I guess that raises an interesting question: is the right to bear and have access to guns an "essential liberty" and if so, why?As the NRA does a great job protecting our second amendment
rights, I support the same candidates that they support. I know
you're attempting to vilify them, but all your articles show is that
they're doing what their members want them to do.
No other developed country that I can think of considers that an "essential" right, if one at all. It seems that the answer to that question is culturally contingent. Does the implementation of more rigid restrictions pose a threat to that "essential right"?
Would it be reasonable to disallow a blind man access to deadly arms, or would his essential right be assuaged by such an action?
Upvote
0