Ana the Ist
Aggressively serene!
- Feb 21, 2012
- 39,990
- 12,573
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Married
This is how you ferret out the true pro-totalitarians.
C'mon...why?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
This is how you ferret out the true pro-totalitarians.
How was that not the case in this situation?That was not the situation in this case, and it often isn't. The police were also in plain clothes, for instance, in the Brianna Taylor case.
Causes me to think that the man felt very threatened which makes me think that this apartment house was a high violent crime location which accounts for the no knock and the swat team. Since you are well trained, I doubt that you would have pointed a gun at an armed police officer who had identified himself several times.
One would think that individuals have rights to not have police barge in on them and shoot them simply for existing and owning a gun.
Try to get the facts correct and stop with the inflammatory statements. The man was shot because he pointed a gun at a police officer. Those are the facts stick to them.shoot them simply for existing and owning a gun.
Don't be silly, you can't flush down a person unless you dissolve them in acid, and that takes hours.
America: We're the land of the free, where you can own a gun to defend yourself in your home, and where our second amendment is designed to protect against oppressive government by having a nation of gun owners who can defend themselves.
Also America: Police can smash down the door to your house without announcing who they are, in the middle of the night, and despite the shock and surprise of having people running into your home with guns, if you fail to react exactly as they tell you to, they can just shoot you.
The cognitive gymnastics required to justify both these statements as being true and reasonable are beyond me.
Well, if he chose to live in an "area of violence", he shouldn't complain that he got shot.Does the average person sleep with a gun? NO! They barged in. And yet he had time to wake up and point his gun at them. This is a person that is prepared for violence. Probably an area of violence if the truth be known.
No one uses a battering ram but the police, lolWe have police dressed like police saying they are police and then having a gun pointed at them, what did you expect, Do you think the officer should take the first bullet?
That's been in the news.Is that a saying? Does someone say that?
Police didn't use a battering ram. They used a key. And Locke didn't point a gun at them. If you watch the video, while the gun is visible, he didn't point it at the police. Locke had something like 9 seconds to realize what was going on. thats no time when you are woken up.No one uses a battering ram but the police, lol
This seems like a useless argument. You have to understand that for some people, any kind of movement is enough provocation for deadly force.Police didn't use a battering ram. They used a key. And Locke didn't point a gun at them. If you watch the video, while the gun is visible, he didn't point it at the police. Locke had something like 9 seconds to realize what was going on. thats no time when you are woken up.
One would think that individuals have rights to not have police barge in on them and shoot them simply for existing and owning a gun.
One would think that individuals have rights to not have police barge in on them and shoot them simply for existing and owning a gun.
Try to get the facts correct and stop with the inflammatory statements. The man was shot because he pointed a gun at a police officer. Those are the facts stick to them.
Agreed...it's called the 4th Amendment. Police would definitely need a warrant to "barge in". To even get a warrant in the first place, they would need convincing evidence of such a significant threat of crime and danger that a judge would sign a "no knock" warrant. That could be weeks or months of surveillance, multiple pieces of hard evidence, all kinds of witness statements, etc.
Does anyone....anyone at all....know if the police had a warrant?
Is there any information on whether or not the police had a warrant?
the house that the were legally entering, keep trying, maybe you can find something to critize the police about if you keep working at it.He pointed a gun at them in the house that they were breaking into.
the house that the were legally entering, keep trying, maybe you can find something to critize the police about if you keep working at it.
It is not a legal right to point a gun at a person, when people do that they sometimes end up dead. So just to ease your mind the person was not killed for exercising his legal rights. That misstatement of the facts is simply inflammatory.
Lets not forget to mention that it is also very clear that a gun was pointed at the police by the person who was shot.It's clear that they had a warrant (or at least said so) and also that they came through the door and shot someone seconds later.
We don't know what was in the warrant because the police haven't released it.
Lets not forget to mention that it is also very clear that a gun was pointed at the police by the person who was shot.