Okay... Do you have any idea of what you're talking about? Are you trying to make a coherent argument or are you just running around saying "nuh uh"? Because this thread is about the birther conspiracy and most my comments have mostly been related to that. How is pointing out conservatives' double standards towards foreign-born candidates not substantive to a discussion about the birther conspiracy?
Yes, when fact checker articles provide actual facts and actual quotes (which is what I cited them for, not for their opinions), they are reliable sources. When wikipedia articles are sourced and the article matches the source, then yes, wikipedia information is also reliable. Besides, the only thing I used wikipedia for was to show that you were wrong about Cruz' father being an American citizen.
Here's an interview with Ted's dad saying that he became a Canadian citizen while working in Canada:
How Ted Cruz's Father Shaped His Views On Immigration
Is that substantive and factual enough for you? Would that hold up in court?