See post above for detailsThus your continued attempts to invoke Scripture for support continually results in your sophistry being exposed.
So considering the manner of reasoning we have seen thus far, why do you think the poster should see any contradiction with the rule forbidding posters debating issues or teaching against the theology of this Fundamentalist Christian faith group, and him saying such heresies or nonsense as,Nope!
Perhaps you should re-read them!
"Community Rules
All posts within this faith community must adhere to the site wide rules. In addition, if you are not a member of this faith group, you may not debate issues or teach against its theology. You may post in fellowship. Active promotion of views contrary to the established teachings of this group will be considered off topic."
Source
The same rule is in place for the Non-Denom area, btw.
Non-Denom is not a Fundamentalist!
As of right now, you don't have a leg to stand on.
And I'm also sorry, but the scriptures are very clear on just what position God says about this issue.
Sorry.
God Bless
Till all are one.
You may imagine this somehow sanctions homosexual unions and the abrogating of positional/functions distinctions btwn male and female, but your argument is just as bankrupt as before. Since, as patiently explained and ignored, the 1st great commandment comes before the 2nd, and provides the revelation which determines just how you should want yourself treated, and thus how to treat others.I agree it has been ignored for ages. I am sorry for making
your "damnable" claim a difficult one. It may be too liberal
to quote so much scripture.
1. In everything, then,
2. do to others as you would have them do to you.
3. For this is the essence of the Law and the prophets.
4. Enter through the narrow gate.
1. Apply this to everything
2. How to handle all situations with all others
3. Why this is the foundation under every other scripture
4. What will be the results?
Four parts set in a variety of scripture by different authors:
No, my goal is to provide others with the foundation that scripture provides.You may imagine this somehow sanctions homosexual unions and the abrogating of positional/functions distinctions btwn male and females, but it is just as bankrupt as before. Since, as patiently explained and ignored, the 1st great commandment comes before the 2nd, and provides the revelation which determines just how you should want yourself treated, and thus how to treat others.
And which means, among other things, condemning what God condemns, our own sins and those of others, including homosexual relations, while seeking the salvation of sinners.
But why waste time with you when you do not even belong on this forum, and continue to manifest you are not fit for meaningful debate? Are you here to provoke others with your absurd statements and get the page count up?
But why waste time with you when you do not even belong on this forum, and continue to manifest you are not fit for meaningful debate?
Which is just as delusional as before. Love for God means believing what He teaches, which, among other teachings you deny, very clearly teaches positional/functional distinctions btwn male and female, and all your vain isolationist eisegesis cannot change it.No, my goal is to provide others with the foundation that scripture provides.
It remains consistent in all threads.
1. In everything, then,
2. do to others as you would have them do to you.
3. For this is the essence of the Law and the prophets.
4. Enter through the narrow gate.
1. Apply this to everything
2. How to handle all situations with all others
3. Why this is the foundation under every other scripture
4. What will be the results?
This removes all gender bias and discrimination from Christianity.
I do this becasue I love God first.
You can;t get any more fundamental than For this is the essence of the Law and the prophets.
John 1:17 For the law was given by Moses,
but
grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.
I encourage people to ignore my conclusions and hold fast
to the scripture provided.
So considering the manner of reasoning we have seen thus far, why do you think the poster should see any contradiction with the rule forbidding posters debating issues or teaching against the theology of this Fundamentalist Christian faith group, and him saying such heresies or nonsense as,
1. "No committed relationships are a problem. Except for children too young to make good decisions on sex" (in response to the question," "sex between lesbians in a committed relationship get a pass?).
2. "Paul failed to treat people as he himself would wish to be treated" (in response to the question, "was Paul wrong or have I been guilty of misinterpreting those verses pertaining to homosexuality?").
3. "There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. So, God does not see genders. People do see genders and they dream up all kinds of rules.. (in response to the question, So "do you believe lesbianism is condoned? Yes or No?").
4. "Jesus did not get married or have children....He only sanctioned being single."
?
I encourage people to ignore my conclusions and hold fast to the scripture provided.
View attachment 219402
Which is very, very funny considering the scriptures I provided prove you wrong.
God Bless
Till all are one.
It took me decades to see the meaning.
I don't expect any quick change.
Reminder:
"Community Rules
All posts within this faith community must adhere to the site wide rules. In addition, if you are not a member of this faith group, you may not debate issues or teach against its theology. You may post in fellowship. Active promotion of views contrary to the established teachings of this group will be considered off topic."
Statement of Purpose for the Fundamentalist Area
Non-Denom is not Fundamentalist.
God Bless
Till all are one.
There is one "golden rule" that is being forgotten here.
If what Paul wrote nearly 2000 years meant what it did then, it still means the same thing today. As I have shown.
"Thus a Fundamentalist can be from quite a few Protestant denominations,
even nondenominational. " - Statement of Purpose for the Fundamentalist Area
I hvae no poerblm wtih ppoele not being
albe to see puacitalrr wettrin mesegsas
in suctrpire. Peploe ee waht tehy wsih to
see. Me incueldd.
A Fundamentalist Christian is a born again believer in Lord Jesus Christ who:
- Statement of Purpose for the Fundamentalist Area
- Maintains an immovable allegiance to the inerrant, infallible, and verbally Inspired Bible;
- Believes whatever the Bible says is so;
- Judges all things by the Bible, and is judged only by the Bible, aka - "Sola Scriptura";
- Affirms the foundational truths of the historic Christian Faith:
a. The doctrine of the Trinity
b. The incarnation, virgin birth, substitutionary atonement, bodily resurrection, ascension into Heaven, and Second Coming of the Lord Jesus Christ
c. The new birth through regeneration of the Holy Spirit
d. The resurrection of saints to life eternal
e. The resurrection of the ungodly to final judgment and eternal death
f. The fellowship of the saints, who are the body of Christ;- Practices fidelity to that faith, and endeavors to preach it to every creature;
- Exposes and separates from all ecclesiastical denial of that Faith, compromise with error, and apostasy from the Truth; and
- Earnestly contends for the Faith once delivered.
- Therefore, Fundamentalism is a militant orthodoxy with a soulwinning zeal. While Fundamentalists may differ on certain interpretations of Scripture, we join in unity of heart and common purpose for the defense of the Faith and the preaching of the Gospel, without compromise or division.
Lets compare.
A few things to know about non-denominational Christians:
-Non-Denomionational Statement of Purpose
- A non-denominational Christian church is one that is autonomous and not under a central authority (i.e. governing board, Magesterium, Patriarchs) on matters of doctrine, ordination, policy or discipline. They may, however, be part of an association to share resources.
- We believe that Bible is the word of God, inspired by the Holy Spirit, and the only authoritative and infallible rule of Christian faith and practice.
- We believe in the Triune nature of God (Trinitarianism) and therefore the topic of non-Trinitarianism may not be discussed in this forum. Please discuss this topic in the Controversial Theology forum.
- We believe the only true basis of Christian fellowship is Christ's (agape) love, which is greater than differences one may possess, and without which we have no right to claim ourselves Christians.
- Salvation is by God's grace through faith in Jesus Christ who died for our sins and rose again, providing eternal redemption to those who believe. It is not by our works or works of the law. (Eph 2: 8-9)
- Since salvation is by grace, promotion of the doctrine of salvation by works and Saturday (seventh-day) worship is not allowed. Please discuss these topics in Sabbath and The Law forum.
I see quite a few differences.
Most especially here:
"compromise with error"
And here:
"and the only authoritative and infallible rule of Christian faith and practice."
It is very clear what the scriptures, and God's position is on this topic. And clearly, one of us, does not follow this.
And it isn't me!
God Bless
Till all are one.
Paul was the "chief of all sinners" and said he was "the worst."
His advice was/is subject to examination by all Bereans of faith.
10 As soon as night had fallen, the brothers sent Paul and Silas away to Berea. On arriving there, they went into the Jewish synagogue.
11 Now the Bereans were more noble-minded than the Thessalonians,for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if these teachings were true.
So you are under the illusion that anyone who has a different
view from yours is excluded. I am familiar with that goal.
No, I have provided scripture to back my point of which, you clearly say is irrelevant.
Yet here in this area, scripture is #1 priority.
Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.(1 Timothy 2)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?