Multiple Universes

[JohnEmmett]

The Multiverse Hypothesis Explained by Max Tegmark


youtu.be/e6ENVYBaiWQ?t=270

 

[JohnEmmett]

youtu.be/fPHnWwyvSsg?t=758

My thoughts on CERN and the Mandela Effect!


“They don’t know how deep the rabbit hole goes …”

 

[JohnEmmett]

Evidence of the Mandela effect…

Halley's Comet

(It was Haley’s comet)

 

[Bungle_Bear]

Evidence of the Mandela effect…

Halley's Comet

(It was Haley’s comet)

Lol. Somebody mispronounced a name for years, therefore the spelling must have changed. I well remember pronouncing it "Haley" until somebody pointed out that was a mistake. The spelling never changed, only my pronunciation.

 

[JohnEmmett]

I well remember pronouncing it "Haley" until somebody pointed out that was a mistake.

No mistake

That’s the crazy thing

 

[David's Harp]

Psychics are just intuitive

Remote viewing is real

You say that with some certainty. I believe that the phenomena exists and has been or is being used today for different purposes.

But is there any scientific proof for the mechanism by which this is employed - other than the results obtained?
Or is this mechanism taken on faith, simply because it does yield results?
I would think that whatever idea is presented will be based on a theoretical model that will require an element of faith to believe in. Not so different from having faith in a sole creator, or a source from which everything flows, if you prefer. Else, what sustains the universe(s).

 

[JohnEmmett]

But is there any scientific proof for the mechanism by which this is employed - other than the results obtained?

They typically try to verify the results


Then they have awareness of accuracy

 

[David's Harp]

They typically try to verify the results


Then they have awareness of accuracy

I was really driving at the 'magic' that makes it happen, rather than the results. How is this verified?

 

[JohnEmmett]

I was really driving at the 'magic' that makes it happen, rather than the results. How is this verified?

They start by not knowing the Target

So they describe the Target

There is only one Target to describe accurately

 

[David's Harp]

They start by not knowing the Target

So they describe the Target

There is only one Target to describe accurately

I mean, is the process able to be verified scientifically, do you know?

 

[JohnEmmett]

I mean, is the process able to be verified scientifically, do you know?

Seems not necessary…

Don’t know

 

[Bungle_Bear]

No mistake

No, it was a mistake. That's the part you don't seem to be able to understand.

 

[JohnEmmett]

No, it was a mistake.

“For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong.”

H. L. Mencken

 

[Bungle_Bear]

“For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong.”

H. L. Mencken

For every simple problem there is an answer that is clear, simple and correct.

Instead of meaningless soundbites, please try to understand. Reality is so much more approachable when you accept that we have fallible memories.

 

[JohnEmmett]

please try to understand.

ditto

 

[Bungle_Bear]

ditto

Quoting out of context is not cool.

By all means keep fighting reality, if that's how you want to waste your energy. But you could probably find far more productive outputs for your energy if you just accepted that we are not perfect.

 

[JohnEmmett]

By all means keep fighting reality…

“The person who distrusts himself has no touchstone for reality—for this touchstone can be only oneself.”
- James Baldwin

 

[Yaaten]

It's all very well to postulate the existence of other, alternative realities to the one we're all actually in, but unless you have something really strong and concrete to justify your belief in such, then there's not much point in even discussing it.
I believe that this reality is the only one that actually exists. Now, I can't prove this, but why should I believe otherwise? Remember with whom the burden of evidence lies; with the claimant.

 

[JohnEmmett]

Remember with whom the burden of evidence lies; with the claimant.

I’ve seen the world map change …

Japan, Australia, New Zealand, France, India, Egypt, etc.

I speculate this is because I’m sliding into parallel, similar timelines.

 

[Yaaten]

I’ve seen the world map change …

Japan, Australia, New Zealand, France, India, Egypt, etc.

I speculate this is because I’m sliding into parallel, similar timelines.

Okay, but why should I believe you? Did you bring anything with you from these parallel realities? You know, like an atlas perhaps?