LovingOne
Active Member
Well I see what you're saying, but I didn't "insinuate" anything. Forgive me if I didn't make myself very clear.Daniels Mommy said:Well, I wasn't spanked as a child, and I think it is insulting to insinuate that because my husband and I choose not to wilfully inflict pain on our children we will cause them to somehow be dysfunctional later in life. Godly discipline, huh? Which God would that be? The angry, vengeful God of the Old Testament who commanded His people to smite their enemies, even the babies of their enemies? Or the loving, compassionate, giving God of the New Testament who commanded His people to love their enemies as themselves?
The word "dysfunctional" came from the Bible.com website under the catagory for spanking children. I only repeated it. It is all backed up by Bible scripture on that Bible.com site. So that would be the one and only God our Father in heaven. Humans on earth don't always understand God's actions, which are ONLY for the good of everything. Humans don't always see or understand that, so they sometimes mistake God for being "angry" or "vengeful". God is a loving God, even though humans mistake some of his actions as being unloving. But it's just that, a mistake on the part of people who don't know all the answers, only God does. There are not 2 different gods, there is only one, the Creator of all. There is not a bad god or good god. There is only one REAL God. The Bible is God's Word -- all of it (not just the NT or the OT... all of it is). If you don't agree with that, it's okay with me. It's just something I believe in my Christian faith.
Whatever is working for you and your husband, stick with it....LOL. If you feel there is no need for spanking at this point, then great. Not every child is the same and not every situation applies to every child.Daniels Mommy said:We parent (and therefore discipline) in a loving, compassionate, and firm manner. We have no need for physically harming our child.
I do wish to say that I don't see spanking as "phyically harming" a child. Spanking, when done properly, does not harm the child at all. Children can accidentally cut their finger or fall off their bike and physically get hurt a lot worse than a spanking does. Spanking goes not leave physical marks or scars... so it is not "physically harming" them. If you disagree with this too, that's okay. You're entitled to your opinion.
Daniels Mommy said:Teaching a child not to run into the street is a parent's responsibility. Spanking your child because he/she runs into the street may serve only to confuse them. Why not try, "We do not run into the street. Here is why..."
I gave a specific example earlier of my 4 year old who evidently does not understand the WHY (as what you suggested we should tell.... and we HAVE told him already, many times).Daniels Mommy said:If you don't teach your children NOT to run into the street, then yeah you're doing them a huge disservice. We choose NOT to inflict pain on our children.
I agree, every parent should tell their children the dangers of getting hit by a car... and KEEP telling them until they understand it. But in my case, the tiny little spanking along with my talking is what helped my son realize that he needs to hold my hand and not just take off on his own. He learned from the spanking that there is something seriously bad about the wrongdoing here and even though he doesn't fully understand the safety issue yet, he understands the seriousness of his mother's action. He understands that I mean what I said and I expect him to do what I said no matter what.
One of these days he will finally understand what it means to get hit by a car. I'm not going to let him learn this the hard way. A little pat on the rear is nothing compared to what COULD happen to him.
I don't believe that spanking should be used to "get a point across". Spanking should be used a punishment for a wrongdoing. There is a difference. If you want to get a point across, then talk to your children. I know I don't have to tell you this, as I know you DO talk to them. I know you don't allow your children to run free and be unruly... and talking to them is one of the best ways to teach them right from wrong. Whatever you and your husband are doing, if it is clearly working, then by all means, stick with it. Nothing wrong with that....LOL. No one is saying you need to start spanking them.Daniels Mommy said:OK whatever. It's not like we've decided to allow our children to run free and be unruly. We will be disciplining them when it is necessary. But we will NOT hit our children with our hands, or other weapons to get our point across.
I have only mentioned that with some children there are times when spanking is necessary.... when simply talking or other alternatives clearly are not working. This may not apply to your children right now... may not ever apply to your children. There are some kids that are generally easy-going enough that simple talking or less harsh punishment is all that is ever needed. But please know not all kids come out of the same mold. My children are a fine example of that. My daughter is now 12... she was always the perfect, good kid. Never had to spank her (until she got to be 11... and I won't go into detail on that). My son has always been the opposite of my daughter. He has been a challenge, that's for sure. Sometimes he responds well to just talking or a time-out... but there are other times when talking till you're blue in the face or a time-out, or taking away a favorite toy or something like that DOES NOT work. In those cases, a good old fashioned spanking is the only thing that DID work.
So all I'm saying is... whatever is working for people, they need to keep doing that. If talking is working for you in EVERY case, then great. It doesn't work for EVERY child because children are born with different personalities and temperment. They don't all behave the same way, naturally. They don't all react to the same things in the same way. So what works well with one may not necessarily work well with another. That's all I mean. I don't wish to upset you over anything. I am not telling you to change whatever is working for you. I have never said that. I'm sure you are a terrific parent!!!
Parents that see no need to spank and things truly work without a spanking are not doing anything improperly.... so I'm not arguing that not spanking is always bad. It is not. It should be the goal of every parent NOT to spank.... to use that more severe form of punishment only when needed.Daniels Mommy said:Parents who choose not to spank are not disciplining improperly. To even suggest such a thing is unfair and unfounded.
But parents who refuse to spank when clearly a child needs one is not doing that child any favors by holding out. The key word here is "when needed". The whole idea of spanking is is not MY idea, but comes from the Bible. It is a fact of life that people often think God is unfair. We must remember that our children are not OUR children, but God's. He has given them to us to raise. It is a blessing. But we still should abide by God's laws in how we raise those children while they're in our care. God expects us to follow His laws. That is my belief.
Really?..well I've witnessed just the opposite...LOL. Those in my neck of the woods that came from homes where parents spanked for wrongdoings, were the kids that were well-mannered and grew up to be the kindnest, most understanding and caring individuals I know.Daniels Mommy said:Actually, yes : EVERY SINGLE REBELLIOUS PERSON I have ever known was spanked as a child. They grew up in very strict homes where they weren't allowed any freedom of expression, and the least little things were rewarded with spankings.
The ones that were not spanked, were very out-of-control children where their parents simply looked the other way when "little Cathy" did things she should have been scolded for. Those are the same kids that got into drugs and stuff in high school... and even today as adults are still doing the drugs and thinking they can just do whatever they want to do without any consequences. In fact, one such person is my husband's cousin, who often drives drunk, won't get a job, just bums around doing whatever he feels like doing without any concern for others. He has been arrested several times for DWI and even caused a bad accident where one of his buddy's was killed. He went to prison over that. He is out now and "trying" to get his act together, but it boils down to... his mama didn't ever discipline him, especially never spanked him. He got away with everything he ever wanted. Do you see what lack of discipline can do to a person when they are allowed to think they can just do whatever they want without consequences? That's what I'm talking about. I understand that you probably disagree due to your different experience with people. That's okay.
I agree, proper discipline is made up of a variety of different things. The same action doesn't always apply to every situation and neither does the same action always apply to every kid.Daniels Mommy said:You see, "proper" discipline means a lot of different things to different parents. For you and for others, spanking works. For me and for others, spanking is a cruel option.
For ME, spanking is the very least action applied to any wrongdoing. It is saved for ONLY those times when the child has repeatedly done the wrongdoing after being told about it before...yet still chooses to do it. Do I think spanking is a "cruel option"? No, and the reason for that is that there's nothing "cruel" about it when done properly and not in any abusive way, such as in anger or used too often, or used too strongly (causing injury). Sure, I agree that anything that causes injury to a child is cruel, but spanking does not cause injury to a child. It is just a form of punishment. If there are no consequences for wrongdoing, then kids just get away with doing whatever they want to do. As long as God's Word says spanking is the proper discipline, then I know there is nothing wrong with it. God is not cruel. He wants what's best for His children. Kids have to be trained how to behave. Good behavior is not something they are born with. That's my opinion.
How's that? Please read these scriptures:Daniels Mommy said:A parent who wilfully causes their child pain is not doing them any favors.
Proverbs 13:24(KJV): "He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes."
Proverbs 13:24(AMP): "He who spares his rod (of discipline) hates his son, but he who loves him diligently disciplines and punishes him early."
Proverbs 22:15: "Foolishness is bound up in the heart of a child, but the rod of discipline will drive it far from him."
Proverbs 23:13-14: "Withold not discipline from the child, for if you strike and punish him with the (reed-like) rod, he will not die. Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and shalt deliver his soul from hell."
My belief is that God's will should be done, not man's will. That is just my Christian belief.
Upvote
0