Proof the Earth is Flat

[d taylor]

I basically believe there are these three groups.

Governments have their scientist who lie for them.
Corporations have their scientist who lie for them.
and
These creation organizations have their scientist who lie for them.

And then there is the Bible, who basally nobody believes, about Gods creation.

 

[Shrewd Manager]

doesn't bother me whether earth flat or not. It hardly changes the fact that Jesus is Lord and saviour.

Easy to trust God when the word is uncontroversial. But when the Bible teaches what's repugnant to modern so called science? Faith in the small things shouldn't be overlooked. In fact, you might find it reveals everything in God's word is offensive to the world. Because the devil runs the world, and his job is to invert everything. He's a pro btw.

 

[d taylor]

Any time a science person wants to post a photo that even hits at the moon being in outer space 230,000+ miles away from earth go ahead.

Here is a photo (actually two) taken this morning and the moon is clearly seen as being in front of the space behind it know as the sky, heaven, raqia.

​

​

 

[Shrewd Manager]

It's so uplifting to behold God's creation in its beauty and simplicity.

 

[JacksBratt]

Any time a science person wants to post a photo that even hits at the moon being in outer space 230,000+ miles away from earth go ahead.

Here is a photo (actually two) taken this morning and the moon is clearly seen as being in front of the space behind it know as the sky, heaven, raqia.

View attachment 286437


View attachment 286438
​

​

My question is...

In order for the moon to be illuminated as it is in the photos.. would the sun not have to be visible to us?

I mean only a small sliver of the moon is reflecting the sun.. So this means that the vast majority of the other side of the moon must be reflecting the sun..

In order for that to happen, would the sun not have to be in sight... Light still travels in a straight line.. so, how can the majority of the opposite side of the moon be exposed to the sun and not have the sun in our line of sight?

 

[d taylor]

My question is...

In order for the moon to be illuminated as it is in the photos.. would the sun not have to be visible to us?

I mean only a small sliver of the moon is reflecting the sun.. So this means that the vast majority of the other side of the moon must be reflecting the sun..

In order for that to happen, would the sun not have to be in sight... Light still travels in a straight line.. so, how can the majority of the opposite side of the moon be exposed to the sun and not have the sun in our line of sight?

Well in the globe sciences version they are saying the moon is 230,000 miles away from earth. So it is always lit.

But that is what i have been saying in the past.

That if the moon is a sphere, we should still see light shinning all the way around the moon (like it does in a full moon) at all times.

Like this illustration

On my photo the light from the full moon side sill should be seen. But it is not, so

 

[d taylor]

A full moon, now in this photo the full moon is lighting up the sky.
So in the crescent moon photo taken the other day, why is the sky not lit up as in the full moon photo below.
Because according to science the moon is a sphere and on the other side of the moon, the moon is in a full moon phase. Which should still be lightning up the sky around the moon.

Here are the two photos side by side, again where is the light in the sky on the crescent moon like is seen in the full moon.

Because according to science the moon is a sphere lit by the sun, so a crescent moon still should be lighting up the sky just like a full moon does.

This proves that 1. the moon is not lit by the sun and 2. the moon is not a sphere.

But more than likely a flat or mostly flat disk or a convex shape disk that produces light that only shines toward the earth.

 

[d taylor]

The moon is a very good exposer of science lies. But i would say water is as good or even better. Especially a perfectly clam lake, the same calm lake can remain perfectly calm on a rotating sphere. But a slight breeze can disturb the surface of same calm lake.

The more i think about people believing that water can adhere, to a rotating sphere (and remain perfectly calm on many lakes).

It is just simply beyond fantastic that, that is even remotely believable. And there exist people who can not believe in God, but can believe water can stick to a rotating sphere.

What a lie infected time we are in.​

 

[JackRT]

Newton explained it 370 years ago. His laws of motion and gravity have been validated over and over since then.

 

[Yttrium]

The moon is a very good exposer of science lies. But i would say water is as good or even better. Especially a perfectly clam lake, the same calm lake can remain perfectly calm on a rotating sphere. But a slight breeze can disturb the surface of same calm lake.

The more i think about people believing that water can adhere, to a rotating sphere (and remain perfectly calm on many lakes).

It is just simply beyond fantastic that, that is even remotely believable. And there exist people who can not believe in God, but can believe water can stick to a rotating sphere.

What a lie infected time we are in.​

Forget the water. What about the atmosphere? How is gas sticking to the surface of the Earth???

 

[d taylor]

Forget the water. What about the atmosphere? How is gas sticking to the surface of the Earth???

The earth is encased in a dome (raqia)

 

[Yttrium]

The earth is encased in a dome (raqia)

...

You were talking about water problems with a globe Earth. I just wanted to point out the similar but even worse air issue on a globe Earth.


Well, never mind.

 

[Tom 1]

The moon is a very good exposer of science lies. But i would say water is as good or even better. Especially a perfectly clam lake, the same calm lake can remain perfectly calm on a rotating sphere. But a slight breeze can disturb the surface of same calm lake.

The more i think about people believing that water can adhere, to a rotating sphere (and remain perfectly calm on many lakes).

It is just simply beyond fantastic that, that is even remotely believable. And there exist people who can not believe in God, but can believe water can stick to a rotating sphere.

What a lie infected time we are in.​

Lacking basic knowledge is not an excuse for spreading malicious slander.

 

[d taylor]

Lacking basic knowledge is not an excuse for spreading malicious slander.

You are clever, but that is expected of one who identifies as a christian, but believes science over The Bibles descriptions of Gods creation.

 

[Tom 1]

You are clever, but that is expected of one who identifies as a christian, but believes science over The Bibles descriptions of Gods creation.

What the language used in Genesis actually meant to the people who wrote it is something anyone can find out, clever doesn’t come into it. Whatever drives the need to insist it means whatever any random reader happens to think it does I don’t know, but it has nothing to do with either science or the bible.

 

[d taylor]

What the language used in Genesis actually meant to the people who wrote it is something anyone can find out, clever doesn’t come into it. Whatever drives the need to insist it means whatever any random reader happens to think it does I don’t know, but it has nothing to do with either science or the bible.

Keep believing in your satanic fantasy earth, etc.. and enjoy while you have it. Because you will have an eternity will the real creation.

 

[Tom 1]

A full moon, now in this photo the full moon is lighting up the sky.
So in the crescent moon photo taken the other day, why is the sky not lit up as in the full moon photo below.
Because according to science the moon is a sphere and on the other side of the moon, the moon is in a full moon phase. Which should still be lightning up the sky around the moon.

Here are the two photos side by side, again where is the light in the sky on the crescent moon like is seen in the full moon.

Because according to science the moon is a sphere lit by the sun, so a crescent moon still should be lighting up the sky just like a full moon does.

View attachment 286534

View attachment 286535

This proves that 1. the moon is not lit by the sun and 2. the moon is not a sphere.

But more than likely a flat or mostly flat disk or a convex shape disk that produces light that only shines toward the earth.

You can easily test your theory with a lamp, a basketball, and a golf ball. Hold the golf ball so it is facing the lamp - is the whole golf ball lit to the same degree by the lamp, or is the side facing the lamp receiving more light? Put the basketball between the lamp and the golf ball - does the light from the lamp still light the golf ball directly? If not, why not?

 

[Tom 1]

Keep believing in your satanic fantasy earth, etc.. and enjoy while you have it. Because you will have an eternity will the real creation.

There are quite literally no reasons for what you believe. You have nothing to support your belief. It would be extremely easy for you to learn about the bible, but for some reason you prefer to live in obscurity and spend your time pointing a finger at 'sinners' who choose not to share your ignorance. Why is that? That would be a genuinely useful question to ask yourself - what motivates you to refuse to learn anything and to spread slanderous ideas about other people? Getting to the bottom of a question like that is something that could really help sections of the US to escape the love of ignorance and stupidity.

 

[d taylor]

There are quite literally no reasons for what you believe. You have nothing to support your belief. It would be extremely easy for you to learn about the bible, but for some reason you prefer to live in obscurity and spend your time pointing a finger at 'sinners' who choose not to share your ignorance. Why is that? That would be a genuinely useful question to ask yourself - what motivates you to refuse to learn anything and to spread slanderous ideas about other people? Getting to the bottom of a question like that is something that could really help sections of the US to escape the love of ignorance and stupidity.

No reasons, try yourself open up your Bible (if you have one) try Joshua 10. See if you can understand this simple account of a battle. If you can not get that one, no reason to go further.

What is your reason for believing lies over the truth of the Bible.

 

[d taylor]

You can easily test your theory with a lamp, a basketball, and a golf ball. Hold the golf ball so it is facing the lamp - is the whole golf ball lit to the same degree by the lamp, or is the side facing the lamp receiving more light? Put the basketball between the lamp and the golf ball - does the light from the lamp still light the golf ball directly? If not, why not?

I do not need to test what i have photographed and posted here the truth speaks for itself. If you do not believe it is no concern of mine.

Simple you can not post a photo of a crescent moon, giving off as much light as a full moon. Which should be easy to do if the moon was sphere being lit by the sun.

So you can not post a photo, you have no support for your sun lit light reflected moon lie. But yet you persist to continue to believe in science over the Bible, where God easily states He created two lights in Genesis 1