Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Seeing as how that order of events is contradicted by Genesis 2, I don't see why not.Can you get away with the order of events in Genesis 1?
You mean the fact that the word used for the wine the guests drank first, oinos, is exactly the same word that is used for the wine that Jesus created later?Can I get away with the order of events in John 2?
Why would there be?That's because there is no reference in the Bible to non-alcoholic wine.
I'm not the only one that claims it though.BTW, just because you claim some wine in the Bible is non-alcoholic does not make it so.
And is therefore no longer milk, but cheese.Milk was preserved by converting it to cheese.
Not according to the King James version of the Bible.Because drinking is a sin.
It would be just as miraculous for Jesus to turn water into grape juice, so why would that be a problem?Yes -- the story has another connotation:
John 2:11 This beginning of miracles did Jesus in Cana of Galilee, and manifested forth his glory; and his disciples believed on him.
If "oinos" means alcoholic wine ... and only alcoholic wine ... then the document it was written on is garbage.You mean the fact that the word used for the wine the guests drank first, oinos, is exactly the same word that is used for the wine that Jesus created later?
Others may have decided that, but God did not.
Yes, that's exactly what it means."Don't get drunk" means "drink moderately"?
Yes, you are. Just like all the rest of us.I guess I'm a sinner then, aren't I?
Why should I? They acknowledge thatThen use this one I posted: WINE IN THE BIBLE: A BIBLICAL STUDY ON THE USE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES.
Why would there be?
SMDHUntil fermentation was invented, the default position would have been non-alcoholic.
In other words, alcoholic wine would be the exception, rather than the rule.
No, if they drank grape juice, they would have to drink it as quickly as possible before it went bad.I'm sure they didn't pick grapes, crush them, then let the juice spoil.
You claim a lot of things that have no basis in reality. That's one of them.I'm not the only one that claims it though.
Remember what I've said many times here: "Google is your enemy"?
Why?If "oinos" means alcoholic wine ... and only alcoholic wine ... then the document it was written on is garbage.
Holy cow! Did you just acknowledge that the King James version of the Bible isn't the original version of the Bible?Find the document that God superintended, and I'll bet it was a different word.
And I'm asking "why is it that the word used for the wine the guests drank first, oinos, is exactly the same word that is used for the wine that Jesus created later?"Again though, I'm saying "If oinos means alcoholic wine" -- and that's a big "if".
I've only been doing that for nine years.Did you just acknowledge that the King James version of the Bible isn't the original version of the Bible?
Because the Satanically-inspired Wrong's Concordance says it was?And I'm asking "why is it that the word used for the wine the guests drank first, oinos, is exactly the same word that is used for the wine that Jesus created later?"
Then why do so many run to Strong's Concordance for guidance?No, I can simply read His Word.
So bring back Prohibition then.
Then why do so many run to Strong's Concordance for guidance?
Why is it one needs two books to understand what God said?
Well they say you can't legislate morality, but if God can put the Ten Commandments on His books, then we can surely put Prohibition on ours.Because it worked so well the first time...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?