KIND = GENUS

[Kylie]

Is Boloceroides daphneae of the same Kind as Boloceroides mcmurrichi?

Yes.

Now, another question:

Is Relicanthus daphneae of the same Kind as Boloceroides mcmurrichi?

Remember, we are talking about Biblical kinds here.

 

[AV1611VET]

Remember, we are talking about Biblical kinds here.

A kind is a classification of animals created by God in 4004 BC to replenish the earth.

That classification is known today as "genus".

 

[DogmaHunter]

i think that the most close definition of creation kind is at the family level (since many species in the same family can interbreed). and since there are only about 1000 femilies in nature we only need a place to about 2000 creatures. most of them are small.

And then, after the physically impossible and magical flood, mega-super-duper-physically-impossible-hyper evolution sets in and all that is perfectly sensible in your head.

But evolution at the rate that we actually observe it to happen, no, that's "to far fetched".

Uhu.

 

[DogmaHunter]

You do realize that man is in the Hominidae family don't you?

Hominidae - Wikipedia

No, man doesn't count, those "kind" and "species" things is only for animal.
Man is a special narcistic case, the prefered children of god in his likeness, the whole point of a universe that is 90 billion lightyears across which contains some 250 billion galaxies each consisting of some 250 billion stars. Didn't you know?

 

[AV1611VET]

No, man doesn't count, those "kind" and "species" things is only for animal.

I'm impressed.

I seriously didn't know you could figure that out.

 

[DogmaHunter]

I'm impressed.

I seriously didn't know you could figure that out.

I'ld say "Poe's Law strikes once again", but you probably figured out also that it was sarcasm and just wanted a little cheap shot in, just... well.... because.

 

[AV1611VET]

I'ld say "Poe's Law strikes once again", but you probably figured out also that it was sarcasm and just wanted a little cheap shot in, just... well.... because.

No, it wasn't.

In all my time I've been here, I can't remember when an atheist ever exempted the human race from Linnaeus' Satan's classification system.

And yes, I realize you were employing sarcasm, but even your sarcasm tells me you could think that up and convey it from our point of view.

 

[DogmaHunter]

No, it wasn't.

In all my time I've been here, I can't remember when an atheist ever exempted the human race from Linnaeus' Satan's classification system.

lol

And yes, I realize you were employing sarcasm, but even your sarcasm tells me you could think that up and convey it from our point of view.

It really isn't hard to create some satirical creationist position.

 

[AV1611VET]

It really isn't hard to create some satirical creationist position.

And be right at the same time?

 

[xianghua]

You do realize that man is in the Hominidae family don't you?

Hominidae - Wikipedia

of course. this is why i use the words "the most close definition".

 

[Subduction Zone]

of course. this is why i use the words "the most close definition".

So you want to make a special pleading fallacy.

 

[Kylie]

A kind is a classification of animals created by God in 4004 BC to replenish the earth.

That classification is known today as "genus".

Blah blah blah, got an answer to my question?

Is Relicanthus daphneae of the same Kind as Boloceroides mcmurrichi?

 

[AV1611VET]

Blah blah blah, got an answer to my question?

Is Relicanthus daphneae of the same Kind as Boloceroides mcmurrichi?

Blah blah blah, you decide.

I think I've given you enough information that you can decide for yourself.

If you need it again, here it is:

Kind = Genus
1. God is their common designer.
2. Created to replenish the earth.

 

[Kylie]

Blah blah blah, you decide.

I think I've given you enough information that you can decide for yourself.

If you need it again, here it is:

Kind = Genus
1. God is their common designer.
2. Created to replenish the earth.

I want to know what YOU have decided.

How ironic, you have in the past given your opinion when it isn't asked for, yet now that it IS asked for you keep silent!

 

[Subduction Zone]

I want to know what YOU have decided.

How ironic, you have in the past given your opinion when it isn't asked for, yet now that it IS asked for you keep silent!

When one knows that one is wrong one also usually recognizes a trap when one runs across them.

 

[Kylie]

@AV1611VET, I'd like to hear your answer...

 

[AV1611VET]

@AV1611VET, I'd like to hear your answer...

1 Chronicles 26:18 At Parbar westward, four at the causeway, and two at Parbar.

 

[Kylie]

1 Chronicles 26:18 At Parbar westward, four at the causeway, and two at Parbar.

Once again, can you actually answer the question? Posting random Bible verses only tells me you have nothing, and yet I am asking you a simple yes or no question.

Is Relicanthus daphneae of the same Kind as Boloceroides mcmurrichi?

 

[Kylie]

@AV1611VET, is Relicanthus daphneae of the same Kind as Boloceroides mcmurrichi?

 

[AV1611VET]

@AV1611VET, is Relicanthus daphneae of the same Kind as Boloceroides mcmurrichi?

1 Chronicles 26:18 At Parbar westward, four at the causeway, and two at Parbar.