- Dec 25, 2003
- 42,070
- 16,820
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And yet when you point out that black players are overrepresented in the NBA...you're told "well that's different."
"Diversity" is really just a racist dog whistle for "we want less white men".
Poor oppressed white men.
That's increasingly the way they see it.
Interesting. I am one and I don't see it that way.
That doesn't surprise me...the reasons why you don't see it that way are apparent in your posts.
It's not as if you'd ever say "poor oppressed black men" in a condescending manner, is it?
Cool story bro.
Well, seeing as how I'm a white man and I know that white men aren't oppressed.
Who exactly made you the official spoke person? Yourself?Well, seeing as how I'm a white man and I know that white men aren't oppressed
Oh wow...so you now speak for white men everywhere? {snip}
Can't defend your argument? Invoke a logical fallacy! Even if you have to make one up!
A sentence begging with the word "so" does not automatically make a straw man and certainly not a automatic "I WIN you lose!". Which in this case it's not a straw man, as Ana the Ist point out the implications by him replyingIt's so cool to see So's Law validated.
when you saidOh wow...so you now speak for white men everywhere?
As you are projecting your experience onto a broad group of people defined by a trait, by acting that you know every single one of them and speaking on behalf of them, which come across as condescending and arrogant.Well, seeing as how I'm a white man and I know that white men aren't oppressed
Ugh, this tactic is so tiresome and insipid. It's especially ironic given that you didn't think I was a white man - That's increasingly the way they see it. - implying I'm not one of "they". Well, "Ana", I am one of "they" and white men, in America are not oppressed. Any of us who "sees it that way" is just looking to be aggrieved.Your words...
"I'm a white man and I know that white men aren't oppressed"
Of course, you could always admit that being white doesn't give you access to the experiences of all white men so it's entirely possible there are oppressed white men...
...or you could double down on this " Im white therefore..." argument and see how that works for you .
Still crying about So's Law I see.Can't defend your argument? Invoke a logical fallacy! Even if you have to make one up!
No one uses your "law" outside the CF fourms, as that is certainly something you literately made up.Still crying about So's Law I see.
Where did he said that? Quotes please.It's especially ironic given that you didn't think I was a white man
No one uses your "law" outside the CF fourms, as that is certainly something you literately made up.
That seems to be the only defense some people can give.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?