Ill stick with what I know. God created. Men's theories come and go. As it has always been, It will forever be.
And if you were a Buddhist you would "know" something completely different.Ill stick with what I know. God created. Men's theories come and go. As it has always been, It will forever be.
I didn't say that.
I'm saying would you start to "hope"?
Ah ... silly me. I should have known!Choice number 4.
"Creation", as creationists use the word.
It's poorly written then. If atheists and collegians can use it to demand cease-and-desist orders against the likes of Judge Moore, then that clause needs a facelift.Why do you find the Separation clause to be "ugly"?
How do you know it wasn't Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, Daoists, Shinto, Confucianists, Pagans, Wiccans, etc. who were demanding that HIS particular scripture be taken out of the government building? After all, the display of the scripture of a particular religion, and ONLY that religion, is slap in their collective faces as well.It's poorly written then. If atheists and collegians can use it to demand cease-and-desist orders against the likes of Judge Moore, then that clause needs a facelift.
It's poorly written then. If atheists and collegians can use it to demand cease-and-desist orders against the likes of Judge Moore, then that clause needs a facelift.
True ... true.How do you know it wasn't Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, Daoists, Shinto, Confucianists, Pagans, Wiccans, etc. who were demanding that HIS particular scripture be taken out of the government building?
It's not the Creator part. I know a number of Christian/Buddhist. That's not what I'm meaning. What I'm looking at has more to do with your dualism thinking.Because I believe in a creator? That's not either here or there for a Buddhist.
Judge Moore? Hopefully not Judge Roy “Loves the little children” Moore?It's poorly written then. If atheists and collegians can use it to demand cease-and-desist orders against the likes of Judge Moore, then that clause needs a facelift.
What I’m looking at isn’t about belief. It’s about non-duality as a “reality”.I'm not one to believe in two opposite concepts at the same time if that is what you mean.
The most probable reason is that the poll is so poorly constructed, being ambiguous, restricted in choice, strongly biased and generally inept, that many members simply ignore it.But there are reasons [why not all posters in the thread have voted], and I think I know the number one one.
Yes it is. See above.No it isn't [silly].