GOD does not desire nor take pleasure in the death and damnation of anyone...your willingness to contradict the scripture about this is too Calvinistic for me.God's purpose and will. . .same as election of Jacob
...but in your doctrine it was GOD who chose to make me in Adam as a sinner and not like Adam in innocence.You are damned (condemned) by Adam's guilt (Romans 5:18; Ephesians 2:3).
False dichotomy.Can we say the same of the Judge at the County Courthouse who sentences one to death, or life in prison--that he is not loving and righteous?
Is God required to give you his purpose or reason?Chosen for no known reason to be saved or destroyed. RIIIIGHT....no difference at all.
The big difference is that Adam wasn't created sinful, but everyone born is sinful....yet though deemed to be innocent by many, Adam was given a command which must not conflict with
1 Timothy 1:9 We also know that the law is made not for the righteous but for lawbreakers and rebels, the ungodly and sinful, the unholy and irreligious, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, etc, etc.
Didn't apply to Adam....the law is made not for the righteous but for lawbreakers and rebels - time to rethink Adam's status perhaps as supposedly the only innocent person to be given a command.
Nonsense. Read Gen 1:26,27. In v.26 we find 'asah', which means to make out of existing materials. Adam was formed from the dust of the ground.It is well within the meaning of the words to think that Adam and Eve were already sinful when they were sown, (planted, not created) in the garden as per Matt 13:36-39.
I'm not going to get into the details, but there is scientific evidence even now that living bone is an led (light emitting diode). It is entirely possible that Adam and Eve actually glowed. And when they sinned, they lost the glow, which revealed a changed body.The other problem with Adam being innocent in the garden is that when their eyes were opened to their sin, they saw the nakedness they had before they ate, not the sin of their eating. Both the Hebrew word `rm used as a hominem for evil and their eyes being opened to their previously held nakedness (an oft used metaphor for sinfulness) imply that by having this condition before they ate imply strongly they were already sinners when they ate.
OK. Your point?Then there is the small point of Adam being the first to bring sin into the world. In my book the serpent entered the garden with sinful intent to sin and tempted Eve, the first to sin. Then Eve ate, the second to sin and tempted Adam, the third to sin, when he ate.
Where do you get this notion that Adam "was moved from Sheol into his human body"?? Sounds kinda weird.It makes sense to say Adam brought sin into the world if Adam was a sinner when he was moved from Sheol into his human body and as the first person in the garden, was the first to bring evil into world.
This is absurd. Then you are basically saying that God created sin.This is a logical explanation of the words and story that supports my contention Adam and Eve were sinners before they ate the fruit
Not if in the nature of creation, it was the inevitable consequence of Adam's sin, like in the nature of creation, the inevitable consequence of going up is coming down--what goes up must come down....but in your doctrine it was GOD who chose to make me in Adam as a sinner and not like Adam in innocence.
It's not a dichotomy, its a perfect parallel. . .show where it fails.False dichotomy.Clare73 said:Can we say the same of the Judge at the County Courthouse who sentences one to death, or life in prison--that he is not loving and righteous?
Exactly, God did not "set up" Adam's sin, God did not "set up" the baked-in consequences of Adam's sin, andIf the Judge sets it up so the man is a criminal and causes his crimes then yes, the judge is guilty. GOD did not do this...
The Judge of the world is righteous because he is just; i.e., giving everyone his due.I my understanding our Judge is righteous because HE gave us the free will ability to be holy or to sin and we chose sin - HE did not choose us to become sinners for some purpose of HIS own,
Agreed, Adam made us sinners by his rebellion.HE did not choose us to become sinners for some purpose of HIS own, we chose to be sinners because we thought it was a good idea at the time.
Then why do you defend their doctrine?I am most decidedly NOT a Calvinist and abhor the doctrine of unconditional election
That's the point. Election per Eph 1:4 is about believers who are chosen to be holy and blameless.but every verse about election refers to things that can only happen after our redemption and sanctification which is the meaning of the process of salvation...
This refers to freedom from the law, not freedom of the will.I champion the need for our free will or the heavenly marriage based upon love for GOD is a sham.
I also completely deny that sinners have a free will here on earth...it is frankly impossible when we are enslaved by the addictive power of evil.
...at least until their rebirth when it seems like their free will is restored, Galatians 5:13 You, my brothers and sisters, were called to be free. But do not use your freedom to indulge the flesh; rather, serve one another humbly in love.
And you know this, how?Preaamble:
Some people were there when GOD created the physical universe, ie, they were created before the physical universe and sang HIS praises with joy: Job 38:7 ...while the morning stars sang together and all the Sons of GOD shouted for joy? when they witnessed this display of HIS deity and power. The words "sons of GOD" are literal, but interpreted for us as angels to make it easier for us to understand how this verse does not contradict the created on earth theory. <headshake, facepalm>
Don't know what book you got this fantasy from, but you certainly did not get it from the word of God written.Conclusion:
I believe that this group of people contained every person created in HIS image as innocent with a free will and an equal ability and opportunity to put their faith in YHWH OR to reject HIM as a liar and a false god. Those who choose faith in HIM were chosen by HIM, ie elected, and promised salvation for all future sin to become HIS heavenly Bride once all evil was eradicated. Then some elect rebelled against the call for the judgement forcing it to be postponed so they would not be caught up in the destruction for their sin
That refers to the tares in the church, those whose faith is not genuine.Matt 13:28 ‘An enemy did this,’ he replied. So the servants asked him, ‘Do you want us to go and pull them up?’ [bring the judgement upon them?] 29 ‘NO!’ he said, ‘if you pull the weeds now, you might uproot the wheat with them. 30 Let both grow together until the harvest.
Was that the call to judgment refused by the elect?The time of the harvest is the time of the maturity of the seed and the only maturity which saves a sinner from the judgement is the maturity of sanctification.
Thus we live together with those demons who rejected HIM as a liar and a fase god, sinners all, our free will held captive by evil from our foolish rebellion to HIS call to come out from among them and touch not their uncleanness.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?