J
JakeA
Guest
Homo= member of the hominid category, an ape.
Homo= anything from a chimpanzee to you in todays world.
You can't just change definitions because you don't like them, son.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Homo = man
Homo = human being in scholastic and vernacular writing
Suit yourself -- it's your confusion, not mine.Homo= member of the hominid category, an ape.
Homo= anything from a chimpanzee to you in todays world.
You can't just change definitions because you don't like them, son.
Note also Moses' refusal to consider the lineage attributed to him as well:
Hebrews 11:24 By faith Moses, when he was come to years, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh's daughter;
Suit yourself -- it's your confusion, not mine.
For the record, I don't consider myself a Homo sapiens; but I do consider myself a human being.
I'm not tied to the same rhetorical rules and regulations of science that you guys are, and I consider that a blessing.
I said this before, and I'll say it again: We are warned by The Manual not to consider ourselves Homo sapiens, as it can lead to atheism.
Note also Moses' refusal to consider the lineage attributed to him as well:
Hebrews 11:24 By faith Moses, when he was come to years, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh's daughter;
Note also Moses' refusal to consider the lineage attributed to him as well:
Hebrews 11:24 By faith Moses, when he was come to years, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh's daughter;
You do realise that homo sapiens sapiens means human being? You really don't, do you? You don't get that those two means exactly the same thing but in two different languages?
How about "människa" that's Swedish, do you accept that you are a "människa"?
Sometimes you come across people so hellbent on denying what ever they want to deny that they will change their own reality persona to achieve it, it's a fairly well known condition, schizophrenia.
I would say both.Did he genuinely believe that his biological mother was a woman who was not the Pharaoh's daughter, or was it more of a defiant rejection of the Pharaoh's values by declaring they had no relation to one another?
Link, please?To AV, words have magical powers. For instance, as he's freely admitted, if you accept the term homo sapiens for yourself, you'll turn into an atheist....
Suit yourself -- it's your confusion, not mine.
For the record, I don't consider myself a Homo sapiens; but I do consider myself a human being.
I said this before, and I'll say it again: We are warned by The Manual not to consider ourselves Homo sapiens, as it can lead to atheism.
Note also Moses' refusal to consider the lineage attributed to him as well:
Hebrews 11:24 By faith Moses, when he was come to years, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh's daughter;
You didn't read far enough, did you?That you make a connection between that verse and the label of Homo Sapiens has got to be the single saddest excuse for exegesis I've ever seen -- even from you, AV.
I would say both.
You read correctly -- the story starts here:I should have asked if Moses was actually the son of the Pharaoh's daughter. I have read that he in fact was adopted.
I'll go over this again, to the best of my ability.This line of reasoning doesn't really work unless he's knowingly rejecting an actual biological relation.
Do you think your God doesn't understand the difference between the labels of taxonomic classification and one's own arrogance and opinion of self? How stupid do you think He is?
Do you think your God doesn't understand the difference between the labels of taxonomic classification and one's own arrogance and opinion of self? How stupid do you think He is?
God is always made in one's own image.
Here:Link, please?
That's right, and I don't have to accept the title Homo sapiens, either.
In fact, the Bible says that can (and does) lead to atheism.
You read correctly -- the story starts here:
Exodus 2:1 ¶ And there went a man of the house of Levi, and took to wife a daughter of Levi.
Exodus 2:2 And the woman conceived, and bare a son: and when she saw him that he was a goodly child, she hid him three months.
Exodus 2:3 And when she could not longer hide him, she took for him an ark of bulrushes, and daubed it with slime and with pitch, and put the child therein; and she laid it in the flags by the river's brink.
I'll go over this again, to the best of my ability.
When you study the Bible in-depth, you learn that most times A = A; but it can also equal the equivalent of something else; as in A = B.
We call this "types", and the study of 'types' is called 'typology'.
Joseph, for example, is an excellent 'type' of Jesus Christ; being rejected by his own, only to be exalted later.
Moses, too, is a wonderful 'type' of Jesus Christ; leading his people out of [Egypt] and into the Promised Land, which land is itself a 'type' of the Christian life here on earth -- (not Heaven, as some think).
Egypt is a 'type' of the world -- (which I don't want to get into the ramifications, here) -- and Moses turning his back on Egypt as its future ruler, and preferring his own people is a 'type' of Christian not mingling with the philosophies of this world.
I hope this helps.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?