Whoa...pump the brakes. He can't suggest that his attack was racially motivated? Is that what you're saying?
He refers to being a "white boy" outrunning "black guys" as if they're supposed to catch him because they're black.
I get that it doesn't reflect every flesh tone...I get that it's factually incorrect. I don't get what the big deal is...
The point is that the "default" is treated as white. White is treated as "normal." Why call it flesh tone if it does not reflect flesh tone (which cannot be relegated to a single color)?
When I was a child, they did not have flesh tone crayons, as Crayola and other companies had already changed them. If they already changed it then what are you complaining about?! Again, people throw a fit when you illustrate an example for them. The issue was made a racial issue by those who decided to call it flesh tone. Someone points out, "Well, flesh tone isn't accurate, it doesn't match my skin color or most people of my ethnicity, or that person's ethnicity..." Why are you making everything racial! Perhaps not referring to at as flesh tone in the first place would help?
Are you saying that as a black child...you looked at the flesh-tone crayon and suddenly realized that a massive institutional racism existed? You thought that you were less of a person because it wasn't your flesh tone? You wept at the cruelty inherent in humanity that was reflected by the name of a colored crayon?
Or...did it not make any difference in your life whatsoever?
So you have to act like it's the end of the world or nothing is a problem at all? Got it.
This is also ironic...because we don't need everyone to agree on climate change to start on solutions for it. Reducing oil dependency, finding alternative energy sources, increasing the use of public transportation...all these things can happen and do happen regardless of whether or not everyone agrees on climate change. What's more the solutions are obvious...and relatable.
You wanna hear the obvious solution to people with unusual names getting jobs? Stop giving your children unusual names.
Problem solved within just a couple generations.
You do not need everyone to agree, but when there is a political faction that controls about half the government, you're going to need more people that understand the problem rather than calling it a myth. You can't push forward initiatives if there is a group that actively blocks the process.
Jamal, Malik, Imani, Khadijah, these are not unusual names, but they are popular among African Americans. If these names appear on a resume, they are less likely to get a callback for an interview. Why should African Americans not name their children using common names among their ethnic group? That makes absolutely no sense, unless you're demanding that they conform to a white majority. In effect you're saying, if you want to be treated as an equal, then you need to erase your cultural identity. Yep, nothing could be possibly wrong with that attitude.