PsychoSarah
Chaotic Neutral
Does anyone else find it strange just how much AV doesn't want it to be alcoholic?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No argument there.But fermented grape juice is usually called wine.
Correct.But isnt your view that english is the language of god/angels and that the KJV is inerrant?
QV please:And those who penned the KJV certainly held grape juice and wine as two seperate entities.
Non-alcoholic grape juice was not available until 1869 when it was invented by Dr. Thomas Welch. (It's called Welch's Grape Juice for a reason.) Welch was a teetotaller who objected to taking communion with wine and who wanted a non-alcoholic alternative. So after experimentation he succeeded in developing what he called "unfermented wine." Even then it was called wine, not grape juice, that name coming into use when his son took over marketing in 1875.
Does anyone else find it strange just how much AV doesn't want it to be alcoholic?
...
The source you point to says that the Bible does indeed mean wine and not grape juice.
Yup -- that's because he says grape juice already has a modicum of alcohol in it.
That's what he says.So Jesus did miraculously create alcoholic wine...
If there really was a historical Jesus Christ, then the wine he drank contained alcohol.
Nothing in there says that drinking is a sin. It could conceivably be interpreted as stating that being drunk is a sin but that isn't the same thing.Proverbs 20:1 Wine is a mocker, strong drink is raging: and whosoever is deceived thereby is not wise.
Is smoking a sin?Nothing in there says that drinking is a sin.
No, it isn't. Where did you get the idea it was?Smoking is not a sin either, is it?
There is something less than none?And it has less Biblical support than drinking.
![]()
Nothing in there says that drinking is a sin. It could conceivably be interpreted as stating that being drunk is a sin but that isn't the same thing.
Not according to the Biblical record.Well, for the record, drinking is a sin
The cognitive dissonance it takes to come up with this statement is astounding.and Jesus wouldn't be an enabler.
Second, they had already drank the alcoholic wine up (assuming alcoholic wine was there in the first place), so Jesus wouldn't be giving them more.
It doesn't matter.Shared among how many people?
Not according to the Biblical record.
Not according to the King James version of the Bible.Drinking is a sin.
Not according to the King James version of the Bible.Jesus turned water into grape juice.