'Occupy a Desk' Job Fair Rejected By OWS

[MachZer0]

Oh you know well and good that I've been here all along Mach. And for the record, it wasn't me who asked the question in 935. I only mention that because in your quest at deception you may have been preoccupied and missed that.

Interesting that you missed it then. Perhaps a review?

 

[Archaeopteryx]

The only argument I've seen from anyone opposing me is that fair doesn't really mean fair

That's because you've ignored the arguments.

What is your understanding of publicly subsidizing, seeing as how so many of my friends enjoy the semantics games?

How about you just answer the question? Or better yet, you tell us what you think it means and why it's so bad.

You have a fuzzy memory. I clearly said I didn't use speakers, never that they were broken or missing. So that explains a lot

Yes, it does explain a bit. Like why, after repeated attempts, you couldn't hear the heckler call Elizabeth Warren a "socialist [wash my mouth]".

 

[MachZer0]

That's because you've ignored the arguments.



How about you just answer the question? Or better yet, you tell us what you think it means and why it's so bad.

The odd thing is that I very clearly stated my understanding if what publicly subsidized means. Then I asked you how you define it so that we could be sure we were talking about the same thing, and you are the one who has refused to define it. Very odd indeed.

Yes, it does explain a bit. Like why, after repeated attempts, you couldn't hear the heckler call Elizabeth Warren a "socialist [wash my mouth]".

The speaker situation was many years ago

 

[stamperben]

The speaker situation was many years ago

We see you went with cheap ones then...

 

[MachZer0]

We see you went with cheap ones then...

Way off topic

 

[Archaeopteryx]

The odd thing is that I very clearly stated my understanding if what publicly subsidized means. Then I asked you how you define it so that we could be sure we were talking about the same thing, and you are the one who has refused to define it. Very odd indeed.

You're understanding of publicly subsidised is that it "means taking, by force, money from the person who earned it and giving it to the person who didn't earn it." My question was whether that means you're an Anarchist who opposes public subsidies altogether. You haven't answered that yet.

 

[MachZer0]

You're understanding of publicly subsidised is that it "means taking, by force, money from the person who earned it and giving it to the person who didn't earn it." My question was whether that means you're an Anarchist who opposes public subsidies altogether. You haven't answered that yet.

And my question too you was what do you mean by public subsidy, just so we know we're talking about the same thing

 

[RedDead1981]

 

[Archaeopteryx]

And my question too you was what do you mean by public subsidy, just so we know we're talking about the same thing

Since you're a fan of the dictionary, look it up.

 

[stamperben]

Way off topic