Dispy
Veteran
- Jan 16, 2004
- 2,551
- 32
- 93
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
In response to you youtube commentator concerning Jacob and Esau.
The following is a protion taken from chapter 9 from the book The Power of God Unto Salvation - Is the Gospel Enough by Joel Finck.
Calvinists often use several verses from Romans chapter 9 to support the notion that God picks some people to be saved and others are "hardened" so they will remain lost. In this chapter, we will show that this simply is not the case. We have already covered Romans 9:11-13, but will review it here so we see it in the context of the entire chapter. "For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of Him that calleth; It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger. As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated" (Rom. 9:11- 13).
This remarkable passage is construed by Calvinism to mean that before Jacob and Esau were born, Jacob was chosen to be saved and Esau to be damned. The text says nothing of the sort. C.R. Stam correctly comments, "Surely the above passage has nothing to do with predestination to Heaven or Hell. It does not say, nor imply that God gave eternal life to Jacob but consigned Esau to eternal damnation, much less that God loved Jacob and hated Esau before they were born. Nor yet does 'the purpose of God according to election,' in verse 11, have to do with eternal salvation and reprobation, but rather with His purpose to make the descendants of Jacob, rather than those of Esau, His special people."
It can easily be demonstrated that God had nations, not individuals in mind when He said to Rebekah, "The elder shall serve the younger." This quote comes from Genesis 25:23, "And the LORD said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger."
Furthermore, we know God had nations, not individuals in mind, for Esau never served Jacob personally. But the nation which descended from Esau (Edom) did serve the nation which descended from Jacob (Israel). An example of this is found in I Chronicles, "And he put garrisons in Edom; and all the Edomites became David's servants" (I Chron. 18:13a).
The statement, "Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated" (Rom. 9:13) is often used by Calvinists to "prove" that God picked Jacob to be saved and Esau to be lost, even before they were born. But the fact is, this statement was first made in Malachi 1:2, some FOURTEEN HUNDRED YEARS after they were born. Again, the point in Malachi is not God's love or hatred for Jacob and Esau, personally. Rather, it refers to God's view of the two nations which descended from these two men.
Now, what is the point of this discussion of Jacob and Esau? Remember the overall context of Romans chapters 9-11 is to explain how God could set aside the Jews and turn to the Gentiles. Paul is simply illustrating from history that God can work through whomever He chooses, and if He decides to depart from the "norm," He has the fight to do so. Technically, Esau should have become the chosen nation, because he was the firstborn. But God, in His sovereignty, chose to use Jacob instead to become the father of the chosen nation.
Upvote
0