Maybe people today would be completely freaked out if they suddenly saw a clinically-dead person rise to life or to see massive tumors vanish before their eyes.
Churches didn't do themselves any favor in this regard as some 'churches' would falsify miracle healing or have people drop to the ground and roll around out of control and call it something like 'in the spirit'...or something. It was just put on as a 'show'..and no actual miracle took place.
This is my theory as to why miracle healings aren't really shown in church..it's because of past show-boating and fake healings.
Thomas was told he was blessed (they.... actually, not he) for believing what they have seen and witnessed, but the blessing would be greater for those who didn't see and still believed.
My question is, after recording the stories as proof, why would he deliberately short your blessing by showing you miracles again?
Also, what was the purpose of miracles? People present TONGUES like it makes them more holy, or closer to God... they claim healing as if it makes them more or better, or something special.....
Miracles were given to prophets to prove they were from God, and their message was holy. They weren't given to people casually.
As Christ said to the pharisees, at least believe in the miracles.... Moses had the magic stick, Gideon the kazoos and crock pots of smiting, etc...Christ had miracles to prove He was the messiah.
The apostles had miracles to prove that they were legit.
But Paul told Tim to remember the things he heard Paul teach (not just the letters) and to pass them on. The passer-onners, were to guarantee the message.
With the message guaranteed now, those gifts would now just be excess.
And, why take away your blessing and giving you miracles? It's totally backwards thinking and in contradiction to all that God did.
my thoughts are free and worth 2x that.