You are wrong again. The Latin name “Lucifer” didn’t appear until the 4th century in Jeromes Vulgate translation.
How do you know?
No one on earth was named Lucifer until the 4th century?
Not even a dog, or a bird, or anything?
And Jerome just happened to stumble upon a writing that had the first-ever name of Lucifer in it?
I don't think so, chief.
Colter said:
The fact that Cain feared people out away from his parents was left in the record:
That's right.
What's your point?
Adam & Eve had Cain and Abel and a host of others.
Genesis 5:4 And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters:
And all this host of others had hosts of others who had hosts of others.
So by the time Cain kills Abel, there's a host of others x a host of others on the earth.
It's basic math.
Notice that, just before the killing, we read this:
Genesis 4:3 And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the LORD.
Are you telling me that, in that process of time, Adam & Eve, who were blessed with fertility and told to replenish the earth, had no children?
I mean ... seriously?
If you were told to fill a sack up with potatoes, and you put two potatoes in the sack and then stopped, what would your employer think?
You think like a scientist, don't you?
Can't do math, move the decimal point as needed, move time back by four years to make it look like Jesus was born before His time, etc. and so on.
Yup ... I smell a Ph.D. here.