Understood.
You are among those of Christianity who believe that Paul was a fraud, a hypocrite and a chameleon.
Question: How can someone be a BONDSERVANT of Messiah if they are worried and concerned about what men think of them?
For am I now seeking the favor of men, or of God? Or am I striving to please men? If I were still trying to please men, I would not be a bond-servant of Christ. Galatians 1:10
Its kind of ironic that you believe Paul was guilty of the very same thing he rebuked Peter of.
In Galatians 2 Peter was being a hypocrite along with some other believing Jews, separating themselves from the Gentiles when the circumcision party was around, and associating themselves with the Gentiles when they werent.
Paul took Peter aside and rebuked him for behaving like a sinner! Peter was not being straightforward about the gospel. He was being wishy-washy! The exact same thing youre accusing Paul of.
In 1 Corinthians 11:1 Paul tells us to Be imitators of me, just as I also am of Christ. Do you believe Paul could truly be a bondservant of Messiah, if he didnt walk in the same manner that Messiah walked?
Im sorry but this is a bogus statement, no offense. Pauls own testimony?
Pauls own testimony was Acts 24:14; I confess that I believe EVERYTHING that agrees with the Law of God.
Pauls own testimony was Acts 20:21; I walk orderly and keep the Law of God
Pauls own testimony was Acts 25:8; I have committed no offense against the Law of the Temple.
Pauls own testimony was Romans 3:31: Do we nullify the Law by our salvation? God forbid, we ESTABLISH the Law.
Pauls own testimony was Romans 7:22: I joyfully concur with the Law of God
Pauls own testimony was Romans 7:12, 14, 25: I serve the spiritual, righteous and good Law of God.
Just five CLEAR confessions from Paul himself, that completely disagree with your statement.
Paul NEVER claimed to be free from the obedience of Gods Instructions. (If you want to talk about your interpretations of phrases such as under the law and works of the law we can Scripturally discuss those)
what a hypocrite.
Oh and under the law does NOT mean obedient to the Law of God. Those who are saved are NOT under the law. Think about that for a second.
To get into the physical/spiritual aspects of the Law would be way to lengthy and frankly off topic
There is a context behind most of Pauls writing.
Not sure if you knew this from your studies, but Paul was dealing with a Gentile crowd that was forced or coerced into misusing the Law and its commandments. He was constantly having to teach them the deeper meaning of the commandments, because many were outwardly circumcising without even understanding the commandment of circumcision, let alone the spiritual meanings behind each commandment.
according to your interpretation of that passage.
If I remember correctly, the Spirit leads us in ALL Truth.
Psalm 119:142 and 151 tells us that Gods Law and His Commandments ARE TRUTH.
Do you mean to tell me that once you are saved, the Spirit leads you in a truth OTHER than His Instructions?
We might be led by different spirits, if thats the case.
Question:
If I open up an Trigonometry book and try teaching 9th grade trig
Then Im followed by the greatest mathematician who has ever lived teaches the same 9th grade trig
Will or will not the entire class be blown away by the depth, breadth and substance that the mathematician will bring to the class, as opposed to my methods and teaching?
Same thing with Messiah. He IS the PERFECT TORAH TEACHER. He didnt preach from a different Torah in the sermon on the mount. He CORRECTLY taught the Torah of His Father!
Do you honestly believe that God didnt have lusting in mind when He gave the adultery and coveting and envying commandments? Are you kidding me?
Messiah simply brought out the COMPLETE meaning to the Torah of God. This is what true fulfilling the Law means. Its correctly interpreting and teaching the Torah!
Oh brother, are you seriously bringing up a mans tradition?
Both Mark 7 and Matthew 15 make it crystal clear that this was mans tradition!
Nowhere in the Torah does God command this command.
Next.
WOW! Talk about twisting Scripture.
Nowhere in Matthew 5:20 does God mention a righteousness that exceeds the righteousness of the law.
Its kinda scary the means that you are using to come to your teaching. Deuteronomy 13:1-6 keeps coming up in my mind with each word you say on here.
Netzarim already addressed this mistake you made so I wont repeat it.
Stop adding to Gods Word to try and prove your point. Its kind of blasphemous. (Deut 4:2)
Read Mark 7:8 and the entire chapter of Matthew 23 while youre at it. You are in for a shocking!
Im simply skimming now
because as this post goes on
Its error upon error.
This new covenant you speak of, will have the SAME LAW of God written on the hearts and minds of the partakers. GO figure.
Read Ezekiel 36:25-28
and tell me what the Spirit of God will cause us to walk in