Hi LastSeven;
Wow. I can't believe I finally found somebody who agrees with me on this. The second resurrection and the great distress go hand in hand, after the millennium.
Let's go thru it biblically and eliminate all doubt.
Daniel 12
........ There will be a time of distress such as has not happened from the beginning of nations until then. But at that time your peopleeveryone whose name is found written in the bookwill be delivered.
2 Multitudes who sleep in the dust of the earth will awake: some to everlasting life, others to shame and everlasting contempt.
The only timeframe given is the time of the distress that only happens once in all creation. AT THAT TIME multitudes awake. Some to life others to contempt or they are raised to be condemned as it says in other references. Both righteous and wicked are involved at this time.
The kicker here is that Daniel can not qualify to be raised in the first resurrection anyway because Daniel does not have any qualifications as is listed in Rev 20:4 and 6.
And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony for Jesus and because of the word of God. They had not worshiped the beast or his image and had not received his mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
The candidates for that first resurrection have been killed, John saw their souls in Heaven, and more specifically they were killed because of their testimony of Jesus. Daniel never heard the name Jesus, Daniel wasn't killed for that testimony because Daniel never said anything about what angels told him. Daniel 12:9. ( There is another verse which tells us that Daniel doesn't reveal things, but it has left me????) Daniel had no connection of any kind with the tribulation beast, the mark or anything close to it. The next thing is that Daniel 12:13 verifies that Daniel is resurrected at the end of the days.
13 "As for you, go your way till the end. You will rest, and then at the end of the days you will rise to receive your allotted inheritance."
So Daniel, who would NOT be considered in the wicked is raised at the end of the days, the time of distress or the great tribulation. So there are righteous as well as wicked in that resurrection of the dead at the time of the great trib/parousia.
6Blessed and holy are those who have part in the first resurrection. The second death has no power over them, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with him for a thousand years.
That verse makes it clear that there are NO wicked in the FIRST resurection, it involves only the blessed and the holy.
The final thing to consider is that the FIRST resurrection is the beginning of the 1000 year reign with Christ. Verse 5 specifically says that 1000 years must end before that next resurrection of the dead can occur.
This eliminates a lot of doctrine which is out there today. First, any teaching about the 1000 year reign being on earth can't happen. Second, any teaching of a physical bodied resurrection is in doubt. Why would the first resurrection be to heaven and Daniel and the wicked get some other deal? What biblical passages would allow for that?
Another point to ponder concerning this is that the end of days, the harvest of the earth, the wrath of God is not the end of the world. It is not the end of death on earth for either the wicked or the righteous. We know this because John watches the wrath of God take place and the last instruction he was given before that wrath was:
13Then I heard a voice from heaven say, "Write: Blessed are the dead who die in the Lord from now on."
There are people who believe in Jesus who die AFTER the wrath of God, the great trib, is over.
Please comment and add or take away whatever seems in error, thanks.
Justme