• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Israel-Hamas Thread II

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,848
7,588
✟750,743.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
No. A population has been relocated forcibly, and bombed relentlessly they are in no shape to try and find terrorists and scold them
They had 17 years to do that. Too late for them now. You reap what you sow.
Confrontation is not bombing their civilians. That is terrorizing them
As I pointed out......the result of electing a terrorist organization to run your govt. How'd that work out for them? Not too well it seems.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Chesterton
Upvote 0

o_mlly

“Behold, I make all things new.”
May 20, 2021
3,136
574
Private
✟118,492.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
No, I want to see if you could even envisage a solution. Other than death and destruction.
As previously posted, given that Israel is prosecuting a just war against an unjust aggressor, Option 1 following ius in bello principles. Can you cite a war that did not incur "death and destruction"? I think not. Can you cite a war that did not cause one innocent person's death? I think not.

Apparently, you want to play a game on the number of innocent deaths beyond which prosecuting a just war is no longer moral. That notion is nonsensical. See Genesis 18:16-33.
 
Upvote 0

JosephZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2017
4,497
4,407
Davao City
Visit site
✟301,898.00
Country
Philippines
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
We have a saying here: 'Elections have consequences.' The Gazans are finding that out first hand.
They had 17 years to do that. Too late for them now. You reap what you sow.
I mentioned earlier in the thread how Hamas gained control of Gaza.

Hamas only received 44.45% of the vote in 2006, but it gave them a majority of 74 seats in the 132 seat Palestinian Legislative Council at that time. Less than 15% of Gazans alive today voted for Hamas. In 2007, Hamas violently took control of Gaza.

Hamas gunmen seized military control of the Gaza Strip on Thursday, executing Fatah rivals and provoking the collapse of their power-sharing Palestinian Authority government.

As Fatah’s last security command centers fell after four days of fighting, Hamas military men in black masks moved unchallenged across Gaza City, hunting down foes, blowing up homes and dragging the body of a top Fatah militant through the streets.

Firing mortars, grenade launchers and automatic weapons, Hamas fighters captured the Gaza City headquarters of the Preventive Security, Intelligence and National Security agencies Thursday afternoon, and executed some of their captives. The Presidential Guard compound fell late in the evening. All were controlled by Fatah.

Earlier in the day, Hamas overran the main Fatah compound in the southern city of Rafah, giving it full control of the border with Egypt, a source of the smuggled weapons that have expanded the movement’s arsenal in recent months.

Hamas fighters overran the headquarters amid mortar rounds and gunfire. They raised green Hamas flags over the shattered two-story compound, kneeled to the ground in prayer and marched handcuffed Fatah gunmen into the streets, some shirtless or in their underwear.



Last month in another thread, I gave my opinion on why Hamas has been allowed to stay in power. It can be found here. Since that thread has been closed and I can't quote it, I will post it again.


"Based on my personal experience and observations while working in communities where terrorists have established themselves and their terrorist activities go unchallenged by the people living in these communities, there are a couple of reasons I can think of as to why Palestinians wouldn't want to get involved in, or cooperate with authorities in exposing Hamas terrorists. For one, Palestinians in Gaza live in an environment where turning against Hamas could pose significant risks to their lives, livelihoods, and families. They allow Hamas to operate in Gaza mostly because they are afraid that if they refuse, they will be its next victims. Another reason is that most Palestinians in Gaza are too busy struggling to survive from day to day to concern themselves with Hamas. They have enough problems already.

I can guarantee you that if Hamas is ever eliminated in Gaza, the Palestinians will be celebrating in the streets."




Below is an excellent US Today article that does an great job in explaining why so many Palestinians voted for Hamas, their feelings towards both Hamas and Israel, and why they haven't been able to remove them from power. It also confirms the reasons I gave earlier as to why Gazans have allowed Hamas to remain in power and their communities. I suggest those blaming Gazans for Hamas' actions click on the link and read the entire article.


Long before Hamas's murderous rampage in Israel on Oct. 7, the group made a name for itself with its ruthless takeover of Gaza in 2007.

Its calling card? Killing its political rivals execution style in the streets, in hospital shootouts, and by throwing them off the rooftops of high-rise buildings. Since then, arbitrary detention, torture and enforced disappearances has been a hallmark of the regime.

Yet now, some Palestinians are "self-silencing" how they really view Hamas − and what they reveal about living under the U.S. and European Union-designated terror group in the Gaza Strip.


68% − believed that they had no way to safely participate in peaceful protests against Hamas' rule.

"Basically (most Gazans) just want to be able to do their job and have enough money to spend time with their family,"

"Nobody in Gaza is thinking about Hamas. They are busy surviving," this Palestinian said.

"The most important thing now is not Hamas. It's that Israel stops killing us," said another.

Before the war, Israeli media published stories of Gazans who had fled the enclave because of threats they faced from Hamas for participating in protests, because they didn't support its approach to Israel or for challenging the way it spent financing from Qatar on rockets and tunnels rather than schools or other infrastructure.

"After Oct. 7 we all in Gaza have been (accused of being) Hamas supporters. In fact, I am not. And I will never be," said Tareq Hajjaj, a Gazan journalist, in rare public comments about Hamas.

Hajjaj said he knows many Gazans with strong feelings about Hamas who won't speak publicly about it.


 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: wing2000
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
41,502
44,624
Los Angeles Area
✟994,546.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
And are also claiming that Palestine be investigated for war crimes as well?
Are you asking me if I think they should be? Certainly what we saw in the initial terror attack was criminal on the face of it. Hamas, Islamic Jihad and any other terror groups or 'unaffiliated Palestinians' who took part in them should be held to account.
 
Upvote 0

truthpls

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2023
2,615
556
victoria
✟76,641.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
They had 17 years to do that. Too late for them now. You reap what you sow.
Maybe most of them figured Israel was not a friend or trustworthy and wanted local people to assume any positions available? Let's face it, being occupied and imprisoned and mistreated leads to resentment. Having an election (what was the turn out?) 17 long years ago does not mean they wanted their leaders to kill Israeli children does it?
As I pointed out......the result of electing a terrorist organization to run your govt. How'd that work out for them? Not too well it seems.
Set them free and return lands taken long ago, and share the land. Maybe that would help. Bombing their children like terrorists only puts Israel in checkmate
 
Upvote 0

Vanellus

Newbie
Sep 15, 2014
1,652
598
✟151,500.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Israel’s Cabinet on Wednesday approved a cease-fire deal with the Hamas militant group that would bring a temporary halt to a devastating war that has stretched on for over six weeks and release dozens of hostages being held in the Gaza Strip in exchange for Palestinians in Israeli prisons.

Under the deal, Hamas is to free 50 of the roughly 240 hostages it is holding in the Gaza Strip over a four-day period, the Israeli government said Wednesday. It said it would extend the lull by an additional day for every 10 hostages released.

The government said the first hostages to be released would be women and children.

Ahead of Wednesday morning’s Cabinet vote, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel would resume its offensive against Hamas after the cease-fire expires.

It was not immediately clear when the truce would go into effect.

I came across this news article from 2006 and the idea of hudna. The idea being of a long term ceasefire between Hamas and Israel rather than Hamas recognising Israel in the short term.

"we're offering a hudna [ceasefire] for 10 years in return for the end of occupation. ... We hope the Europeans will become aware of the concept of hudna, and that it can become a substitute for recognition of Israel" ... The Quartet - the US, EU, UN and Russia - have demanded that Hamas formally recognise Israel, renounce violence, and accept previous agreements between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organisation, before the Quartet lifts the economic embargo on the West Bank and Gaza imposed after Hamas won elections in January.
Mr Yousef said that there was no support in Gaza and the West Bank for recognition of Israel, and he could not propose such a change at present.
"If I did, I would end up like Michael Collins," he said, referring to the Irish republican leader assassinated in 1922 for accepting an Irish two-state solution.

"We need to change people's minds on how they look at the conflict, and it will take time. The climate will change if we have a period of peace."

Mr Yousef and Said Abu Musameh, a former Hamas leader and now a member of the Palestinian national assembly, said the ceasefire proposal, first put forward a decade ago by the late Hamas leader, Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, would be a de facto recognition of Israel. A period of peace could create the environment for later negotiations on a full Middle East peace deal.
Now, of course, some may say you can't trust Hamas etc. but it can also be said you can't trust Israel. I was watching a BBC documentary about the Six Day War and before Israel attacked the Golan Heights the Israeli PM Eshkol had said Israel had no further territorial ambitions (who else said that?!). Then Israel attacked the Golan Heights after obtaining assurances that the USSR would likely not intervene.

I was also struck by how this article actually names important Hamas people rather than regarding Hamas as some kind of evil blob. The example of Michael Collins is interesting as it raises the idea that there are factions within Hamas which possibility seems to be little discussed.

Hamas touts 10-year ceasefire to break deadlock over Israel

This video by Norman Finkelstein gives some good background to the conflict.

 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
22,146
13,665
Earth
✟235,261.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
Well let's hope when this is over they get a new governing body and stop this "we need to attack Israel" nonsense. Focus on building your own country rather than trying to wreck someone else's.

I hope Israel has made it clear that any further aggressions will be dealt with severely.
Let’s make guesses about how the postbellum situation will go, I’ll start.

1. Israel is victorious! Installs an “approved” new Civil Authority over the Gaza region
2. The Gazans are leery about this new organization which begins to have troubles right off of the bat with the people that it is supposed to govern
3. Israel dumps tons of money into Gaza to make life better for Gazans
4. Israeli hardliners balk at the sums being spent on their [former] enemies
5. Such spending is “suspended” (or otherwise cut dramatically)
6. The new civil authority begins to crack down on dissidents who had been promised money to rebuild their land but the blockade of the past continues and funds from Israel have fallen
7. A new “Hamas” emerges from Gaza


This could take from 3-10 years.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Vanellus

Newbie
Sep 15, 2014
1,652
598
✟151,500.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Let’s make guesses about how the postbellum situation will go, I’ll start.
1. Israel is victorious! Installs an “approved” new Civil Authority over the Gaza region
2. The Gazans are leery about this new organization which begins to have troubles right off of the bat with the people that it is supposed to govern
3. Israel dumps tons of money into Gaza to make life better for Gazans
4. Israeli hardliners balk at the sums being spent on their [former] enemies
5. Such spending is “suspended” (or otherwise cut dramatically)
6. The new civil authority begins to crack down on dissidents who had been promised money to rebuild their land but the blockade of the past continues and funds from Israel have fallen
7. A new “Hamas” emerges from Gaza


This could take from 3-10 years.
I've been trying to figure out what's in it for Hamas with this truce deal. Assuming the Hamas doesn't care about the people of Gaza narrative and Netanyahu will want to resume the extreme violence so as to "destroy Hamas" and really to cling on to power as long as possible, what's in it for Hamas? Ha so they can rearm (over such a small number of days?). No one seems to remark that Israel has been doing a lot of rearming as well and swelling the coffers of US arms manufacturers in the process.
 
Upvote 0

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
24,630
20,799
✟1,717,773.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I've been trying to figure out what's in it for Hamas with this truce deal. Assuming the Hamas doesn't care about the people of Gaza narrative and Netanyahu will want to resume the extreme violence so as to "destroy Hamas" and really to cling on to power as long as possible, what's in it for Hamas? Ha so they can rearm (over such a small number of days?). No one seems to remark that Israel has been doing a lot of rearming as well and swelling the coffers of US arms manufacturers in the process.

What's in it for Hamas? Good PR.
And tactically, a cease fire may allow them to reposition their forces.
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
11,915
5,650
Minnesota
✟312,316.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
I've been trying to figure out what's in it for Hamas with this truce deal. Assuming the Hamas doesn't care about the people of Gaza narrative and Netanyahu will want to resume the extreme violence so as to "destroy Hamas" and really to cling on to power as long as possible, what's in it for Hamas? Ha so they can rearm (over such a small number of days?). No one seems to remark that Israel has been doing a lot of rearming as well and swelling the coffers of US arms manufacturers in the process.
It's hardly a narrative, Hamas has shown they will murder those in Gaza to achieve their goal. Iran runs the overall terrorist operations and we can only speculate, but it seems to me that the longer they can tie up Israeli forces and prolong their propaganda the better for the terrorists. The hostage taking allows opportunities for Hamas to regroup and get re-supplied and last longer. They will release the hostages in small groups. Propaganda-wise, with the help of those on the left around they world, they have more of an opportunity to actually get a cease fire so they can again launch a major attack.
 
Upvote 0

Vanellus

Newbie
Sep 15, 2014
1,652
598
✟151,500.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
What's in it for Hamas? Good PR.
And tactically, a cease fire may allow them to reposition their forces.
I believe return to N Gaza of anyone will not be allowed during the pause. Also, given that Hamas will be destroyed (according to Netanyahu) good PR can only provide a nice headstone.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
22,906
15,539
72
Bondi
✟365,364.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
As previously posted, given that Israel is prosecuting a just war against an unjust aggressor, Option 1 following ius in bello principles. Can you cite a war that did not incur "death and destruction"? I think not. Can you cite a war that did not cause one innocent person's death? I think not.
I can think of very many wars that were conducted in a way that caused unnecessary death and suffering. In fact, I'm struggling to think of one in my lifetime that didn't (Falklands War?). Quite possibly anything 19th century and previously when it was simply one army v another army. So it's a very naive position to take to shrug one's shoulders and say - hey, this is an unfortunate and unavoidable result of armed conflict. Abject nonsense.

And most definitely I want to protest that the number of innocent civilian deaths can be too high. If you don't think that the deaths 4,000 children is too high in this conflict then I'm at a loss to continue. I'll just note that you don't consider it too high.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Carl Emerson

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2017
15,490
10,378
79
Auckland
✟435,212.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I can think of very many wars that were conducted in a way that caused unnecessary death and suffering. In fact, I'm struggling to think of one in my lifetime that didn't (Falklands War?). Quite possibly anything 19th century and previously when it was simply one army v another army. So it's a very naive position to take to shrug one's shoulders and say - hey, this is an unfortunate and unavoidable result of armed conflict. Abject nonsense.

And most definitely I want to protest that the number of innocent civilian deaths can be too high. If you don't think that the deaths 4,000 children is too high in this conflict then I'm at a loss to continue. I'll just note that you don't consider it too high.

So what is the solution if Hamas doesn't have regard for life?
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
22,906
15,539
72
Bondi
✟365,364.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
So what is the solution if Hamas doesn't have regard for life?
According to a lot of people on this forum it's to bomb the place back to the Stone Age and don't consider the consequences. A cease fire would be a good idea.

Oh look. They're just about to start one.

Now, apart from ideas about what should be done from this point onwards which have already been presented, do you have any solutions? Or do you just want to carry on exactly as has been done up to now?
 
Upvote 0

Carl Emerson

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2017
15,490
10,378
79
Auckland
✟435,212.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
According to a lot of people on this forum it's to bomb the place back to the Stone Age and don't consider the consequences. A cease fire would be a good idea.

Oh look. They're just about to start one.

Now, apart from ideas about what should be done from this point onwards which have already been presented, do you have any solutions? Or do you just want to carry on exactly as has been done up to now?

Given that Hamas like Fatah draw support from the Neo-Nazi quarter philosophically there is little hope - unless deprogramming is forced on them as it was forced on the Hitler Youth after WW2 (by the church with some success)
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
22,906
15,539
72
Bondi
✟365,364.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Given that Hamas like Fatah draw support from the Neo-Nazi quarter philosophically there is little hope - unless deprogramming is forced on them as it was forced on the Hitler Youth after WW2 (by the church with some success)
And that's your answer? 'Forced deprograming Hamas won't work, so carry on'.

Didn't I ask you which organisation you would trust to give a reasonable accurate death toll? Still waiting on that.
 
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,848
7,588
✟750,743.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
I mentioned earlier in the thread how Hamas gained control of Gaza.
And you remember the election that handed hamas control. Yeah, great idea; putting terrorists in charge of the govt......with access to all the money, food and supplies that goes along with it.....you know, the tens (hundreds?) of billions in aid they have been receiving all these years?
For one, Palestinians in Gaza live in an environment where turning against Hamas could pose significant risks to their lives, livelihoods, and families. They allow Hamas to operate in Gaza mostly because they are afraid that if they refuse, they will be its next victims.
And what? Supporting them won't do the same thing?......while still leaving them in charge? Look at what is happening to them now. Unless they are a very stupid people they know how to ask for help in getting rid of hamas (they have had plenty of practice asking for aid).
I can guarantee you that if Hamas is ever eliminated in Gaza, the Palestinians will be celebrating in the streets."
Like they were celebrating in the streets on Oct 7th after getting word about the massacre? Though I have to admit, they weren't celebrating a few days later....

If you need more contraindications there are 100's-1000's of these on youtube.

I'll stop here; I think I made my point.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: rjs330
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,848
7,588
✟750,743.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
Maybe most of them figured Israel was not a friend or trustworthy
And what? Israel is the only country that want hamas gone? Even some Arab countries want them gone. (read: eliminated)
 
Upvote 0