willieH: Hi gradyll... 
You actually crack me up, bro!
You abstain from addressing questions and points, yet as seen below, you ASK them, again and again, expecting answers!

One way conversations in conclusion, are useless.
But to show I am willing to be longsuffering where you are concerned as a brother in the Lord, as was my savior with me, ...just this once more, shall I bother to do that which YOU are unwilling to do, ...that being, answering your questions!
Obviously you are not aware of how a simple conversation or discussion works... You say what you will, then I ...ADDRESS what you say...
THEN ...I say what I will, and YOU ADDRESS what I say... really bro, it aint that hard.
Before I begin, ...WHERE is your REFUTE of MY WORDS, gradyll? Oh yeah... I forgot, ...you have NONE...
Now to answer your SCRIPTURE-LESS proposals WITH SCRIPTURE:
No. I have implied no such thing. A SON of any given species, is OF the species of the PARENT. GOD has noted in His WORD that NATURE identifies Him as well as does His WORD -- Rom 1:20
In NATURE, ...in ANY case and in ANY species, ...the SON is not the ORIGIN of himself, ...he gains his existence by the PARENT which PRECEEDED him...
MAN is of the "SPECIES" of GOD -- Psalm 82:6 -- MADE in His IMAGE -- Gen 1:7 -- The GENEOLOGY (descendency) of JESUS CHRIST is seen in BOTH notations in the NEW TESTAMENT, as part of and within that of MEN -- Matt 1:1-16 [geneology of FAITH] -- Luke 3:23-38 [geneology of FLESH]
MAN (of which JESUS was a part -- 1 Tim 2:6), ...is NOT the origin of Himself, He is, ...in totality... a CREATED grouping, which includes JESUS CHRIST -- Heb 2:9 -- "...was MADE a little lower than the angels, FOR the suffering of DEATH"
GOD, cannot DIE, ...GOD is EVERLASTING, WITHOUT interupption of LIFE.
JESUS' life was absent 3 days... then He was RESURRECTED to LIFE again -- Matt 12:40 -- that YOU do not accept that which IS WRITTEN, and instead refer to the documentations and opinions of men (wikipedia, Latin bible, philosphers, and the potentially erroneous opinions of religious icons), ...is your own shameful affair.
BOOK >>> CHAPTER >>> VERSE
...where the word TRINITY is found.
Enough with references of MEN... Get to the WORD gradyll, or are you unable?
BOOK >>> CHAPTER >>> VERSE
...where the word TRINITY is found.
BOOK >>> CHAPTER >>> VERSE
...where the word TRINITY is found.
You avoid employing the WORD of YHVH God to support your beliefs (trinity), simply because your beliefs are not FOUNDED in it.
Your beliefs are founded in the references that you have CLEARLY noted above:
(1) "wikipedia"...
(2) The "Latin bible" (which does not bring up the word "trinity")...
(3) Little diagrams YOU construct...
(4) The HEARSAY of other MEN (Tertullian, Theophilus, and whoever else)
(5) Your own opinions...
DEVOID of the useage of the SCRIPTURES... FULL of the writings and opinions of MEN.
Such a pity, that you are unable as well as UNWILLING to acknowledge this crooked pathway...
Praise the GOOD NEWS of, ...Peace.... 
...willieH

You actually crack me up, bro!
You abstain from addressing questions and points, yet as seen below, you ASK them, again and again, expecting answers!

One way conversations in conclusion, are useless.
But to show I am willing to be longsuffering where you are concerned as a brother in the Lord, as was my savior with me, ...just this once more, shall I bother to do that which YOU are unwilling to do, ...that being, answering your questions!
Obviously you are not aware of how a simple conversation or discussion works... You say what you will, then I ...ADDRESS what you say...
THEN ...I say what I will, and YOU ADDRESS what I say... really bro, it aint that hard.
Before I begin, ...WHERE is your REFUTE of MY WORDS, gradyll? Oh yeah... I forgot, ...you have NONE...

Now to answer your SCRIPTURE-LESS proposals WITH SCRIPTURE:
How could Jesus be the offspring of God, as you say....and yet not be God himself. Are you saying that God gave birth to a non God?
No. I have implied no such thing. A SON of any given species, is OF the species of the PARENT. GOD has noted in His WORD that NATURE identifies Him as well as does His WORD -- Rom 1:20
In NATURE, ...in ANY case and in ANY species, ...the SON is not the ORIGIN of himself, ...he gains his existence by the PARENT which PRECEEDED him...
MAN is of the "SPECIES" of GOD -- Psalm 82:6 -- MADE in His IMAGE -- Gen 1:7 -- The GENEOLOGY (descendency) of JESUS CHRIST is seen in BOTH notations in the NEW TESTAMENT, as part of and within that of MEN -- Matt 1:1-16 [geneology of FAITH] -- Luke 3:23-38 [geneology of FLESH]
MAN (of which JESUS was a part -- 1 Tim 2:6), ...is NOT the origin of Himself, He is, ...in totality... a CREATED grouping, which includes JESUS CHRIST -- Heb 2:9 -- "...was MADE a little lower than the angels, FOR the suffering of DEATH"
GOD, cannot DIE, ...GOD is EVERLASTING, WITHOUT interupption of LIFE.
JESUS' life was absent 3 days... then He was RESURRECTED to LIFE again -- Matt 12:40 -- that YOU do not accept that which IS WRITTEN, and instead refer to the documentations and opinions of men (wikipedia, Latin bible, philosphers, and the potentially erroneous opinions of religious icons), ...is your own shameful affair.
as far as the trinity in the latin bible, it's not there I forgot. The word has etymology that is later than the early writings of the Bible.
BOOK >>> CHAPTER >>> VERSE
...where the word TRINITY is found."The English word Trinity is derived from Latin Trinitas, meaning "the number three, a triad".[9] This abstract noun is formed from the adjective trinus (three each, threefold, triple),[10] as the word unitas is the abstract noun formed from unus (one)."- wikipedia
Enough with references of MEN... Get to the WORD gradyll, or are you unable?
BOOK >>> CHAPTER >>> VERSE
...where the word TRINITY is found.turtullian coined the term trinity after the Bible was already written. "This word is derived from the Greek word trias, first used by Theophilus (A.D. 168-183), or from the Latin trinitas, first used by Tertullian (A.D. 220), to express this doctrine."
from Trinity (WebBible⢠Encyclopedia) - ChristianAnswers.Net
![]()
BOOK >>> CHAPTER >>> VERSE
...where the word TRINITY is found.You avoid employing the WORD of YHVH God to support your beliefs (trinity), simply because your beliefs are not FOUNDED in it.
Your beliefs are founded in the references that you have CLEARLY noted above:
(1) "wikipedia"...
(2) The "Latin bible" (which does not bring up the word "trinity")...
(3) Little diagrams YOU construct...
(4) The HEARSAY of other MEN (Tertullian, Theophilus, and whoever else)
(5) Your own opinions...
DEVOID of the useage of the SCRIPTURES... FULL of the writings and opinions of MEN.

Such a pity, that you are unable as well as UNWILLING to acknowledge this crooked pathway...

Praise the GOOD NEWS of, ...Peace.... 
...willieH

Upvote
0
