- Feb 4, 2006
- 46,773
- 10,976
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If you agree that 'we don't know what doing (or not doing) the right thing even means', then how do you think can it be taught, either at home or in school?
But if we can't agree on what is the right thing to do, and we don't know what that even means, how do you think can it be taught, either at home or in school?It is known intrinsically.
But if we can't agree on what is the right thing to do, and we don't know what that even means, how do you think can it be taught, either at home or in school?
Intrinsically I know your position in these matters is fatally flawed.
Doesn't really help, does it? Claiming that we know certain things intrinsically.
The real world is pretty screwed up, don't you think?
And...?
Are you suggesting that you prefer to just assume your ideas are right because it's too traumatic to actually check them?
Why not?
I've tested my ideas over time and they are quite sound, although admittedly radical by modern standards.
I'm too lazy to do the research (and it's not that important to me).
You seem to be contradicting yourself.
You say you have tested them, yet you are not that interested in pursuing it (post 52).
You also say that you have tested them, you claim you are also too lazy to do the research.
And despite having tested your position, can't give examples of the sort of thing you were talking about in post 38, where you said, "I believe that without the belief in evolution some discoveries would not be made, even if they might have been."
Can you see why I have trouble accepting what you say?
Perhaps you didn't understand what I meant. Search "Accidental Discoveries".
The only place my theories fail is here (it's almost like being married again).
So you're now saying we can agree, and we do know what it means?We can agree, if we are honest.
Maybe this is the only place they're critically examined...The only place my theories fail is here (it's almost like being married again).
So you're now saying we can agree, and we do know what it means?
That's the complete opposite of what you agreed earlier... meh.
I get what you mean, yet these discoveries support evolution, since they were made based on it. Why do you not consider that evidence that evolution is correct?
Maybe this is the only place they're critically examined...
Evolution is way too mysterious, giant unexplained leaps, etc.
That's easy to say, but the disagreements remain, and it seems likely that the parties involved will maintain they're being honest - and, for all we know, sincerely believe that.I used a qualifier: honesty.
That's easy to say, but the disagreements remain, and it seems likely that the parties involved will maintain they're being honest - and, for all we know, sincerely believe that.
My question remains.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?