Almighty's humble servant
Fisher of men
How is this possible, considering it is not the third day yet?yes, my bad.......it was Narses after Justinian relieved Belisarius of command , I think around 546-548ish..........if my notes I'm reading are correct, but most historians give the main credit to Belisarius
and it was not renamed "holy roman empire" under Justinian, I didn't want to go into a long explanation of history but I should have at least clarified that part, the way it reads seems to imply Justinian defeats the Ostrogoths then renames it the holy roman empire.............
but I think it was Otto I or "Otto the great" when it was first named Imperium Romanum Sacrum (Holy Roman Empire) and that wasn't until around 960's ............??
regardless of this though I set out to show that the deadly head wound to the beast has already been healed in the past, that not all prophecy in Revelation should be seen to be yet future of our time and that the beast isn't an individual but rather the last of 4 world ruling empires of Nebuchadnezzar's dream, Daniel's dreams and visions and the single beast given to John in Revelation.
This would leave no open room for speculation of a man or future "antichrist" still yet to receive the deadly head wound.
And if it were true, and the beast was the unholy RE, which was wounded, and healed by the RCC, then that would appear to accuse the papacy of being the a/c, of which he would have surrendered his seat just seven years after the formation of his unholy RE.
Upvote
0