Ditto....\
Though I do think it's noteworthy to see how it doesn't really seem that ANYBODY (regardless of what side they're on) is really staying within the sections made for all to interact with others having the same thoughts, just as it'd be of differing communities complaining of the other inteferring with their children/space when at the city park....and not realizing that they tend to bring it on themselves when they choose not to play with others within the local parks of their own neighborhoods/streets and go to larger ones since there's more activity. Some things just come with the territory---and as long as all of us keep choosing to make threads in the general forum called "Messianic Judaim", either there's going to be forced segregation akin to "colored fountains" /"white fountains only" and seperate space as they occurred in the South...or there's going to be the dynamic of intergration of differing groups that disagree on a host of issues/learning to get along just like it occurrred in Southern history. Many times, others had to learn to get along if they were going to be in places that required them to share the same space...and while having their own spaces to talk amongst themselves/be with others of the same mind was good, there was the reality that either side trying to force the other to CONFORM to what it wanted in ALL Shared/Public spaces was not going to be effective. Either there was going to be all-out war..or peaceful/mutual dialouge...and for many, it was often the case that what caused the most trouble was pride. Each side wanting to have their own way, but only seeing the other do the same things they themselves did on certain occassions.
May we learn some lessons from the past. IMHO, seperate forums are a good idea/have worked---but just trying to keep everyone on their own side of the sandbox isn't going to address the larger issue that many of us simply DO NOT KNOW how to get along with those who are different than us. Many times, IMHO, it has seemed like people don't even know how to talk to one another considerately--and then when others respond or react, there's a fight and the assumption is "Well, we just need to part ways!!!!" rather than stepping back....and seeing how/where it was that basic skills of communication could've been developed. Being on other forums, this has often been something that has come up whenever it seems that people may spend more time talking AT one another rather than WITH one another in dialouge---and in sharing the same spaces, they don't know how to disagree on things AGREEABLY and be cordial.
I know I don't speak for all others..but personally, I think things could work in this scenario: Someone wants to discuss with others who may be Torah-Observant as they are....and a tag is made to indicate only those with the same mindsets are invited. Disagreements may occur within that thread, but they may be held to a minimum and it's generally "YES " men/women supporting one another...and the same dynamic can be done with other diversities of thought on the forum. However, for those who choose to come into the MAIN Forum that is not limited to one camp and they are open others with differing views coming in, what can make the conversation work is when others simply learn how to listen/interact according to James 3:13-18 or what Proverbs often notes when it comes to guarding our words. Other forums have had such success, including those beyond the scope of "CHRISTIAN Forums"---be it with Christians talking to Non-Christians on issues or with believers of differing camps coming together and sharing their own unique experiences for the sake of learning. This is the way it's done in the classroom of many professors and students--and I hope the same could happen here.
A Tag alone may not be necessary (nor other forums) to maintain peace/find ways to get along if there's not a concern on trying to make anyone agree with us in order for us to still love and learn from them. My saying this may be due to my own multicultural/multi-religious background where others from all camps were forced to be in limited spaces and look for ways to interact.....and it was a blast, even when I may've sharply disagreed with another.
Seriously, do I need a tag or another forum to talk with one who may differ sharply when it comes to things we can ALL find agreement on like sports, raising family/kids, sharing things we need prayer for, movies we enjoyed or things common to everyday life?? Do I need a tag in order to laugh with someone who may be in a camp I don't agree with? ANyone who has neighbors (as do we all) has to understand that they may go to places/things you may disagree with--and thus, the entire reason why there's seperation---yet that doesn't mean you can't come together on the block and find common ground. As you all live/interact in the same neighborhood, there's absolutely no reason as to why there needs to be a "cold war" of sorts. There's a way to talk with your neighbors in the morning when you take out the trash or..as what occurred in the old school...actually INVITE those different from you over to have a conversation since love/being Good Samaritans to one another (Luke 10:25-39) entailed that interaction not be based on agreement alone when it comes to helping one another. And if it can happen within that context, \why does it seem so difficult for all of us to do the same thing here?
Sometimes, it seems the the ways many of us interact with others are small....and I actually think it can be dishonorable to the Lord in how we can react to one another But again, that's just me based on what I've seen in the scriptures.
If a specifc tag is to be used, again, I don't knock it. I just think it may need to be examined more fully. Going back to the analogy of what occurred in the South, within that era, there was mixture and others had to learn how to interact by seeing where the other was coming from---and a label alone couldn't define someone fully since they often meant different things depending on the context. Not everyone, for example, who belonged to the Black Panthers was automatically against all others who were white...and not everyone saying they were militant meant that they were for terrorizing all people within a group (as some militants were), nor was it the case that all people saying they were for peaceful resistance/boycotting meant that they didn't have racist tendencies toward others outside of the "black vs white" spectrum...as even other groups outside of Black/White ethnicity faced stereotyping and deragatory comments by others within a camp.
Likewise, not everyone using a term needs to be pegged in ..nor do I think having a label alone will solve all things fully if there's not in-depth explanation. The labeling of tags on what specifc type of group is invited to discuss (i.e. "Torah Observant") can work, but as the very term means DIFFERENTLY to so many groups just like the term "Hebrew Christian" (which others often refer to one being for Hebrew Roots), there needs to be more explanation given in a tag (or a disclaimer) given on what type of TO they may be, just as it'd be with someone saying they believe in "Grace-Filled Torah Observance" as opposed to Torah observance being seen in the sense of legalism or adhering to all things within the Mosaic code.
"Grace filled" Torah observance, if wanting to see what it is all about, can be seen in the apostle Paul----for he spoke and wrote proudly that he is, not was, a Pharisee (Acts 23:6; Phil. 3:5), yet his understanding of the Kingdom of Christ/its principles helped him to appreciate the Old with the New. It is why it was clear from text that he felt the OT had principles to learn from it in the multiple times he referenced it-whether in 1 Corinthians 10:1-13 in citing the examples of the failures of the Israelites with sexual immorality/grumbling and saying they happened as OUR EXAMPLES/WARNINGS for us today
.or in his citing of Deuteronomy 25:3-5 when it came to Church Planters in 1 Corinthians 9:8-10/ 1 Corinthians 9 (and also, 1 Timothy 5:17-19 ) concerning supporting.
The same goes for Paul in his referencing/citing Exodus 16:17-19 in regards to gathering when he spoke on being a generous giver in 2 Corinthians 8:14-16. Add to that 2 Corinthians 4:12-14 when he referenced Psalm 116:10. Dozens of other examples besides this, as well as plenty of scholary books/references on the issue of how those within the first 3 centuries of the Church actually referenced the examples of the saints for Church Practice/Encouragement.
He made clear he did nothing against the Law ( Acts 25:7-9, Acts 24:13-15 , Acts 28:22-24 )--with his teachings making others zealous for the Law ( Acts 21:19-21, Acts 21:23-25, etc)---yet within that, He never sought to make it out as if Gentiles were bound to keep all of the codes of the Mosaic Law at all....and even he was willing to do whatever it took to reach them/be all things to all people (I Corinthians 9), within the boundaries God gave them. He understood, as Romans 2 indicates, that even the Gentiles/those without law become a law unto themselves and live out many of the things the Law requires---and thus, its why He later went on in Romans 13 to discuss how love fulfills the requirements of the Law and has always done so.
The people at Rosh Pina Project have done some excellent work on discussing that very issue, as seen here:
- "Antinomian Theology Within The TOM-J Movement « The Rosh Pina Project (an alternative look at Messianic Jews)" ( )