- Mar 4, 2005
- 30,958
- 9,946
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Neither you, nor anyone else, have explained why they are different.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Neither you, nor anyone else, have explained why they are different.If you conclude that therefore, they are preaching the same gospel, that is as equally illogical as in my analogy
Neither you, nor anyone else, have explained why they are different.
And I've told you, I don't want a chart that someone else has produced which, they say, shows the "2 Gospels" and the differences between them.I have already given you a picture that illustrates so many differences, with various scripture
And I've told you, I don't want a chart that someone else has produced which, they say, shows the "2 Gospels" and the differences between them.
I want to know why people in this thread - and preferably the OP, but I think he's had enough - claim that the 4 Gospel writers and Paul are saying different things. I've given you some specific examples of things which Jesus preached, which Paul also preached. How does that fit your insistence that there were 2 Gospels?
Matthew and John - disciples - wrote their Gospels and Peter was the main source for Mark's Gospels. 3 of the Gospels were written by Apostles; the Apostles welcomed Paul after his conversion and accepted him as an Apostle also. Why would they have done that if he were preaching something different?
They may have been called to different people; that doesn't mean they preached different Gospels.
London is the capital of England, and that fact doesn't change whether I am speaking to the Scots, the French, Americans or Africans.
Similarly, Jesus, son of Mary and also Son of God, lived, taught, died on the cross, was raised again, ascended, sent his Spirit and will one day return.
ONE Jesus - human and divine; not 2. ONE way to receive eternal life - through Jesus - not 2.
If YOU are claiming that they are different, YOU should be able to explain it, and answer my questions, in your own words.The chart shows so many differences between the 2 gospels.
If you don't want to consider them, that is your prerogative, but that is different from "no one have explain the differences".
If YOU are claiming that they are different, YOU should be able to explain it, and answer my questions, in your own words.
I have listed a number of things that both Jesus and Paul preached on and asked you to comment. Your only answer is "look at this chart."
It suggests to me that you can't respond to/have no answer for what I have asked.
That post is not about the meaning of inherit
That's a bit like you asking me a science question and I reply "see what Einstein taught".You are strange, I gave the differences in that chart, together with so many scripture passages, and you still ask me to explain the differences.
The problem there is that there's only one Gospel. The whole "two gospels" thing is nonsense.The chart shows so many differences between the 2 gospels.
If I may my 2 cents. I don't think it was allegory and also don't think the sun and moon actually stood still but they appeared to, to Joshua. How could that happen without upsetting the entire solar system? IMHO God simply refracted the light making it to appear to stand still to Joshua and all those around him. But that's only my opinion.Your post shows that you do not understand what spiritualizing means. You accuse me of spiritualizing accounts in The Bible. But spiritualizing events in The Bible, is when a person states, events in The Bible do not actually happen literately, but only happen spiritually in the believer.
In your post that you say i am spiritualizing sheep and goats, etc.. but not one time did i say this or other events in The Bible do not happen literally.
An example of spiritualizing accounts in The Bible is Amillennialism.
...Do you believe Joshua 10:12-15 actually happened as it is stated in The Bible? That Joshua commanded the sun and moon to stop moving over the earth. ...If you do not, then you are allegorizing this event in The Bible.
If I may my 2 cents. I don't think it was allegory and also don't think the sun and moon actually stood still but they appeared to, to Joshua. How could that happen without upsetting the entire solar system? IMHO God simply refracted the light making it to appear to stand still to Joshua and all those around him. But that's only my opinion.
I do believe in the creation just they way it is written I believe it differently than you do.That is where believing in sciences creation forces you to see Joshua 10 the way you do.
But if you were to believe in the creation God created that is described in The Bible. Joshua 10:12-15 can be believed as is written in The Bible.
The problem there is that there's only one Gospel. The whole "two gospels" thing is nonsense.
Your post shows that you do not understand what spiritualizing means. You accuse me of spiritualizing accounts in The Bible. But spiritualizing events in The Bible, is when a person states, events in The Bible do not actually happen literately, but only happen spiritually in the believer.
In your post that you say i am spiritualizing sheep and goats, etc.. but not one time did i say this or other events in The Bible do not happen literally.
An example of spiritualizing accounts in The Bible is Amillennialism.
...Do you believe Joshua 10:12-15 actually happened as it is stated in The Bible? That Joshua commanded the sun and moon to stop moving over the earth. ...If you do not, then you are allegorizing this event in The Bible.
Ok then , if that's too hard for you, another question: did Paul lie when he said there is only one Gospel and that anyone who says differently should be cursed?
No.After the agreement made with James Cephas and John in Galatians 2:7-9, Paul was writing to gentiles in the Body of Christ in chapters 1 and 2
Let's really read the words carefully to understand what Paul is really saying, notice the unto 3 three times?
Galatians 1:8-9
8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
9 As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.
Paul is actually saying if the gentiles are preached another gospel other than the one what they are receiving from Paul, let the preacher be accused.
Can you see you are misinterpreting it to mean "Paul also said if anyone preach any other Gospel, let him be accursed"?
THE Good News is that though mankind had sinned, disobeyed God, separated themselves from him, were spiritually dead and deserved to remain that way, GOD in his mercy, made it possible for us to be reconciled to him, receive eternal life and have a relationship with him.God has only ONE good news throughout OT and NT?
Is that what you are saying?
No.
There is no other Gospel, and if anyone tried to preach one - whether they were preaching to Gentiles, Jews and Gentiles or to next door's cat - they should be cursed.
Paul said in 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 that he preached that Christ died for our sins, that he was buried and that he was raised again; all this was foretold in OT Scriptures.
Jesus and the disciples also preached this - Matthew 26:28, Mark 8:31, Mark 10:45, Luke 18:31-33, Luke 23:50-56, Luke 24, John 10:11, John 20.
One Gospel.
Well technically the sun is stationary relative to the earth and all the planets as they revolve around the sun.also don't think the sun and moon actually stood still but they appeared to, to Joshua. How could that happen without upsetting the entire solar system? IMHO God simply refracted the light making it to appear to stand still to Joshua and all those around him. But that's only my opinion.
OK, every sentence spoken by or Lord, or St. Paul, or any of the other saint, is a different "gospel" because they didn't all say the same precise thing.God has only ONE good news throughout OT and NT?
Is that what you are saying?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?