juvenissun
... and God saw that it was good.
- Apr 5, 2007
- 25,452
- 805
- 72
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
Is that an implication to what happened to human after the Noah's Flood?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Different how? How would different genetic behavior then produce the results we see now.
There are lots of ways to change DNA to shorten lifespans. Other than eliminating all the mildly deleterious variants, no known way of lengthening them.
Hello SZ.
The foundation of science itself is a belief in the validity of the observable evidence. If the observable evidence does not in the end, reveal the initial causation of these observable events. Then the foundation of this scientific endeavor is in effect also a mythical enterprise.
We have two sides in this debate, both sides have some evidence, but both sides lack the hard observational evidence that is necessary. One has faith and the other has hypothesis, which are very similar expressions.
Would I teach children creationism?
Would I teach children scientific hypothesis?
How about presenting both sides and allowing everyone the right to choose for themselves which is correct? Or, is indoctrination the preferred system as long as it is the one that you agree with?
No. I'm talking about real changes to human genetics. Noah's Flood is a story about something that didn't happen.Is that an implication to what happened to human after the Noah's Flood?
Where is the "scientific evidence" of how space, matter, energy, time and natural laws came into existence? Can you provide empirical evidence for that or is it just a "myth" like, they just were?There is no scientific evidence for your beliefs
What does this have to do with evolution or genetic bottlenecks?Where is the "scientific evidence" of how space, matter, energy, time and natural laws came into existence?
We went over this and that belongs in another thread.Where is the "scientific evidence" of how space, matter, energy, time and natural laws came into existence? Can you provide empirical evidence for that or is it just a "myth" like, they just were?
....Both sides?? Both sides of what? Science only has one evidenced theory in regards to the variety of life. What other theory are you speaking of, and when did it come about?How about presenting both sides and allowing everyone the right to choose for themselves which is correct? Or, is indoctrination the preferred system as long as it is the one that you agree with?
There's a gross misunderstanding here - Science has to account for all of the available evidence. That's to say, if there's evidence that goes against the theory, it has to be accounted for one way or another, or the theory has to be discarded. Evidence will never prove a theory right, it can only ever prove a theory wrong. This is how we know Creationism is Wrong.Hello SZ.
The foundation of science itself is a belief in the validity of the observable evidence. If the observable evidence does not in the end, reveal the initial causation of these observable events. Then the foundation of this scientific endeavor is in effect also a mythical enterprise.
We have two sides in this debate, both sides have some evidence, but both sides lack the hard observational evidence that is necessary. One has faith and the other has hypothesis, which are very similar expressions.
Would I teach children creationism?
Would I teach children scientific hypothesis?
Should we present flat earth in geography class? Anti-vax in health class? Holocaust and moon landing denial in history class?How about presenting both sides and allowing everyone the right to choose for themselves which is correct? Or, is indoctrination the preferred system as long as it is the one that you agree with?
Correct, I applied the wrong term. One would expect a Founder's Effect with the Gen. 1 myth. Though the results are identical to a population bottleneck.I voted no because we would find a bottleneck event in Gen. 6-9, not in Gen. 1.
No. I'm talking about real changes to human genetics. Noah's Flood is a story about something that didn't happen.
Kinda like saying, "Filler up with Hydrogen!" in March 1936, when they should have said "Helium"?Correct, I applied the wrong term.
Nope, not even close. But thanks for admitting that you are wrong.Kinda like saying, "Filler up with Hydrogen!" in March 1936, when they should have said "Helium"?
Albeit the results weren't identical:
There are many things that can go wrong with human bodies. The more of them you have, the shorter you'll live. There is no reason at all to think the overall level of bad stuff in our DNA has increased over time.I was talking about real changes too. Noah's Flood is simply a name that represents the ultimate cause of all the changes. Human DNA has been changes sequentially (due to some processes) so that the longevity continue to decrease until the change was stabilized at Abraham's time.
Could that be true? Since you said that there are many ways it could happen.
Hydrogen and Helium are synonyms to you!?Nope, not even close.
Nope, but as I said, thank you for admitting that you are wrong.Hydrogen and Helium are synonyms to you!?
I think a glib, obsession with the death and suffering of others is a poor reflection on a Christ centered life, don't you.Nope, not even close. But thanks for admitting that you are wrong.
Not everyone dies.I think a glib, obsession with the death and suffering of others is a poor reflection on a Christ centered life, don't you.
I think a glib, obsession with the death and suffering of others is a poor reflection on a Christ centered life, don't you.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?