- Apr 25, 2016
- 35,930
- 20,221
- 45
- Country
- Australia
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Anglican
- Marital Status
- Married
What traditional masculinity once meant was taking responsibility onto oneself and stepping up to the plate and taking care of a wife and family. Masculine roles were based in the need society has for fathers being the core of the family unit, to take on roles that male physiology and testosterone make men particularly adept at.
The alternative to that role is not having those kind of expectations operates on the principle of vice versa. Like the magic principle is as above so below, vice versa is that once the ideal of my body, my choice is accepted, then vice versa. Not my choice, not my responsibility.
Without any incentives to take on responsibility, the victimhood model of David French and male rights activists miss the mark. Life for males without responsibilities being a prerequisite for being a man, modern life for the modern male is a lot of fun. Video games are funnier than diapers, pornography is available for any male not matter how socially desirable he may be, minimal work is required to have a lot of fun.
Opioids are not a cry for help. They are a great feeling, and too much fun is a moral principle, not a factor in the pursuit for the best high possible.
Fatherhood is not a male physiological response. It is a social construct. Males are comaparively slow to maturity and it takes great effort to socialize those with a physiology more geared to adventure than to nurturance. It is learned behaviour, and when it is no longer taught as the normal, expected path, the male of this species have no problem pleasuring themselves to death.
Boys have been taught for generations now that girls are doing it for themselves, and they are mainly just fine with that.
Men in the West are exactly as we have been socially engineered to be.
Do women have a problem with that?
I think - from what I can see and hear from other women, as well as my own experience - women have a problem with the status quo, but would articulate it in different terms.
You look to a past where the father was "the core" of the family unit; that past had significant problems for women as a whole, and we've sought to correct some of those. That was not, however, an invitation for men to absolve themselves of responsibility; it was an invitation to partnership. The dismay of contemporary women seems to me, to be that too many men, offered a choice between partnering equally with a spouse, or acting like an additional child in the family, will opt for the latter. I've lost count of the number of times I've heard wives and mothers complain that their husbands act as if everything is the mental and emotional responsibility of their wives.
It seems terribly petty. "Oh, you're going to take on an equal role with me in life? Fine then. If I can't be in charge, I'm not interested." And a retreat to the pleasure and irresponsibility you describe so eloquently.
And then these men wake up one day to find they've been divorced because their wives have discerned - quite accurately - that they are better off without someone who doesn't pull his weight, and think that this is somehow all the women's fault. But how do you make someone who doesn't want to, take on responsibility?
Upvote
0