• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Performing a Baptism?

Status
Not open for further replies.

JWBZ SVT

Active Member
Jan 5, 2005
315
21
Mississippi
✟23,056.00
Faith
Christian
I would *think* so but I don't know for sure. I've been doing some thinking about this myself.

One of my thoughts was the man as head of the household and spiritual leader of his house should at least be able to baptise his children. (?) But, call me whatever, I think I'd rather go to an ordained minister.
 
Upvote 0

CITFH

Regular Member
Oct 15, 2004
267
20
45
The "D"
Visit site
✟23,000.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
I say go for it. I see no scripture that contradicts the believer from baptising another believer. John the Baptist never went to seminary...granted his last name was, "the Baptist" ;) ...but the point is, Christianity is not voodoo hocus pocus. It is a faith made to be inacted in community, not hierarchy. Thats just my shoot from the hip...if this becomes a holy war thread i might do more research ;) lol
 
Upvote 0

Cjwinnit

Advocatus Diaboli (Retired)
Jun 28, 2004
2,965
131
England.
✟26,428.00
Faith
Anglican
Yes, but..

Ther has to be the correct form and intent. By form, use the words "I baptise you in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit" and baptising using water. By intent is such that a baptism without intent doesn't count (e.g. a baptism in a threatre or onscreen where it isn't meant.)

I'd do it in church but whatever floats your boat.
 
Upvote 0

CITFH

Regular Member
Oct 15, 2004
267
20
45
The "D"
Visit site
✟23,000.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
In the New Testament, in the second chapter of the book of Paul (from the "contra scrolls of Qumran"); The apostle writes,:liturgy:

"when baptising, search among you for one who is ordained by a counsel of mere men. If no such man can be summoned; one who has the Spirit may in the following way baptise in lieu of said ordained minister. Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, "B," "A," "B," "A," Select, Start' and said believer will be given infinite life"

That settles it for me...
 
Upvote 0

DaveKerwin

Represent the Most High
May 31, 2002
4,633
132
44
Detroit, MI
Visit site
✟28,531.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yeaaaa,

there is no magic forumula in my book. I baptized my little sister and my buddy from youth group. They asked me because of spiritual significance in their lives, so I glady agreed. You normally do not see average joe church goer doing baptisms, but I think we should see more of that.
 
Upvote 0

JWBZ SVT

Active Member
Jan 5, 2005
315
21
Mississippi
✟23,056.00
Faith
Christian
CITFH said:
In the New Testament, in the second chapter of the book of Paul (from the "contra scrolls of Qumran"); The apostle writes,:liturgy:

"when baptising, search among you for one who is ordained by a counsel of mere men. If no such man can be summoned; one who has the Spirit may in the following way baptise in lieu of said ordained minister. Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, "B," "A," "B," "A," Select, Start' and said believer will be given infinite life"

That settles it for me...


LOL...I used to use that EXACT 'formula' when I played Contra on Nintendo. :p It's good for like 30 extra lives! :D
 
Upvote 0

Redguard

Make It So, Number One!
Oct 20, 2004
12,268
1,927
Toronto, Canada
Visit site
✟43,960.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Liberals
Interesting.

I joined a Men's Prayer group in my church back in October. The guy who heads the group performed the baptism for one of the guys who accepted Christ by way of coming to the group and accepting Jesus.

Apparently, it caused a lot of humbugging in the church since he's not an ordained pastor or anything, but he argued (privately, not publically) that he sees no text or writing that suggests one must be an ordained pastor to perform a baptism.
 
Upvote 0

SJBrian

Active Member
Oct 20, 2004
43
1
54
✟187.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Well guys... I love the response this question has raised. I have thought about it and prayed about it for the past several days and I believe the answer, for me at least, was placed in my heart so I thought I'd share it with you.


If my brother in law wants to baptize me then that's fine with me and if he wants to be baptized with my by a minister that is also fine with me. It doesn't really matter - what matters is that it's done for the right reasons!

I saw a baptism as a wedding ring the other day and I truely believe this answer was given to me. If a couple get's married for the right reasons they are a couple before they ever perform the ceremony. The ring means nothing other than an outward sign of your devotion to your partner. Without my ring I am still just as married in my heart as I am with it on! A baptism I feel should represent the same thing. An outward sign of your love for Christ and your devotion to him and a promise to live the best you can in his way. Who does it is not important and it's your love for him unconditionally that truly matters.

Keep the responses coming though - I'd love to see more!
 
Upvote 0

Telrunya

Student of the Word
Jun 24, 2004
1,906
120
55
Bainbridge Island Washington St.
✟2,747.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
PastorBH said:
I believe that baptism (and communion for that matter) are given to the church to administer. While that is said, I don't believe that the church exists because of the ordinace, but rather the ordinace exists because of the church.

But haven't we as the collective church been made into a nation of preists? We are all ordained by God to spread the Good News. Our church has many home groups and as leader of my home group I preform baptisms and administer communion. Yet I haven't been to seminary (Heck I'm a high school drop out).

To really answer this question we have to answer what is the purpose of a baptism. We are baptized as a declaration that we are taking part in Jesus' death and resurrection because baptism is symbolic of Jesus' death and resurrection. It is an interaction of obediance of the new believer to God. No where does scripture say there must be witnesses to this interaction so it is not for the church body but for the individual. If it is for the individual and it is an act of obediance and a declaration of submission to God then anyone else involved in the process is really kind of unimportant. The focus is on God and the new believer. It is an honor accorded to the person performing the baptism to be a part of that sacred interaction between the new believer and God. I would say that honor belongs to the one who was instrumental (God's instrument) in bringing the new believer to Christ.
 
Upvote 0

holo

former Christian
Dec 24, 2003
8,992
751
✟92,794.00
Country
Norway
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Johnnz said:
One of the great tradegies of church history has been the professionalism of 'the ministry'.

John
NZ
Ooh, you just might be my kind of guy. Please elaborate.

As for the OT, it doesn't matter if we're ordained or not, because we're all priests now, ordained by God.
 
Upvote 0

PastorBH

Active Member
Oct 16, 2004
228
14
✟22,933.00
Faith
Baptist
Telrunya said:
But haven't we as the collective church been made into a nation of preists? We are all ordained by God to spread the Good News. Our church has many home groups and as leader of my home group I preform baptisms and administer communion. Yet I haven't been to seminary (Heck I'm a high school drop out).

To really answer this question we have to answer what is the purpose of a baptism. We are baptized as a declaration that we are taking part in Jesus' death and resurrection because baptism is symbolic of Jesus' death and resurrection. It is an interaction of obediance of the new believer to God. No where does scripture say there must be witnesses to this interaction so it is not for the church body but for the individual. If it is for the individual and it is an act of obediance and a declaration of submission to God then anyone else involved in the process is really kind of unimportant. The focus is on God and the new believer. It is an honor accorded to the person performing the baptism to be a part of that sacred interaction between the new believer and God. I would say that honor belongs to the one who was instrumental (God's instrument) in bringing the new believer to Christ.


Christ gave baptism and communion to the church in Matt. 28. Paul the apostle rebukes the church at Corinth for not properly handeling the ordinance of Communion 1 Cor.11. Every body in the New Testament that was baptized (exercised saving faith first) were 'added to the church' in Acts 2:41. There is an relationship between the ordinances to the church. There is also a forgotten aspect to baptism that we have lost, and that is people that were baptized assoc. themselves publicly with Christ, back before there was such a thing as religious freedom. That is why the church was persecuted. Philip was sent by the Holy Spirit to witness to the Eunuch in Acts 8, later Philip baptized him (v.36), who was Philip? He was a deacon, and an evangelist from the church in Antioch.
I suggest reading 1 Cor. 11, there you will see that Communion, as an ordinance is given to the church to be performed by the church and that it actually is daming to perform it without the church. Read Acts, every one who got baptized joined themselves into the fellowship of the church.
I say, that if someone wants to get baptized BUT don't want to fellowship with other believers is truly a departure from the Biblical pattern.
It is the Bible that defines baptism, communion, and church. By this i just mean that I don't take it upon myself to baptize somebody because I think its apropo, or that I can just have church 'at home' and not worry about actually assembling with fellow believers.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.