You guys were willing to accuse Trump of the Russia Russia Russia hoax without any evidence, so typical of the double standard.
Yes, I know, that is the standard Republican talking point. The issue was, there was plenty of evidence that the Trump campaign was working with the Russians. We have the Trump campaign chair sharing the Trump campaign's internal polling data with Russian operatives, we have a meeting with a "Russian government representative" at Trump Tower, where several high level campaign officials attended -- including Trump's son.
There are good reasons that the investigations in 2017 into Russia were all headed by Republicans; there was no question that there were ties between the Trump campaign and Russia. I'm also not aware of a single news article (actual news, not commentary/editorials) that claimed that Pres. Trump had anything to do with it -- at most it was speculated, since so many high level campaign officials had ties to Russians, that Trump would likely have known.
As it stands, there is no question there were ties between the Trump campaign and Wikileaks. As for Pres. Trump knowing, it is not a "hoax;" it is that we still don't know. What we know is that Trump did his best to hide and obscure what his campaign may have done, and what he personally might have done. I suppose we'll find out, someday, when his former staffers are willing to talk about their roles (likely after former Pres. Trump dies) and his papers about this topic are no longer classified.
Here are a few excerpts from a lengthy Western Journal commentary, with my highlighting:
Explosive Report: Hunter Biden Finally Brought Down - 26-Year FBI Vet Nailed Him - Dynasty in Ruins
DailyMail.com commissioned cyber forensics experts at Maryman & Associates . . .
The firm’s founder, Brad Maryman, was a 29-year veteran of the FBI, served as a Chief Information Security Officer and founded the bureau’s cyber forensics unit. His partner, Dr. Joseph Greenfield, is an associate professor at the University of Southern California and helped write their degree program in intelligence and cyber operations.
. . . A Wilmington, Delaware computer store work order with Hunter’s signature shows he left his 2017 MacBook Pro laptop there on April 12, 2019.
Hunter’s iCloud email address was added to the laptop’s system on October 21 2018, as well as his work email at his firm Rosemont Seneca on February 2 2019.
The same day, a Gmail address he used to log onto sex cam sites, and another personal Gmail address belonging to Hunter, were also added.
Okay, first issue -- there is no mention of a laptop here. Instead, what was allegedly "authenticated" was a hard drive. Next, it has been determined that, while Giuliani was in Ukraine the pictures and emails that were on this hard drive were being circulated around Ukraine and they were being offered for sale.
It appears that Hunter's computer had been hacked and likely his hard drive was cloned. What is unclear is if anything was "added" to the laptop that wasn't from Hunter Biden. For example, if you go back to the Daily Mail article, there are no records of police responding to places where the laptop claims. It also claims that Hunter had Secret Service protection in 2018 -- something he was not entitled to and the Secret Service denied they were protecting Hunter. With Trump in control of the Secret Service at that time, it seems highly unlikely that this account on the laptop is true -- and if it is, it has nothing to do with Joe Biden, as he had not been in government for over a year -- the detail would have needed to be approved by a Republican, someone in the Trump administration.
Emails addressed to Hunter’s various email addresses dating from December 2009 to December 2020 were found on the system.
An iPad with the name ‘Hunter’s iPad’ and three email addresses associated with the Biden family was backed up on the laptop and on iCloud in January 2019 and again a month later.
And this, right here, shows that this is not reliable. If the computer had been left in the shop in April of 2019, why would there be emails all the way up to December 2020? I'm sorry, this alone discredits the claims made. You can argue if the computer had been signed into that the emails would have been updated -- but this is a year and a half after the computer had been dropped off and it would have required Hunter's password to be able to sign in. Hunter's password does not appear to have been given to the owner of the shop and he never claimed to have been given the password, it was not on the work order.
And this is
beyond the inconsistencies in the shop owner's stories -- from how sometimes he claimed three laptops were left and other times only one, to how he never intentionally looked at Hunter's files but somehow just happened to see the "juiciest" emails, photos, and videos.
Which also brings up how Tucker Carlson was pushing this story on his show for a week or so, after the story came out. He even had a UPS conspiracy theory, claiming that they may have "destroyed" evidence when information from the hard drive being sent to him went "missing." Then, the package is found and is being delivered and Tucker promises "a huge story" the next night where he releases all the information they get. But, instead of "a huge story" the next night, Tucker instead suddenly states that he knows Hunter, they were once neighbors and Hunter is a nice guy, that we shouldn't revel in his personal issues and says he's dropping the story. Odd how he finally got the information and suddenly decided it wasn't worth pursuing.
Which brings up the final point -- why do we care about Hunter Biden's personal problems? Hunter is not in the government, he has no government position or influence. The information claimed to have been corroborated only states that Hunter Biden had drug issues and hired prostitutes. The worst it claims is that Joe Biden ran for President to take a spotlight off Hunter. Of course, that doesn't make sense, either. No one would care about Hunter's drug issues or use of prostitutes if his father hadn't been running for President or won the election. At most, now, it seems the story is largely to "embarrass" the President because of the misdeeds of his son.