You're just making up stuff now. God gave Adam only 1 prohibition in the garden.
...yet though deemed to be innocent by many, Adam was given a command which must not conflict with
1 Timothy 1:9 We also know that the law is made not for the righteous but for lawbreakers and rebels, the ungodly and sinful, the unholy and irreligious, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, etc, etc.
...the law is made not for the righteous but for lawbreakers and rebels - time to rethink Adam's status perhaps as supposedly the only innocent person to be given a command.
It s also curious that the word used to describe the serpent's crafty evil is the same word used for Adam and Eve's nakedness.
`RM has two meanings and the meaning is decided by eisegesis, how we figure which one fits the context better. There is also a reference to Noah being naked that clearly means to be unclothed and it is not
`rm that is used.
It is well within the meaning of the words to think that Adam and Eve were already sinful when they were sown, (planted, not created) in the garden as per
Matt 13:36-39.
The other problem with Adam being innocent in the garden is that when their eyes were opened to their sin,
they saw the nakedness they had before they ate, not the sin of their eating. Both the Hebrew word `rm used as a hominem for evil and their eyes being opened to their previously held nakedness (an oft used metaphor for sinfulness) imply that by having this condition before they ate imply strongly they were already sinners when they ate.
Then there is the small point of Adam being the first to bring sin into the world. In my book the serpent entered the garden with sinful intent to sin and tempted Eve, the first to sin. Then Eve ate, the second to sin and tempted Adam, the third to sin, when he ate.
It makes sense to say Adam brought sin into the world if Adam was a sinner when he was moved from Sheol into his human body and as the first person in the garden, was the first to bring evil into world.
This is a logical explanation of the words and story that supports my contention Adam and Eve were sinners before they ate the fruit, sinners before they came to the garden, and they were brought here to have their eyes opened to their sinfulness which they denied, ie, they were not ashamed. That there are other interpretations does not prove mine false but means they must both be studied without ignoring one interpretation for a pre-accepted simple eisegesis...