Zebra1552
Urban Nomad. Literally.
- Nov 2, 2007
- 14,461
- 820
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
- Politics
- US-Others
...only according to what society has established. You've heard of nude beaches. They don't care. Why should we?Jaws13
So what, vagina, a penis, breasts, testicles, buttocks. Why is thinking about these parts bad? They're normal body parts. You have some. Others have some. So you're aroused when you think about a vagina. Why is being aroused bad? IS IT bad?
Now, finally we're getting somewhere. What you mean exactly by normal body parts I'm not entirely certain.. If by normal you mean that we all have them then yes, they are all normal.. If normal is meant to suppose that we do not distinguish these specific body parts from others then no, no they're not normal. Are they not called private parts?
They were ashamed because their perceptions changed. Presumably their perceptions were okay with God and they didn't care about being naked then. So I'll ask you again. Why are these parts any different just because they have different names?Did Adam and Eve seek not to hid their shame of nakedness by covering themselves with fig leaves in the garden? Before the fall they were not ashamed of their nakedness before God, Genesis 2:24, afterwards what happened? How are we to understand this if these body parts are "normal?"
So what? Arousal isn't just for the purpose of sex. It heightens awareness as well as other physiological changes that are not just for the purpose of sex.Why is being aroused bad? Now we're coming full circle to my original question.."When a man or woman think sexual fantasies, thoughts, or everything of the like, who does this benefit?"
No being aroused is not bad, but it is for the purpose of sex no?
Fornication. Sex with someone other than your spouse. That says nothing about the purpose of sexual desire. Why bring up a verse that has nothing to do with this conversation?Sexual Intercourse is not bad not bad at all, but it has it's intended purpose as does everything in this current world.. 1 Corinthians 7:2 Nevertheless to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every women have her own husband."
Why? For what purpose?The issue is not arousal being evil or bad, but what is the object of your arousal and do you seek to control it and not let it manifest in thought or action...
It is also selfish to eat. To drink. To play video games. To work out. To sleep. And yet it is the sexual desire, not any of these, that gets condemned, even though it is more basic than video games and working out. Furthermore, you contradict yourself. You ask what it benefits, then you say it's selfish. Obviously it benefits something or people wouldn't do it.Now I speak... What does it benefit you to be aroused by a woman you're not married to? From this you desire to sleep with her for personal gratification...fleeting pleasure. This is selfishness.
You are wrong. A typical man actually marries more than one person in the US, if he marries at all.A woman is more than just skin and hair, and sex is intended to get to know her on her deepest most secret level out of perfect love, even spiritual love. Sex is meant to know someone even as god knows us, him by residing inside us through his spirit. Out of all the women a man sleeps with or thinks about sleeping with or being aroused by in his mind... how many does he marry? One. And even the one should not be daydreamt on prior to marriage.
What authority do you have to make these claims? Are you God?Don't worry about "how bad the sex would be if you don't experiment prior to marriage" Love will deal with this and god knows you better than you know yourself he'll find you the right mate.....You don't prematurely fantasize about her because, like God, you are more focused on that which is within than that which is without. I speak these things to your benefit.
Other times you are not desiring something you cannot have because the brain is able to create fake people through imagination, which you still have not addressed.Desiring something you cannot have leaves you to pursue it sometimes at all costs...
Pedophilia and rape are not set to fulfill some sexual desire, but a desire for power over others. You have no way of supporting this claim.If there was no lust or covetousness then surely there would be no rape, incest, adultery, pedophilia, perversions in pornography, perversions in the mind, perversions in speech, cheating, deceitfulness, agonizing sorrow for desiring but not having, and everything of the like.
You haven't even defined lust, so what gives you the right to condemn that which it may not be?We are not animals hopelessly enslaved to the way our body is programed; no doubt i believe that before the fall we weren't "turned on by sight" but perfect love for another triggered our sexual arousal....With this concept, the lust of the flesh is not normal or God given, but nothing more than a selfish and perverted distortion of the truth of love.
Content with wanting and desiring nothing? That is impossible.No, like The Apostle Paul we beat our bodies and make it our slaves. We are the children of God and for now are meant to be content with lack.. wanting and desiring nothing.. With the fruit of the Holy Ghost we are full and perfected.
You mean a poor attempt at a monologue, not a discourse. Discourse involves two people interaction. You have come into this thread with the attitude that you are right and anyone else is wrong, not for discussion.Understand how many hearts are broken from relationships ending because individuals were used for sex but past that nothing else valuable was found in them. This would no doubt be a non-issue if love was first perfected for and individual through that which is within.. then sex, in turn would, be all the more lovely... The only caveat to this issues is masturbation, though necessary for another thread, I feel the need to address it here. Since my discourse is already winded i will simply say this...
You assume that what you deem 'lust' is the lust of the Bible and that this conception automatically leads to bad things. Quite an assumption.Sexual tension is not a valid excuse, this concept is vague and misleading...Try denying yourself with the spirit that God gives and such a concept will vanish away just a quickly as those who touch, living selfishly, use it to defend their deeds. Heartbreak, selfishness, endless compliance to desires, and ignorance is not what God intended for his children...and i presume Jaws 13, you do not feel it was intended for you either.
No, you're saying it to be right and attempt to hold me accountable to you. You are not my friend and have no right to tell me what I can and cannot do, especially when you do not give evidence for your vague and outrageous claims. If you did it out of love, you wouldn't be calling me out.You see what lengthy reply I have written you... this is out of concern. I know nothing but what Christ reveals to me, and my love for him is even expressed now to you.
Upvote
0