SilverBear
Well-Known Member
but all this is true. the Constitution institutionalized slavery and it actually says black people are not fully human or worth the same as a human being.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
but all this is true. the Constitution institutionalized slavery and it actually says black people are not fully human or worth the same as a human being.The constitution is being attacked as racist and outdated.
https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1259&context=penn_law_review_online
Amending a Racist Constitution
https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...e-constitution-was-indeed-pro-slavery/406288/
Harmful Language in the U.S. Constitution? | The Federalist Society
Actually that was the 1964 Civil Rights Act that gave the protection…it took a few years to find that these protections shielded a person from loving the “wrong” people.Discrimination because of sexual Orientation is prohibited. The Supreme Court gave them equal protection
not absurd at all. we have two instances of people using a swastika to express themselves and their view.Absurd comparison.
But then I'm not surprised when it come from the words are violence crowd. To you guys posting a meme protesting the authoritarian ideology is exactly the same things as carving a swastika in someone's head. That's why you can justify throwing someone in prison for a meme. That's how authoritarianism works.
And you just proved it.
and all you've done is come rushing to the defense of racists. Good job.You're the one that asked and we proved out point. You asked who got cancelled and we told who and now you want to defend cancellation. Why bother asking?
You are for cancellation of people who do t agree. Authoritarianism of the LGBTQ ideology on full display.
Folks we are facing some serious issues today in regards to the LGBTQ agenda to force acceptance and completely shut down freedom of speech that opposes them in any way. Including sharing opinions or failing to accept the ideology. Remember speech is violence. And they are actively pursuing government intervention to shut you up including arrest if necessary and sendi g you to re-education.
In the UK a veteran was arrested for causing anxiety in a person due to a social media post. Including in this was a way to avoid a fine by going to re-education to teach you proper thinking.
The man re-posted a post where a person created a meme of a swastika made from gay pride flags. The meme was created as a protest against the the way gay pride month has been enforced with hectoring authoritarianism.
Someone saw the meme and reported the incident to police.
Veteran is arrested 'for causing anxiety' for retweeting meme of swastika made out of Pride flags | Daily Mail Online
We are headed this direction here in the US. Title 9 is now looking at rules expanding on the "harassing" rules. To such an extent of using government to shut down and eliminate your free speech.
Some of this has been put in hold through the courts but it's not decided yet.
Hold onto your hats. If you don't cowtow to the LGBTQ ideology the efforts to shut you up and punish you are in full swing.
Veteran is arrested 'for causing anxiety' for retweeting meme of swastika made out of Pride flags | Daily Mail Online
and how did dropping that swastika into a discussion about anti-trans hate crimes illustrate the "authoritarian lgbt movement"?The swastika is the ultimate symbol of authoritarianism. Although I'd argue that the hammer and sickle is just as bad if not worse, but that's beside the point.
People who use it as a symbol for their ideology are nothing more than authoritarians.
People also use it to claim that others are authoritarians.
It's no different than calling someone a Nazi. It's used in many different ways. In this case the author told us the meaning.
apparently its noble and praiseworthy to persecute SOME minoritiesConsidering the persecution of homosexuals by Nazis, equating LGBTQ to Nazis is inappropriate and offensive, even if the intent is just to claim that the LGBTQ movement is authoritarian (somehow).
Persecution of homosexuals in Nazi Germany - Wikipedia
In fact, since the Nazis were prone to exterminating people they didn't like, using the symbol without providing an explanation could easily be misinterpreted as a terrorist-style warning against LGBTQ people, which would naturally cause law enforcement to take interest. But with a good explanation included with the symbol, the person using the symbol is just a massive jerk rather than a terrorist.
It was the Supreme Court's decision that applied it to sexual OrientationActually that was the 1964 Civil Rights Act that gave the protection…it took a few years to find that these protections shielded a person from loving the “wrong” people.
but it has been expressed here that consequences are part of an evil authoritarian regime akin to NazismTo be effective they have to have consequences and be enforced. We seem to be moving away from enforcement and punishment, I don't think you can just blame the laws.
you can loose your job for being LGBTYou can lose your job over it. And it doesn't have to be intentional it is the perception that matters. Even telling someone you don't judge them is considered a micro aggression
Show me where it actually says that. Issues of the Constitutional Conventionbut all this is true. the Constitution institutionalized slavery and it actually says black people are not fully human or worth the same as a human being.
BullDiscrimination because of sexual Orientation is prohibited.
If you do you can sue and most likely prevail. Beyond Bostock: The Future of LGBTQ Civil RightsDouble post
Discrimination because of sexual Orientation is prohibited. The Supreme Court gave them equal protection
Bull
article 1 section 2Show me where it actually says that. Issues of the Constitutional Convention
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?