Living Without Recognition

[angellica]

...which are based on discriminatory hate and fear, thank you for clarifying.

You know folks, I'm starting to get a creepy feeling this is HolyRoller dressed up in drag and come back to haunt us.

I do not HATE gays and I do not FEAR gays. I think BEING gay and DOING gay things is wrong.

 

[geekgirlkelli]

Well I can agree that I don't agree with YOUR Libertarian perspective, but everyone is different, and there are some that I do agree with in several areas. There are also some Republicans that I agree with in several areas. I'm really not one to be compared to the "typical" of either, though, because I don't fully side with one or the other.

LOL, *my* Libertarian perspective? No, see, as I have said, you do not understand at all what it means to be Libertarian. It has nothing to do with my "Libertarian perspective." But obviously you don't get it, don't want to get it, want to continue to live your little fantasy that you are somehow Libertarian and this Libertarian Christian will not continue to cast her pearls...

You are NOT a Libertarian, plain and simple.

 

[Pliny the Elder]

I would move to a civilized society where my morals and beliefs were respected and understood by others. I would not want to live in a place primarily filled with homosexuals and transgenders, to be perfectly honest.

You would hate California then.

 

[geekgirlkelli]

I do not HATE gays and I do not FEAR gays. I think BEING gay and DOING gay things is wrong.

I think being fat and overeating is wrong. The legislation to regulate what you can and cannot eat and how much you can eat is in the works.

 

[revanneosl]

You know folks, I'm starting to get a creepy feeling this is HolyRoller dressed up in drag and come back to haunt us.

You mean HolyRoller/The Bible Thumper/Funny Fundie?

It's possible, I suppose.

 

[angellica]

I think being fat and overeating is wrong. The legislation to regulate what you can and cannot eat and how much you can eat is in the works.

You could not afford to enforce something like that. However, you can easily afford to enforce the gay marriage ban by not allowing them to get married. That's where the whole majority thing comes into play.

 

[angellica]

LOL, *my* Libertarian perspective? No, see, as I have said, you do not understand at all what it means to be Libertarian. It has nothing to do with my "Libertarian perspective." But obviously you don't get it, don't want to get it, want to continue to live your little fantasy that you are somehow Libertarian and this Libertarian Christian will not continue to cast her pearls...

You are NOT a Libertarian, plain and simple.

I do not need you to tell me I am not Libertarian. I am not. I agree with some of their principles, so I am somewhat Libertarian, but not 100%. I have no idea what casting your pearls means.

 

[God-free]

I have no idea what casting your pearls means.

*gasp* tsk tsk tsk

~Barbara

 

[geekgirlkelli]

I do not need you to tell me I am not Libertarian. I am not. I agree with some of their principles, so I am somewhat Libertarian, but not 100%. I have no idea what casting your pearls means.

If you are not then why is it set as your political affiliation in your profile? And I still assert that you are not Libertarian at all, not even a smidgen. You either are or you're not.

And you don't know what casting your peals means? Even this GAY CHRISTIAN reads her Bible enough to know what that means!

 

[geekgirlkelli]

You could not afford to enforce something like that. However, you can easily afford to enforce the gay marriage ban by not allowing them to get married. That's where the whole majority thing comes into play.

Oh really? You don't watch the news much, do ya?

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/r...ing-obesity-south-la-to-ban-fast-food-joints/

 

[Pliny the Elder]

Oh really? You don't watch the news much, do ya?

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/r...ing-obesity-south-la-to-ban-fast-food-joints/

I am all for that.

 

[angellica]

Oh really? You don't watch the news much, do ya?

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/r...ing-obesity-south-la-to-ban-fast-food-joints/

Oh, that sounds great. The way you worded it, it sounded like they would not allow you to order over a certain quantity or something. This just says that basically the restaurants have to cut out the trans fat, which is great.

 

[Pliny the Elder]

Oh, that sounds great. The way you worded it, it sounded like they would not allow you to order over a certain quantity or something. This just says that basically the restaurants have to cut out the trans fat, which is great.

I think they should crack down on the obese and I would happily support it.

 

[angellica]

If you are not then why is it set as your political affiliation in your profile? And I still assert that you are not Libertarian at all, not even a smidgen. You either are or you're not.

And you don't know what casting your peals means? Even this GAY CHRISTIAN reads her Bible enough to know what that means!

Like I said, I don't put much emphasis on the label. I just agree in several ways with Libertarians and Republicans. It's just some symbol on here, nothing important.

Oh, I was thinking something else so nevermind.

 

[Pliny the Elder]

Like I said, I don't put much emphasis on the label. I just agree in several ways with Libertarians and Republicans. It's just some symbol on here, nothing important.

Oh, I was thinking something else so nevermind.

So what do you agree with Democrats on?

 

[geekgirlkelli]

Oh, that sounds great. The way you worded it, it sounded like they would not allow you to order over a certain quantity or something. This just says that basically the restaurants have to cut out the trans fat, which is great.

Restaurant owners should be allowed to serve what they see fit, should they not? And this is just the tip of the slippery slope. You think legislation that affects the consumer directly isn't around the corner?

http://usgovinfo.about.com/cs/consumer/a/aathinner.htm

 

[geekgirlkelli]

I think they should crack down on the obese and I would happily support it.

How about taking obese children away from their parents? Obviously the parents can't handle raising their children in a healthy manner and therefore are not fit parents.

 

[angellica]

Doing that in schools is fine. Children aren't old enough to make the right decisions, and we should point them in the right direction.

 

[angellica]

So what do you agree with Democrats on?

Nothing, really.

 

[Pliny the Elder]

How about taking obese children away from their parents? Obviously the parents can't handle raising their children in a healthy manner and therefore are not fit parents.

I am being sarcastic to show how ridiculous her arguments against homosexual marriage are.