forgivenmuch
christ is the answer
i can speak for myself, i choose not to spank. i have done so much research on the matter before my son was born. and i see that not spanking was the best choice for me.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Beth1231 said:Loving One,
Beth1231 said:wow, you posted so much on this thread! I learned some new insights from your comments. Plus, I want to say I'm impressed how you kept such a cool head when people starting losing their tempers....
Beth1231 said:But that's not what I want to post about. Loving One, you mentioned a few times that when you spank your children, that you aren't really causing pain. It's more the "action" then the "force". Well, I have been sitting here trying to guess how a "painless" spanking from my mom or dad would have affected me (if that's all they used; no "painful" spankings to compare it to). I cannot say for sure, but I'm leaning towards thinking I would have been relieved. Something along the lines of "oh good, now I can do what I want to do, because it doesn't hurt." Your post definitely got me thinking. Is it possible to punish a child if it's not "painful" to them? By that last statement I am thinking of more than spanking. If mom took away the television, I could have cared less. I wanted to be outside or reading, not watching TV. Since that punishment was "painless", mom's "action" would not have affected me (at least, I don't think it would have). So, in the same vein of logic doesn't the "action" of spanking have to be "painful" to some degree? I remember after a spanking experiencing maybe thirty seconds of "ouch, that hurts/stings" sensation. The action and the pain together got my attention and led me to the conclusion of "let's not do that again". Any thoughts on this? Maybe your children are simply more compliant than I was as a child? And less prone to try to figure you out to get what they want? Thanks for any replies! Since you have mentioned that God's ideas mean much much more than our "opinions", I am very interested in what you have to say.
First, I want to say that's terrific that you have such an awesome relationship with both of your parents.Beth1231 said:P.S I have an awesome relationship with both parents![]()
Thanks for explaining this for me. I understand it better now.Daniels Mommy said:A majority of Christians believe themselves to be "New Testament Christians," like me, meaning that the Old Testament is a learning tool but we are to take it with a grain of salt. After all, Jesus stated that the Old Covenant died on the cross with Him. That doesn[t mean that the word is any less valid, it just means that our laws and governing words come from the New Testament more so than the Old. HTH
Nobody would disagree with you that we ought to discipline. The issues are:kingzjewel said:i try and take my cues on discipline straight from the SOURCE. He says that He disciplines those He loves. so i discipline the one i love. in His inspired words of wisdom He says "spare the rod, spoil the child" and therefore i do not spoil my child. there are many ways to get through to a child, but mine responds to firm voices, threats of spankings, and actual spankings. why? i dont really know why he is stubborn and hard headed * whistles and looks away * , but i do know that if i had never been brought up by these same principles i wouldnt be who i am today.
http://christianparty.8m.com/bibldisc.htm
To the "God is a person of the NT and ditched the OT" person: WHAT?????? All I can think of is the awesome chapters of Psalms and Proverbs that are clearly annointed and speak to us today. The powerful stories of faith of Abraham, Moses, Esther, Ruth...so many! Some are summarized in the NT by the way....
It's a lack of understanding to say something like the OT is irrelevant. Or worse, parts of it are irrevelant simply because I am uncomfortable with it. Yes, I know Jesus is the new Covenant. He made it clear that the laws on divorce, eating and drinking and washing and some other things no longer apply. He even explained why they were in affect during the OT "because of the hardness of their hearts" and other reasons. Ok, ok, I know this isn't a debate forum, so I will stop there. Just consider carefully before you try to throw out Scriptures on discipline simply because they make you uncomfortable. Discipline is no fun for mom or dad or the child. But a loving parent will do it. Ok, I'm done![]()
I am not a parent but spanking with or without an object is no good at all. It harms a child, that's for sure.Daniels Mommy said:What do you think about spanking with an object (for example : a belt, a spoon, a switch, etc)?
You know how I feel about this, but how do YOU feel?
IMO most of the people who are in jail were treated badly when they were children. I think most of them suffered from physical abuse.dyanm said:The LACK of spanking is why Americans have the most overcrowded jails in the world.![]()
setzie said:We'll have to disagree on that one
"Reenactment of childhood victimization is the major cause of violence in our society.
·Numerous-studies have documented that most violent criminals were physically or sexually abused as children. (Groth, 1979; Seghorn et al, 1987)"
Source: http://www.annafoundation.org/wchac-stats.html
"Child victimization" is not a spanking given by a parent who loves their child and is teaching them to obey. Violent criminals got thrown across the room, molested, burned and all kinds of other atrocitries. The difference is like scolding your child because they ran across the street without holding your hand from screaming at your child and tossing them back in front of the truck!
The thing with spanking is that it can harm a child. No matter how soft it is. Even if you just threaten a child with spanking the child may suffer. Often a child can not understand the reason for the punishing. It may stop doing things because of the spanking, but it won't stop doing them because the child realizes that it was wrong. It will stop doing forbidden things because of the spanking.
They know why they are getting spanked, yes. Because they have done something bad. But they don't know why the thing is actually bad. Small kids don't do anything bad on purpose, so you basically punish them because they don't know something.Beth1231 said:It's supposed to hurt (at least a little) to get the message across that the parent is serious about the child stopping whatever it is they were doing. And believe me, a threat works wonders for some kids. The only "harm" is the adrenaline that pumps through their system and makes them realize that backtalking or disobeying is not such a great plan after all. And kids are much smarter than it seems you are giving them credit for. A three year old can clearly tell when mom and dad don't want him to do something. He is absolutely bright enough to decide to rebel and test who is in charge. Anyone with any experience at all with kids knows this! If the parent taught them about rebellion and obedience, they know what they are doing is wrong (disobeying mom and dad). They know why they are getting a spanking (a smart mom and dad will summarize though before the punishment) and they know they deserved it!
Fair enough. I am not saying that the effects of spanking are the same for every child. But even in your case ( in every case ) I believe that it actually harmed you. I believe that there is always a better option than spanking.Beth1231 said:And...although this may seem hard to believe....kids respect mom and dad for earning the right to steer them. And if mom and dad remain consistent, that respect will mature and the child will someday thank their parents for having the guts to spank them when they deserved it. I thanked my Dad for being consistent and firm and loving with my brother and I when I was in college. It was as I was driving home from another childcare situation. The kids were completely out of control and I could do nothing about it. I have never appreciated my parents decision to discipline us more than that day.
I have not listened to society on that issue. I am speaking from my own experience. I've also spoken to many people about that, and not one of them was of the opinion that the spanking they experienced in their childhood was good.Beth1231 said:Don't be so quick to accept what society tells us. Society is interested in doing what they want to do, with no one telling them what is "right" or "wrong". A society that is in rebellion against God is most definitely going to be against parents who are trying to instill obedience and reverence for God in their children.
setzie said:They know why they are getting spanked, yes. Because they have done something bad. But they don't know why the thing is actually bad. Small kids don't do anything bad on purpose, so you basically punish them because they don't know something.
I am not against setting boundaries, I rather think that spanking or shouting is by far the worst possible way of doing it.
setzie said:Fair enough. I am not saying that the effects of spanking are the same for every child. But even in your case ( in every case ) I believe that it actually harmed you. I believe that there is always a better option than spanking.
setzie said:I have not listened to society on that issue. I am speaking from my own experience. I've also spoken to many people about that, and not one of them was of the opinion that the spanking they experienced in their childhood was good.
I am actually astonished about some things that are written in this thread. If you spank an adult you can get punished for that. How can it be OK then to spank a child?
setzie said:I find it really sad that some victims of physical abuse think that it was good to be spanked by their parents. And the same victims tend to use the same methods on their children and effectively become wrongdoers.
setzie said:Think twice before you abuse your children.
Beth1231 said:I apologize for going on a little tangent and changing the thread.....
On the jail thing...
If you were to go into jail and talk to some of the men there (like Chuck Colson), you would find out that most of them wished their fathers loved them enough to steer them in the right direction when they were young. Today, little kids are allowed to do whatever they please as long as it's not dangerous. A two or three year old can blatantly defy mom (or even dad!) and know there is no danger of a spanking. Most kids aren't even aware they exist!
Quick story (because now I'm all stirred up over this)...I was babysitting a four year old girl and her two year old brother. She decided that she wanted to "ride" her huge teddybear down the stairs (about twenty of them!). I, of course, got pretty stern and told her she couldn't, it wasn't safe, etc. Finally, because it was turning into a physical struggle, I called for her Dad. Well, he comes down the hall and says "no, honey we can't do that. You need to listen to Beth." She didn't show healthy fear of dad in the slightest. In fact, as soon as Dad turned his back on her, she was silently fighting me again to ride teddy down the steps. I was almost in shock. I couldn't believe a four year old didn't have more respect for authority (especially her dad) than that. I told my husband later that if my babysitter had called for my dad, I would have scooted off to my room super quick because I would have known I was in trouble for defying the babysitter enough that she had to call for him! What is happening to our kids these days? I bet a million bucks that that little girl wouldn't have tried that stunt if a wooden spoon was hanging on a nail in the kitchen to remind her that she isn't in charge. Ok, enough ranting from me, I suppose...![]()