes the Father's will; for the Mediator is the Word, who is common to both -- the Son of God, the Savior of men; His Servant, our Teacher."(Clement of Alexandria. Pae. 3:1.)

"Now the fifth in order is the command on the honor of father and mother. And it clearly announces God as Father and Lord. Wherefore also it calls those who know Him sons and gods."(Clement of Alexandria. Strom. 6:16.)

"And this takes place, whenever one hangs on the Lord by faith, by knowledge, by love, and ascends along with Him to where the God and guard of our faith and love is. Whence at last (on account of the necessity for very great preparation and previous training in order both to hear what is said, and for the composure of life, and for advancing intelligently to a point beyond the righteousness of the law) it is that knowledge is committed to those fit and selected for it. It leads us to the endless and perfect end, teaching us beforehand the future life that we shall lead, according to God, and with gods; after we are freed from all punishment and penalty which we undergo, in consequence of our sins, for salutary discipline. After which redemption the reward and the honors are assigned to those who have become perfect; when they have got done with purification, and ceased from all service, though it be holy service, and among saints. They become pure in heart, and near to the Lord, there awaits their restoration to everlasting contemplation; and they are called by the appellation of gods,being destined to sit on thrones with the other gods that have been first put in their places by the Savior."(Clement of Alexandria. Strom. 7:10.)

"The divine apostle writes accordingly respecting us: 'For now we see as through a glass;' knowing ourselves in it by reflection, and simultaneously contemplating, as we can, the efficient cause, from that, which, in us, is divine."(Clement of Alexandria. Strom. 1:19.)

5. Tertullian (155/160-220):

"Well, then, you say, we ourselves at that rate possess nothing of God. But indeed we do, and shall continue to do -- only it is from Him that we receive it, and not from ourselves. For we shall be even gods, if we, shall deserve to be among those of whom He declared, 'I have said, Ye are gods,' and, 'God standeth in the congregation of the gods.' But this comes of His own grace, not from any property in us, because it is He alone who can make gods."(Tertullian. Ad. Herm. 5.)

"(I ask you) call to mind along with them the passage where it is written, 'I have said, Ye are gods, and ye are children of the Most High;' and again, 'God standeth in the congregation of gods;' in order that, if the Scripture has not been afraid to designate as gods human beings, who have become sons of God by faith, you may be sure that the same Scripture has with greater propriety conferred the name of the Lord on the true and one-only Son of God."(Tertullian. Ad. Prax. 13.)


Doc

~
 
Upvote 0

Hidden Manna

Veteran
Feb 21, 2004
1,206
11
69
✟16,418.00
Faith
Christian
CoreyZallow said:
While history says otherwise. Show me writings from early church Fathers before 570 A.D. (Thats when the apostasy supposedly happened) that support Mormon Doctrine.

If you can show me examples of the early Catholic church writings talkoing about...

1. becoming gods,

2. That Adam was God, and that God was a man on another planet,

3. That there are many gods

4. That God has a body of flesh and bones and that Jehovah, YHWH, and the Holy Ghost are three seperate Gods

5. And more of Mormonism unusual doctrines

Then I will convert to Mormonism.

Forget the Mormans, that a look at the truth from a Preterist perspective.

How Jerusalem Fell
Here is a brief sketch of how Jerusalem fell. I have deliberately left out many of the graphic details of this conflict. However, if one reads the full account given by historians such as Josephus, it becomes quite clear that this period was the worst tribulation Israel had ever known or will ever know. When it was all done, the bodies of those who died from starvation and bloodshed filled the streets, Jerusalem was in complete ruins, and the temple was torn down with not one stone left on top of another.

The friction between Rome and the Jews began to intensify around 60 A.D. By 66 A.D. the situation had become a powder keg ready to ignite. Israel itself was deeply divided between those who favored peace with Rome and those who believed that God would deliver them from Roman rule. The chief supporters of peace were the temple priesthood and many of the rich and affluent Jews. Those who pursed war were known as the zealots. Many of these were fanatics that believed God had chosen them to deliver Israel.

Roman corruption and abuses led to open rebellion in 66 A.D., but when the Jews stopped the twice, daily sacrifices for Caesar in the Temple, this was considered an act of war. This caused hostilities to increase dramatically. Menahem, a messiah figure, gained early success against the Romans killing many of them. He entered Jerusalem dressed as a king, seized the temple complex, and had the High Priest put to death. Menahem’s reign did not last long however. The people rose up against him and tortured him to death.

It fell to the Roman Cestius to put down the revolt. He marched against Jerusalem with about 30,000 men. However, when victory was within his grasp, he mysteriously retreated. The Jews pursed the retreating Romans and killed many of them. This was taken to be a sign that God was indeed fighting against Rome.

In A.D. 67 Nero appointed Vespasian to bring Roman order back to Israel. He began a murderous campaign in the Galilee region. Vespasian was the epitome of Roman cruelty and brute force. He killed every male in several cities, took the women and children into slavery, and then marched on Jerusalem.

Escaping the wrath of Vespasian was a man named John Gischala. Upon entering Jerusalem, instead of speaking of Roman victories, he spoke of their weakness. He roused the zealots into a terrible battle with those who wanted peace. A battle on the steps of the temple ensued where 8,500 men perished. Finally, John killed the High Priest and appointed a buffoon in his place. Once in control of the temple this zealot brutalized the city killing tens of thousands who were thought to support Rome.

In A.D. 68 Nero died. What followed was Roman civil war. Vespasian was forced to call off his attack. By A.D. 69 Vespasian sat on the throne as Roman Emperor. He turned Roman might to unfinished business with the Jews. Titus, the emperor’s son, was appointed to deal with Israel. He followed in his father’s brutal footsteps.

By this time insanity reigned in Jerusalem. Zealot groups with would be Messiahs fought each other. And those who wanted peace joined in. Josephus said that „Blood stood in lakes in the holy courts themselves.‰ At one point in an effort to burn each other out two zealot groups set on fire the grain reserves for the city. These could have sustained the Jews for years against a siege. In the mean time, Titus began his barbarous march on Jerusalem. The final siege began.

Even with huge siege engines and towers, the Romans had little success breaching the three walls of Jerusalem. The Jews mocked the Roman soldiers, which only increased Titus’ cruelty. The Romans stripped all wood for an eleven mile radius around the city and still ran out of wood for crosses to crucify the rebels.

Finally, Titus turned hunger into his most formidable weapon. He had a siege dike dug around the entire city. All supplies were completely cut off. Starvation and madness filled the city. Bodies of the dead filled the streets. Zealot bands roamed the streets killing whole families for even a morsel of food. The stench became unbearable. Josephus wrote that the Jews themselves did far more to destroy Jerusalem than the Romans ever did.

At last Titus gained access to the city. As he approached the temple, a battle broke out that was so fierce as to be inhuman. Still, Titus gave orders to spare the temple. However, in the ensuing madness the temple was set ablaze. Then the Roman general brought the Roman standard and offered sacrifices as the ultimate defilement. In an effort to salvage the gold that lined much of the temple, the Romans tore apart the structure leaving not one stone left on top of another.

Titus ordered Jerusalem to be destroyed and burned. Countless thousands met death at the end of a Roman sword. The rest were taken into slavery or killed later for sport. Josephus writes that after all was done, it was hard to believe that anyone ever inhabited the city. It is estimated that over a million Jews died in this conflict. This was the end of Biblical Judaism and the Old Covenant world.

A small note about Herod‚s temple, taking and utterly destroying Herod‚s temple was no small feat. The temple took up as much at 25% of the city of Jerusalem. It was 1500 feet north to south and covered over 35 acres. The buildings were twice the height of those in Solomon‚s temple. Its courtyards were paved in marble, and many of the walls were overlaid in solid gold. At times there were at many as 20,000 priests serving the temple. You could imagine the disciple’s thoughts when Jesus said that this entire structure would be destroyed.

Jerusalem’s Great Tribulation

There is no doubt at all that the destruction of the Jews in Jerusalem was the Great Tribulation come down from God. (Lamentations 4:9-12; Ezekiel 5:5-17; Luke 21:20-23) You might also point out that the Bible says those were the days of vengeance, that all things, which are written, may be fulfilled.

I am taking just several versions of the translations of the New Testament for this one verse from Luke 21:22, to indicate exactly what this verse does mean, as viewed by more that just one translator or group of translators.

Greek Interlinear: “for days of avenging these are, that may be accomplished all things that have been written.”

Today’s English Version: “For these are ‘The Days of Punishment,’ to make come true all that the Scripture say.”

Jerusalem Bible. “For this is the time of vengeance when all that scripture says must be fulfilled.”

Phillips Modern English: “For these are the days of vengeance, when all that the scripture have said will come true.”

New English Bible: “because this is the time of retribution, when all that stands written is to be be fulfilled.

Revised Standard Version: “for these are days of vengeance, to fulfill all that is written.”

I could go on and on, but you can see the plain evident meaning of this verse. By the time Jerusalem was destroyed ALL scripture would be fulfilled ever that about the great tribulation in the Old Testament and New Testament.

Also Jesus had said, “I am come to send FIRE on the earth; and what will I, if it be already kindled?” (Luke 12:49). This was not to be literal fire, but the fire of His wrath and justice, and a change of religious systems. In Lamentations 2:3 it says,.. he burned against Jacob like a flaming fire devoureth round about.” This too was the fire of God’s great tribulation upon the Jews.

You might also want to point out that the Jews in Hitler day were NOT the Jews who came against Christ and his church. Only the Jews in the first century fit that bill. And it was only upon them the great tribulation was to come. In fact Jesus said during the day of “abomination of desolation there will be great tribulation (such as has not been since the beginning of the world until this time no, nor ever shall be) (Matthew 24:15-21)

It looks like our futurist brothers have a big, big problem. Every Christian scholars agrees the “abomination of desolation” were during the days leading up to the destruction of Jerusalem. Well Jesus said (they were the days) of the great tribulation since the beginning of the world and ever again will there ever be.
So the Jews who died by the hands of Hitler were NOT in the great tribulation. The dispensationalists and others do wrong to make tribulation be a stated period of time in our future.

The Jewish world came tumbling down in A.D. 70. The Jewish nation was decimated. The outward symbols of the Old covenant, the ritualistic elements of the old religious system, the holy place (including the land, the city and the Temple) were completely destroyed.

Nothing like this had ever happened to the Jewish people. Their world had ended. And it took all of this to show to them how wrong they had been in what they had done to Jesus Christ and then to His followers.

“Immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken. (Matthew 24:29) Note several things here also. First, Jesus is talking about the tribulation of “THOSE DAYS” (That is, of the very days during which the Jews were undergoing this terrible tribulation from A.D 67-70). “Those days” definitely determines the time in which is under discussion.

Which means of course, that He is not talking about some “tribulation” during a later course. Second, what He was talking about was to happen “IMMEDIATELY” after the tribulation of those days.” The word “immediately” is from the Greek word eutheos which means “at once, or soon, as soon as, forthwith, shortly, straight way.” There is another big problem. It certainly would not portray a time frame of over 2,000 years or so later.


Mat 24:9 Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name’s sake.

Mat 24:10 And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another.

Mat 24:11 And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many.

Mat 10:34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.

Mat 10:35 For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

Mat 10:36 And a man’s foes [shall be] they of his own household.

These passages could not be a more accurate description of the events leading up to the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. One only has to read the Bible to see this is so. The book of Acts, as well as the epistles speak of intense persecution coming against the church.

At first the early believers faced two classes of enemies. They were the unbelieving Jews and the Judaizers. The unbelieving Jews rejected the Messiah outright. Unbelieving zealots such as Saul brought great tribulation to the church. The Judaizers embraced Christ at first, but said that it was necessary to keep the Old Covenant to be saved. Thus, they had one foot in the Old Covenant and one foot in the New. These two groups did everything from organizing boycotts against Christians who would not confess that Caesar was lord to killing them outright.

It was this divide between those who refused to leave the Old Covenant and those who embraced the New that caused son to turn against father etc. This fits the first century setting perfectly.

As the time of the destruction of Jerusalem approached persecution against the church intensified greatly. A third persecutor arose. Rome. Nero, in his insanity, declared that the Christians were responsible for a great fire the engulfed Rome, and made them enemies of the state. Nero had Christians murdered in the most horrible ways including having them fed to wild beasts, burned at the stake, and killed in gladiatorial contests.

So great was the onslaught against from these three persecutors that if the Jewish rebellion had not broken out, the church might have perished from the earth. Upon the death of Nero, Rome’s persecution against the church ended. Instead, the wrath of Rome came upon the very Jews that had persecuted the church.

Now, combine these things with Jesus’ statement that all these things would happen within a generation, and you must conclude that “the tribulation” had already occurred.
 
Upvote 0

Swart

ÜberChristian
Mar 22, 2004
6,527
204
58
Melbourne
Visit site
✟32,187.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
LittleNipper said:
The difference between the Mormon Jesus and the Christian Jesus is strickingly diverse. The Mormon Jesus is portrayed strong and virial in his humanity (super hero). The Christian Jesus is portrayed as humble in his. I believe the Christian Jesus is the important one.

Do you have an example of this portrayal?
 
Upvote 0
CoreyZallow said:
While history says otherwise. Show me writings from early church Fathers before 570 A.D. (Thats when the apostasy supposedly happened) that support Mormon Doctrine.

If you can show me examples of the early Catholic church writings talkoing about...

1. becoming gods,

2. That Adam was God, and that God was a man on another planet,

3. That there are many gods

4. That God has a body of flesh and bones and that Jehovah, YHWH, and the Holy Ghost are three seperate Gods

5. And more of Mormonism unusual doctrines

Then I will convert to Mormonism.

Nobody converts to Mormonism by having someone prove something to you. The conversion to all things in Christianity entails proving things for yourself. It always follows a pattern, exemplified here.

Bring ye all the tithes into the storehouse, that there may be meat in mine house, and prove me now herewith, saith the LORD of hosts, if I will not open you the windows of heaven, and pour you out a blessing, that there shall not be room enough to receive it. (Malachi 3:10)

You see an action that requires faith and obedience, before the full knowledge (or proof) is given.
 
Upvote 0

steve_kyle

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
31
2
50
✟163.00
Faith
Baptist
obody converts to Mormonism by having someone prove something to you. The conversion to all things in Christianity entails proving things for yourself. It always follows a pattern, exemplified here.

We must be careful to note that Mormonism is not a "Christian" religion. In his earliest statements, Joseph Smith talked about Mormonism being the only way to God, because all other Christian religions were in apostacy. Of course we can also point out that the book of Mormon has undergone thousands of "corrections and revisions" over the past 100 years or so, and that many of Smith's "revelations" came through an Egyptian "seeing stone" that he put in a hat and buried his face in, while his wives wrote the "revelations" down. The Bible also gives a warning about adding to or taking away from the scriptures. Well, they added a whole book, and they also claim that their translation of the Bible is the ONLY accurate translation. That all of the other translators in the past several hundred years were dead wrong, and they happened to get it right.

Wow, need we bring up changing doctrines like "you cannot have caffine to drink." Then, they buy Pepsi, now they can drink Pepsi. Not legit, not Christian. Merely people using the name of Jesus, that's all.
 
Upvote 0

Swart

ÜberChristian
Mar 22, 2004
6,527
204
58
Melbourne
Visit site
✟32,187.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
steve_kyle said:
Of course we can also point out that the book of Mormon has undergone thousands of "corrections and revisions" over the past 100 years or so,

Source please.

steve_kyle said:
and that many of Smith's "revelations" came through an Egyptian "seeing stone" that he put in a hat and buried his face in, while his wives wrote the "revelations" down.

Source for this too.

steve_kyle said:
Wow, need we bring up changing doctrines like "you cannot have caffine to drink." Then, they buy Pepsi, now they can drink Pepsi.

Reference?
 
Upvote 0

A New Dawn

Bind my wandering heart to thee!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2004
71,063
7,945
Western New York
✟159,693.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
MormonFriend said:
Nobody converts to Mormonism by having someone prove something to you. The conversion to all things in Christianity entails proving things for yourself.
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

The conversion to all things in Christianity is by the power of the Holy Spirit. It is by God changing your heart, your way of thinking, your way of doing things so that you are focused on Him, alone. There is no room for anything else when you are truly converted to Him.
 
Upvote 0
B

buddy mack

Guest
Swart said:
Source please.



Source for this too.



Reference?
Swart, be warned, if you start down the road of investigation of early church history, you will either become an apostate, closet doubter, or go crazy, so before you start, think really really hard whether it is worth it. reference #1 D. Michael Quinn, and his new edition book, EARLY MORMONISM AND THE MAGIC WORLD VIEW. i think he is still a member of the LDS, or was he ex-ed i cant remember....
 
Upvote 0

Swart

ÜberChristian
Mar 22, 2004
6,527
204
58
Melbourne
Visit site
✟32,187.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
CoreyZallow said:
While history says otherwise.
<snip>

Ignoring the points you have written. I am certain I can conclusively prove the occurrence of the Apostacy through a process of induction.

Essentially, this means establishing a set of conditions which need to be fulfilled to provide an unbroken line of continuous interaction between God and man from the time of Christ to present day. We then test to see if those conditions are met.

The problem of course is setting the starting conditions, which of necessity must come from the scriptural description of the 1C Church. We then take a walk through history. I think I know my history reasonably well, so that shouldn't be too difficult.

The process of induction will, unfortunately, take a great deal of time.
 
Upvote 0

fatboys

Senior Veteran
Nov 18, 2003
9,231
280
72
✟68,575.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
buddy mack said:
Swart, be warned, if you start down the road of investigation of early church history, you will either become an apostate, closet doubter, or go crazy, so before you start, think really really hard whether it is worth it. reference #1 D. Michael Quinn, and his new edition book, EARLY MORMONISM AND THE MAGIC WORLD VIEW. i think he is still a member of the LDS, or was he ex-ed i cant remember....

D. Michael Quinn was a professor of History at BYU. He has written some interestin books. Even though he has thousands of references, he also interjects his own opinions and speculations. Even though he has written some things that do not flatter Joseph Smith or the church, and even though he has been exed, he still believes that Joseph Smith was a prophet, and that the Book of Mormon is the word of God. He has some strange and speculative ideas, and the reason he was exed had nothing to do with what he wrote. Any of us can have our own ideas. I have studied Quinns, tanners, White, Martins, and many many more thoughts on the LDS church. I am not crazy, and I am not a closet doubter, in fact as I do more research, the stronger I am. Your problem is that you believe the words of this person or that person. You are eager to believe the negative. Why is it that those who disagree with the church are so willing too believe the negative, and never believe anything positive. Makes you wonder if they are really searching for truth.
 
Upvote 0
B

buddy mack

Guest
Why is it that those who disagree with the church are so willing too believe the negative, and never believe anything positive. Makes you wonder if they are really searching for truth.[/QUOTE] Thanks for your response. First it isn't about negative or positive infomation, it's about the TRUTH, and how do we find TRUTH? Not by, faith, opinion, feelings, or speculation. TRUTH come from facts, evidence weight and sorted out. So lets look at some facts. #1, did Joseph Smith go to trial for money digging with a magic stone? Answer, yes. #2 did anyone actualy touch feel and see with their own eyes the Golden Plates? Answer, no one other than Joseph Smith. #3 according to the way Joseph Smith translated the golden plates, (by using the stone placed in a hat and as he translated one word, god would not revile the next word to JS until he got the last word correct), so the question is how come there were so many mistakes? #4 Joseph Smith practice polygamy 10 years before he gave his revelation. #5 the Kinderhook plates hoxs. #6 the book of Abraham, #7 mason connection with temple rites. #8 Joseph Smith false revelations. #9 no Prophet of late gives prophesy, #10 DNA...............now, these are facts it is up to you to decide if it is the Gospel TRUTH.
 
Upvote 0

Doc T

Senior Veteran
Oct 28, 2003
4,744
66
✟5,246.00
Faith
buddy mack said:
Thanks for your response. First it isn't about negative or positive infomation, it's about the TRUTH, and how do we find TRUTH? Not by, faith, opinion, feelings, or speculation. TRUTH come from facts, evidence weight and sorted out. So lets look at some facts.

Yes, indeed. Let's examine the facts as laid out by Buddy.

buddy mack said:
#1, did Joseph Smith go to trial for money digging with a magic stone? Answer, yes.

So?

buddy mack said:
#2 did anyone actualy touch feel and see with their own eyes the Golden Plates? Answer, no one other than Joseph Smith.

Wrong. Each of the 8 witnesses to the BofM actually touched and felt and saw with their own eyes the Golden Plates.

buddy mack said:
#3 according to the way Joseph Smith translated the golden plates, (by using the stone placed in a hat and as he translated one word, god would not revile the next word to JS until he got the last word correct), so the question is how come there were so many mistakes?

Since Joseph Smith never told us how he translated the Golden Plates, other than they were translated by the gift and power of God, then any other information is second hand and incomplete.

buddy mack said:
#4 Joseph Smith practice polygamy 10 years before he gave his revelation.

You mean 10 years before he recorded the revelation in writing.

buddy mack said:
#5 the Kinderhook plates hoxs.

Yes, and I believe that Joseph Smith also felt the Kinderhook plates were a hoax. You see there is no translation of the Kinderhook plates. And it is interesting that the "hoax" was never sprung on JS. It was never revealed that it was a hoax until many years after JS death.

buddy mack said:
#6 the book of Abraham,

A wonderful book that is being authenticated year after year and more and more documents about Abraham are being discovered. You really ought to check it out.

buddy mack said:
#7 mason connection with temple rites.

And there is a problem with this how?

buddy mack said:
#8 Joseph Smith false revelations.

That is one I am still waiting to see. I find it rather hypocritical that OC fully accept the explinations of the "contradictions" in the Bible, but dismiss the explinations of the "false revelations" of JS.

buddy mack said:
#9 no Prophet of late gives prophesy,

If you would care to check it out, giving prophecy is not the only thing a prophet does.

buddy mack said:

Interesting stuff. Have you read the latest information on the Y-chromosomal DNA that shows Jewish ancestory in the MesoAmerican indians? The DNA research is still too new to draw the conclusions that are being made by our critics.

buddy mack said:
..............now, these are facts it is up to you to decide if it is the Gospel TRUTH.

I really think you had better re-think your facts, because they only show your ignorance of Mormonism.

Doc

~
 
Upvote 0

fatboys

Senior Veteran
Nov 18, 2003
9,231
280
72
✟68,575.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
buddy mack said:
Why is it that those who disagree with the church are so willing too believe the negative, and never believe anything positive. Makes you wonder if they are really searching for truth.
Thanks for your response. First it isn't about negative or positive infomation, it's about the TRUTH, and how do we find TRUTH? Not by, faith, opinion, feelings, or speculation. TRUTH come from facts, evidence weight and sorted out. So lets look at some facts.

Again you prove my point. Did you ever, even for one second think...I wonder why this is different from what others have stated which is almost quite the opposite. Yet you would believe all these negatives. Do you believe everything that newspapers print? I mean don't they have a code of ethics that states they can only print the truth so they are not misleading people? Have you ever known newspaper persons to make up stories?

Now I will admit that Joseph Smith could have made this whole thing up. Yet most frauds do not want to die for there frauds.

#1, did Joseph Smith go to trial for money digging with a magic stone? Answer, yes.

Under what circumstances? Have you looked into both sides of the story? Did you know that the very person who this warrent was made out in refused to testify against Joseph Smith because it was not him who made it out, but his sons, under the direction of another relative?

#2 did anyone actualy touch feel and see with their own eyes the Golden Plates? Answer, no one other than Joseph Smith.

Have you even read the testimony of the eight witnesses?

#3 according to the way Joseph Smith translated the golden plates, (by using the stone placed in a hat and as he translated one word, god would not revile the next word to JS until he got the last word correct), so the question is how come there were so many mistakes?

Since no ever seen the translation process, and Joseph Smith never said how it was done except to say that is was done by way of the Urim and Thummin, then the rest is speculation.
#4 Joseph Smith practice polygamy 10 years before he gave his revelation.

Do you mean that Joseph Smith did not make known the revelation for ten years?

#5 the Kinderhook plates hoxs.

First off, was there a translation of these plates? If so, where are they? Second, if those who participated in this Hoax, felt they had uncovered a fraud, why did they not make it known at the time. Instead we have only one account fifty years after the fact. Wouldn't this have given them recongition if they had fooled Joseph Smith?

#6 the book of Abraham,

What a wonderful fruit of a living breathing modern day prophet. More of God's word.

#7 mason connection with temple rites.

And????????

#8 Joseph Smith false revelations.

I would say man's lack of understanding of Gods work and revelations. All blessings from God depend upon our faith. You believe by faith you are saved. What a wonderful blessing. If you are not faithful, then you will not recieve those blessings. It is no different that prophecies, revelations given to us. If we do not abide to them, we have no promise to receive blessings from none compliance.

#9 no Prophet of late gives prophesy,

Each and every prophet since time have prophecied that if we are not obedient to the Lord we will be condemned?

#10 DNA...............now, these are facts it is up to you to decide if it is the Gospel TRUTH.

You and I nor anyone else know enough to say with any certainty one thing or the other. It is a tactic used by anti mormons to say that Faith is no longer necessary for believing in God. That science and its limited knowledge is what we should rely on. This would also place almost every religion and certainly every mainstream christian church as false. Can not have your cake and eat it to.
 
Upvote 0

A New Dawn

Bind my wandering heart to thee!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2004
71,063
7,945
Western New York
✟159,693.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
fatboys said:
Since no ever seen the translation process, and Joseph Smith never said how it was done except to say that is was done by way of the Urim and Thummin, then the rest is speculation.
Better be careful, fatboys. Joseph Smith never stated that it was done by way of the Urim & Thummim. He said the plates were translated by the gift and power of the Holy Ghost.

It was WWPhelps, in the Millenial Star(?) in 1832, that attributed the name "Urim & Thummim" to the interpreters.
 
Upvote 0

fatboys

Senior Veteran
Nov 18, 2003
9,231
280
72
✟68,575.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Jenda said:
Better be careful, fatboys. Joseph Smith never stated that it was done by way of the Urim & Thummim. He said the plates were translated by the gift and power of the Holy Ghost.

It was WWPhelps, in the Millenial Star(?) in 1832, that attributed the name "Urim & Thummim" to the interpreters.


I am sure I read that Joseph Smith stated the Urim and Thummin was used, I will check into it thanks. Sometimes my mind wonders. thanks again for the check. If anyone would know, you would.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.