Plagued by doubts

jd01

Active Member
Dec 12, 2011
163
11
Nova Scotia, Canada
✟3,330.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
Spunkn said:
Jesus quoted OT Scripture all the time. The OT is part of the Bible. It is an essential part of the Bible, because it is the foundation. The God of the Bible is the same God as in the New Testament. Jesus says over and over in the New Testament, that He and God the Father are one. If you claim that the "God of the OT" is different, then you are claiming Jesus to be a liar. He is not a vengeful God. It's true, God treated people differently back then, but that's because it was before the Age of Grace, which we are in now, because of Christ.

God is the same, in the OT as He is in the NT. He is the same forever and always. If you cannot accept God in the OT, then you give up God entirely.

Well keeping in mind that the Gospels are not transcripts of what Jesus said, he probably did quote the OT. Why? Because he was talking to people who where steeped in the OT. And when he did quote the OT it was to buttress his subversive message of love. True the OT is part of the Bible, but so what? Does that mean we can't question it? Foundation? Foundation for what? It certainly is NOT the foundation of what Jesus taught. That s why we are Christians and not followers of the OT.

God treats people differently depending on the time we live in? I have a feeling that this is one of those wacky positions you have to take to make the OT fit with the NT.
 
Upvote 0

Spunkn

Newbie
Jan 19, 2013
2,989
298
Nebraska
✟19,890.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Why would Jesus choose to use the O.T. to speak truth, if in fact, it wasn't truth? He did not speak of it, just to "relate" to people, He used it, to prove to people that it was to be trusted, that it was truth. If the O.T. is not truth, then Jesus was a liar.

Jesus believed in the O.T. why do you doubt it?

Genesis is the foundation for all things. Why are we here? God created. Why is there pain and suffering? Man chose to disobey God. It's the foundation for marriage, and many other things.

It is the very foundation of the bible. You question the O.T. because you see God as cruel and unjust, when that isn't the case. God is Holy and He has every right to kill someone as He sees fit. People want to make God their own definition of love, and make Him out to be some God who won't punish anyone. That's simply not true. There are consequences for disobeying God. We ALL deserve punishment. Every day He grants us life, is a gift of His mercy, because none of us deserve it, for we have all chosen to disobey God.

Perhaps I worded it badly. There were different rules, that had to be followed in the O.T. Laws such as stoning an adulterer, laws such as sacrificing a lamb, not eating certain foods etc. We are no longer under those laws today, because of Christ. We are in a New Covenant.
 
Upvote 0

jd01

Active Member
Dec 12, 2011
163
11
Nova Scotia, Canada
✟3,330.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
Spunkn said:
Why would Jesus choose to use the O.T. to speak truth, if in fact, it wasn't truth? He did not speak of it, just to "relate" to people, He used it, to prove to people that it was to be trusted, that it was truth. If the O.T. is not truth, then Jesus was a liar.

Jesus believed in the O.T. why do you doubt it?

Genesis is the foundation for all things. Why are we here? God created. Why is there pain and suffering? Man chose to disobey God. It's the foundation for marriage, and many other things.

It is the very foundation of the bible. You question the O.T. because you see God as cruel and unjust, when that isn't the case. God is Holy and He has every right to kill someone as He sees fit. People want to make God their own definition of love, and make Him out to be some God who won't punish anyone. That's simply not true. There are consequences for disobeying God. We ALL deserve punishment. Every day He grants us life, is a gift of His mercy, because none of us deserve it, for we have all chosen to disobey God.

Perhaps I worded it badly. There were different rules, that had to be followed in the O.T. Laws such as stoning an adulterer, laws such as sacrificing a lamb, not eating certain foods etc. We are no longer under those laws today, because of Christ. We are in a New Covenant.

Jesus spook in parables, occasionally referring to the OT. He used the tools at hand. And he taught against the OT. That's the whole point of his ministry.
Under the OT genocide, mass rape and slavery are ok.
 
Upvote 0

Spunkn

Newbie
Jan 19, 2013
2,989
298
Nebraska
✟19,890.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Jesus spook in parables, occasionally referring to the OT. He used the tools at hand. And he taught against the OT. That's the whole point of his ministry.
Under the OT genocide, mass rape and slavery are ok.

Jesus quoted the O.T. outside of parables.

But we can argue about this all day. You seem convinced that the God of the OT is somehow different from Jesus, when Jesus Himself claimed to be One with the Father, who is the God of the OT. I don't know how much more plainly I can state that.
 
Upvote 0

asiyreh

God is salvation
Mar 14, 2012
1,433
62
Ireland
✟9,457.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Well keeping in mind that the Gospels are not transcripts of what Jesus said, he probably did quote the OT. Why? Because he was talking to people who where steeped in the OT. And when he did quote the OT it was to buttress his subversive message of love. True the OT is part of the Bible, but so what? Does that mean we can't question it? Foundation? Foundation for what? It certainly is NOT the foundation of what Jesus taught. That s why we are Christians and not followers of the OT.

God treats people differently depending on the time we live in? I have a feeling that this is one of those wacky positions you have to take to make the OT fit with the NT.

No Jd some whacky Christians adopt the position despite their being a need for it. And furthermore the Old and The New testament fit together quite nicely. Hair raisingly so it some places.

Now if you want to deny the existence of your Creator then you're welcome to. You will find any rabbit hole you can. Little apparent contradictions in the bible, that you in your splendor think that we, that is 2000 years worth of theologians into the study of covenant theology haven't thought about.

Now I think the reason you are here is because it bothers you that there's a certain law upon your heart. It sounds awfully like the law of the God of the bible. So here you are wondering have we the servants of Christ got answers to your questions. And the answer is always, always Yes. Might take us a little while to dig them out, you may even have to wait months, or years for a new discovery but yes and always. Christ is the Way and yes, we are really really sure.
 
Upvote 0

jd01

Active Member
Dec 12, 2011
163
11
Nova Scotia, Canada
✟3,330.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
asiyreh said:
No Jd some whacky Christians adopt the position despite their being a need for it. And furthermore the Old and The New testament fit together quite nicely. Hair raisingly so it some places.

Now if you want to deny the existence of your Creator then you're welcome to. You will find any rabbit hole you can. Little apparent contradictions in the bible, that you in your splendor think that we, that is 2000 years worth of theologians into the study of covenant theology haven't thought about.

Now I think the reason you are here is because it bothers you that there's a certain law upon your heart. It sounds awfully like the law of the God of the bible. So here you are wondering have we the servants of Christ got answers to your questions. And the answer is always, always Yes. Might take us a little while to dig them out you may even have to wait months or years for a new discovery but yes and always. Christ is the Way and yes we are really really sure.

Asiyreh,

Thank you. You mistake my objections to the OT as denial of Jesus and God. Not so.

Non-doctrinal answers to my questions. Still waiting.

And appeals to authority are always to be derided.
 
Upvote 0

Peripatetic

Restless mind, peaceful soul.
Feb 28, 2010
3,179
219
✟22,095.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Can you specify the purported variations and differences that you are referring to?

This whole thread has devolved into a series of debates, and I apologize for my part in them. Debates are not permitted in this sub-forum according to the rules.

This sub-forum "is for new Christians to ask questions and be encouraged by other Christians" (per the statement of purpose). These topics would be better served in the Theology sub-forums.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

asiyreh

God is salvation
Mar 14, 2012
1,433
62
Ireland
✟9,457.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Asiyreh,

Thank you. You mistake my objections to the OT as denial of Jesus and God. Not so.

Non-doctrinal answers to my questions. Still waiting.

And appeals to authority are always to be derided.

So you carry the icon of a christian seeker because you are, and yet are not finished seeking for him? Your reasons for wearing that particular badge are of course you own. However it's socially accepted around these parts those who wear the badge of seeker are usually ordinary agnostics .
 
Upvote 0

SharonL

Senior Veteran
Oct 15, 2005
9,957
1,099
Texas
Visit site
✟23,316.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi Moonseeker:

You've taken the first step - if you have ask Jesus to be Lord of your Life - your name is written in the Lamb's Book of Life. God knows your heart - now just grow in the knowledge of walking hand in hand with Jesus. The Bible tells us He is your friend, just talk to Him like a friend. He is closer than your shadow and only a heartbeat away - you are never alone.

There is no need to look at the athesists sites - the enemy will make sure he puts doubt in your mind and a hook in your jaw that will keep you coming back to check them out - don't do it - it is far more uplifting to study about a loving Jesus who died for you - not one mocking your faith.

Read all you want and talk to Jesus - but above all else - just go find a quiet place and sit down and talk to Jesus - look at the birds - how does that little bird know how to build that nest and how to prepare for baby birds - you will learn so much just watching nature and ask yourself - how could this be if there is no God. There are no other answers than a loving God.

Hold out your hand and follow the blood lines - how could a big bang place those blood vessels throughout your body and cause eyes to see and ears to hear. Feel the heartbeat - how could so much love be in a heart that was not created by a loving God.

Each day will be a learning, loving experience as you discover God's love and careing. Keep in mind the earth is the devil's kingdom and he has created the sin that is in it - so no blame goes to God for the evil that is in this world, but Jesus will return to set it all straight very soon. Blessings
 
Upvote 0

jd01

Active Member
Dec 12, 2011
163
11
Nova Scotia, Canada
✟3,330.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
asiyreh said:
So you carry the icon of a christian seeker because you are, and yet are not finished seeking for him? Your reasons for wearing that particular badge are of course you own. However it's socially accepted around these parts those who wear the badge of seeker are usually ordinary agnostics .

I do not follow.
 
Upvote 0

asiyreh

God is salvation
Mar 14, 2012
1,433
62
Ireland
✟9,457.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Icon.jpg


Theres actually 2 kinds of Agnostics. Theres the ordinary agnostic which means that you DONT know anything for sure. Then theres the ornery agnostic which means you CANT know anything for sure. Being an ornery agnostic is just self defeating because if you cant KNOW anything for sure then how do you KNOW for sure that you cant KNOW anything for sure. Ordinary agnostics dont know if God exist because they dont see any evidence that he exist.Clayt Yahoo answers
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
B

Bible2

Guest
SharonL said in post 85:

Read all you want and talk to Jesus - but above all else - just go find a quiet place and sit down and talk to Jesus - look at the birds - how does that little bird know how to build that nest and how to prepare for baby birds - you will learn so much just watching nature and ask yourself - how could this be if there is no God. There are no other answers than a loving God.

Indeed. And God is always aware of each of the little birds, so how much more is he always aware of each of us (Luke 12:6-9)?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
B

Bible2

Guest
asiyreh quoted "Clayt Yahoo answers" in post 87:

Ordinary agnostics dont know if God exist because they dont see any evidence that he exist.

People can know God exists simply by seeing everything else that exists (Rom. 1:20, Ps. 19:1-4). The universe couldn't have created itself from nothing by physics, because of the first law of thermodynamics. So something outside of physics had to have created the universe. The term spirit is used to refer to that which exists but is outside of physics. So what created the universe was a spirit (Jn. 4:24, 1:3). And there has to be an uncreated spirit, because nothing, not even a spirit, can create itself from nothing, for in order to create itself, it would have to already exist. The term divine can be used to refer to a conscious entity which exists but is uncreated. So the uncreated spirit who created the universe would be divine. So just by being able to see the universe, people have no excuse for denying the existence of a divine uncreated spirit (Rom. 1:20, Jn. 4:24, Ps. 19:1-4). And this spirit must have eternal power (Rom. 1:20), because the first law of thermodynamics requires the energy in the universe is eternal.

Because knowing God exists is the only reasonable response to seeing the existence of the universe (Rom. 1:20), when educated & intelligent people refuse to admit God exists, this is only because they're intentionally choosing to be unreasonable, choosing to be foolish, regarding God's existence, because of their human pride, their unthankfulness to God, & their desire to continue in sinful actions (Rom. 1:21-22, Ps. 14:1). But there's no salvation in simply believing God exists (Jas. 2:19). Believing in Jesus Christ, the human/divine Son of God, & his sacrifice on the Cross for our sins & his rising from the dead on the 3rd day, is the only way for people to have their sins forgiven so they can avoid having to go to hell when they die (Jn. 3:16,36, Rom. 3:25, 1 Cor. 15:1-4).
 
Upvote 0
B

Bible2

Guest
jd01 said in post 74:

That s why we are Christians and not followers of the OT.

Christians are followers of both the Old Testament and the New Testament, because both are scripture, inspired by God (2 Timothy 3:15-17).

*******

jd01 said in post 76:

And he taught against the OT.

Jesus in no way taught against the Old Testament per se, but confirmed that the Old Testament is true (Matthew 5:17-18, Luke 24:44-48). What Jesus contradicted in the Old Testament was the letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law, which, while it remains true (Romans 7:12), it's just no longer in effect for people. For Jesus shows in the Sermon on the Mount how his New Covenant, Christian commandments are even stricter than the letter of the commandments of the Old Covenant Mosaic law. For the letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law forbade murder (Matthew 5:21, Exodus 20:13), whereas Jesus' New Covenant law forbids even calling people names (Matthew 5:22). Also, the letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law forbade adultery (Matthew 5:27, Exodus 20:14), whereas Jesus' New Covenant law forbids even looking at another woman with lust (Matthew 5:28). Also, the letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law permitted divorce and remarriage (Matthew 5:31, Deuteronomy 24:1-2), whereas Jesus' New Covenant law forbids it (Matthew 5:32, Mark 10:11-12, Luke 16:18), except for a single exemption granted only to husbands who discover that their newlywed wife is not a virgin, but had committed fornication (Matthew 19:9).

Jesus also shows in the Sermon on the Mount that while his New Covenant, Christian law is stricter than the letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law, at the same time it is also more merciful. For the letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law required taking an eye for an eye (Matthew 5:38, Deuteronomy 19:21), whereas Jesus' New Covenant law requires turning the other cheek (Matthew 5:39). Also, the letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law required hatred for one's enemies (Matthew 5:43, Deuteronomy 23:6), whereas Jesus' New Covenant law requires love for one's enemies (Matthew 5:44). Also, the letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law, the ministration of death (2 Corinthians 3:7), required, for example, that adulterers be put to death (Leviticus 20:10), whereas Jesus showed mercy to the woman caught in adultery (John 8:4-11). And, for another example, the letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law required that anyone who does any work on the sabbath is to be put to death (Exodus 31:14, Numbers 15:32-36), whereas Jesus allowed his disciples to work on the sabbath and said that they were guiltless (Matthew 12:1-8), just as Jesus himself worked on the sabbath (John 5:17-18).

So in obeying Jesus' New Covenant commandments (Matthew 5:19 to 7:29, John 14:15; 1 Corinthians 14:37), believers, whether Jews or Gentiles, are both more merciful and loving, and they also exceed in righteousness those who try to keep the abolished letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law (Matthew 5:20-48, Ephesians 2:15-16, Colossians 2:14-17, Romans 7:6; 2 Corinthians 3:6-18, Hebrews 7:18-19).

jd01 said in post 76:

Under the OT genocide, mass rape and slavery are ok.

Regarding Old Testament genocide, are you thinking of 1 Samuel 15:3? If so, even babies are sinful (Psalms 58:3, Psalms 51:5, Romans 3:10), because of original sin (Romans 5:19a). And as the Creator of all babies, God has the right to decide what to do with them, even before they are born (Romans 9:11-24). Also, in Deuteronomy 5:17, "kill" meant murder (Matthew 19:18), not capital punishment (Deuteronomy 17:5-7, Romans 13:4).

Regarding mass rape, what verses are you referring to?

Regarding slavery, the Old Testament forbade the cruel treatment of slaves (Leviticus 25:43, Exodus 21:26-27) or the return of escaped slaves to their masters (Deuteronomy 23:15-16). Similarly, the New Testament commands the right treatment of slaves (Colossians 4:1), and commands slaves to obtain freedom from mortal masters if they are able to (1 Corinthians 7:21). But saved people are to remain the voluntary slaves of Jesus Christ (Romans 1:1, Romans 6:22, Revelation 1:1), who has freed them from slavery to sin (John 8:34-36), and offers them eternal life (Romans 6:22-23).

Christians need to be very wary of the idea that the Old Testament or its God (YHWH) are evil. For the person whom the Antichrist will revile is YHWH (Revelation 13:6, Daniel 11:36), whom many people mistakenly think of as being (in their words) "the God of only the Old Testament, that cruel and hateful God who ordered people to commit genocide and kill babies (1 Samuel 15:3), while Jesus came and preached love for everyone (Matthew 5:44)". The truth is that Jesus confirmed that the God of the Old Testament, YHWH (Deuteronomy 6:4-5, Leviticus 19:18), is the same as the God of the New Testament (Mark 12:29-31), and that the Old Testament is true (Matthew 5:17-18, Luke 24:44-48). Jesus died for our sins in fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy from YHWH (Isaiah 53; 1 Peter 2:24). And he rose from the dead in fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy from YHWH (for example, Psalms 16:10, Acts 2:31). Jesus died to establish the New Covenant (Matthew 26:28), which YHWH had foretold in the Old Testament (Jeremiah 31:31-34). And Jesus died to bring about the defeat of Satan (Hebrews 2:14), which YHWH had foretold from even the first book of the Old Testament (Genesis 3:15).

Nonetheless, building on many people's misconceptions of YHWH as being (in their words) "the cruel God of the Old Testament", no doubt one of the Antichrist's chief blasphemies against YHWH (Revelation 13:6, Daniel 11:36) will be that YHWH is an evil god. This is one of the ancient blasphemies of Gnosticism, another being the antichrist lie that Christ isn't in the flesh (2 John 1:7). The world will be deceived into completely rejecting YHWH and worshipping Satan and the Antichrist instead (Revelation 13:4-8, Revelation 12:9). Satan could be worshipped not as "Satan", which most everyone sees as a bad name (it means "Adversary"), but as "Lucifer" (Isaiah 14:12), which means "the morning star". The Antichrist could lie and say that it's YHWH who is the true "Satan", the true "Adversary" of mankind.

Also, it's important for Christians to realize that during the Antichrist's future, literal 3.5-year worldwide reign (Revelation 13:5,7), even though the world will worship both Lucifer (the dragon, Satan) and the Antichrist (the individual-man aspect of the beast) (Revelation 13:4-8, Revelation12:9), this won't require that the Antichrist's one-world religion will say that Jesus is evil, or will turn the world against Jesus. For almost the entire world reveres Jesus, at least as being a good man. The Antichrist could confirm this basic world belief, but simply (in his words) "clarify" that while Jesus is indeed a good man, Jesus himself isn't the Christ or the Son of God (1 John 2:22). No doubt the Antichrist will also deny that Jesus died on the Cross for our sins, as this, just as believing that Jesus is the Christ and the Son of God (John 20:31, John 3:36), is one of the core beliefs of the gospel by which people become saved (1 Corinthians 15:1-4).

So what the Antichrist could do is keep the idea of a good Jesus, but strip it of everything by which Jesus saves people from hell. And this wouldn't require that the Antichrist deny Jesus' second coming. Indeed, the Antichrist and his False Prophet (Revelation 19:20) could even try to employ to their own ends the Biblical prophecy of Jesus' second coming, as well as the Muslim prophecy which says that the miracle-working prophet Jesus will return bodily from heaven in the last days to bring the whole earth into the worship of the true God. For the False Prophet could claim that he is Jesus, returned to bring the whole earth into the worship of the true God. And he could perform amazing miracles (Revelation 13:13) as purported proof of his claim (compare John 3:2). This is one reason why it's so important to know when and how the real Jesus' second coming will happen (Matthew 24:29-31; 2 Thessalonians 2:1-8; 1 Thessalonians 4:14-17, Revelation 19:7 to 20:6, Zechariah 14:3-21).

Once the False Prophet by his amazing miracles has brought the world under his spell (Revelation 13:13-18, Revelation 19:20), including many Muslims and Christians who may not care much for scriptural dogma but could go wild over his signs and wonders, he could begin to (in his words) "restore to the world the real message which was spoken by me (Jesus) at my first coming, and by the great prophet Mohammed, but which message became corrupted by power-hungry men when they copied and changed the early manuscripts of the Bible and the Koran". He could then gradually initiate the world into the Antichrist's Gnostic Luciferianism (1 John 4:3, Revelation 13:4-6), a religion which could have existed since ancient times in some "mystery" cults, and which still exists today in the highest degree of initiation of a worldwide secret society. The False Prophet could present his miraculously calling fire down from heaven (Revelation 13:13) as purported proof that Lucifer (the dragon, Satan) and the Antichrist are the true God (Revelation 13:4-8, Revelation 12:9), in an inversion of how back in Old Testament times, Elijah miraculously called fire down from heaven to prove that YHWH is the true God (1 Kings 18:37-39).

Because the Antichrist and his False Prophet (possibly masquerading as Jesus) will deny that Jesus is the Christ (1 John 2:22) and will deny that Christ is in the flesh (1 John 4:3), and because they will bring the world into the worship of Lucifer (the dragon, Satan) instead (Revelation 13:4, Revelation 12:9), they could lie and say that (the non-mortal flesh) Lucifer is the Christ, that the new name of Christ (Revelation 3:12c) is "Lucifer Christ". For just as "Lucifer" means "the morning star", so Christ is the morning star (Revelation 22:16b). Also, Christ identified himself with the serpent (John 3:14), and Lucifer is the serpent (Revelation 12:9). Also, Christ said "Ye are gods" (John 10:34), and it was the serpent who said "ye shall be as gods" (Genesis 3:5).

The truth is that Lucifer fell from his office of morning star (Isaiah 14:12) and became Satan (compare Luke 10:18). Jesus Christ has taken over the office of morning star (Revelation 22:16). And Jesus Christ identified himself with only the brass serpent on the pole in Numbers 21:8-9 (John 3:14), which typified Jesus Christ's crucifixion for our sins (John 19:16, Matthew 26:28). And in John 10:34, Jesus Christ (John 20:31) was quoting YHWH in Psalms 82:6-7, which shows that even though humans have knowledge of good and evil as gods do (Genesis 3:22), they will still die like humans (Psalms 82:7), contradicting the serpent's lie (Genesis 3:4). Nonetheless, the Antichrist could falsely say that Lucifer is the Christ and the true and beneficent God of mankind, and that the False Prophet is the miracle-working prophet Jesus (John 3:2, Acts 3:22-24), returned to point the world to the true Christ/God. The Antichrist could falsely say that he (the Antichrist) is the human/divine "Son" of Lucifer, who must be worshipped as God along with Lucifer (Revelation 13:4,8). This would be similar to how Biblical Christians now rightly worship the human/divine Jesus Christ (John 1:1,14) as God (the Son) along with God the Father (John 20:28, Hebrews 1:8).
 
Upvote 0

asiyreh

God is salvation
Mar 14, 2012
1,433
62
Ireland
✟9,457.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Good post bible2, bit meaty for this section of the forum though, don't you think?

Prefer the "Historical" view of revelation myself. But this is a nice take on things, interesting read, cheers bro.

The correlation between Christ the morning star and Satan the morning star is the result of the translation into English. The one were we get the term "Lucifer" - heylel is a Hebrew noun, the one referring to Christ is a Greek description, there's differences there if you check out an interlinear translation.

You do however occasionally get this type of "dual application" of symbolic references in the bible, when cross referencing apocalyptic literature. If I remember correctly both Satan and Christ are referred to as a lion, or the roar of a lion. The symbolic use of the lion denotes a powerful ruler and his roar, the command that issues.

Lion here doesn't mean Christ or Satan, just a powerful ruler. If I was the king of Ireland for example, I might be referred to in apocalyptic literature as the young lion of Ireland - :yum:
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
B

Bible2

Guest
asiyreh said in post 91:

The correlation between Christ the morning star and Satan the morning star is the result of the translation into English.

It's also a result of the meaning of the original Hebrew and Greek words involved. For in Isaiah 14:12, the original Hebrew word (heylel, H1966) translated as "Lucifer" in the KJV, and as "morning star" in the NIV, means "the morning star" (Strong's Hebrew Dictionary, word #1966). The KJV translates it as "Lucifer" because in English, "Lucifer", in its etymology, means "the morning star" (Webster's English Dictionary, etymology for "Lucifer"). And in Revelation 22:16, the original Greek word (proinos, G4407) translated as "morning" means "pertaining to the dawn" (Strong's Greek Dictionary, word #4407), and the original Greek word (aster, G0792) translated as "star" means "a star" (Strong's Greek Dictionary, word #792).

So the Antichrist (the individual-man aspect of the beast), who will bring the world into the worship of Lucifer (the dragon, Satan) (Revelation 13:4, Revelation 12:9), could falsely claim that Lucifer is Christ. For "Lucifer" (Isaiah 14:12, KJV) means "the morning star", and Christ says that he (Christ) is the morning star (Revelation 22:16). But the Antichrist will not say that Lucifer is Jesus, because the Antichrist will deny that Jesus is the Christ (1 John 2:22). The truth is that Jesus is the Christ (John 20:31), and that Lucifer fell from his office of morning star (Isaiah 14:12) and became Satan (compare Luke 10:18). "Jesus" Christ has taken over the office of morning star (Revelation 22:16). This is not to say that the office of Christ and the office of morning star are one and the same. It simply means that Jesus can hold both offices at the same time.

asiyreh said in post 91:

If I remember correctly both Satan and Christ are referred to as a lion, or the roar of a lion.

That's right, but Satan is referred to as an evil lion (1 Peter 5:8), whereas Christ is referred to as a good lion (Revelation 5:5).
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums