Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Too bad we can't say that about the posts they reside in.2 TIMOTHY 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness
Too bad we can't say that about the posts they reside in.
Once again, you seem to be claiming that your posts (not just the scriptures in them) are somehow inspired.Why not if it is God's WORD rightly divided then we should BELIEVE and FOLLOW it over the teachings and traditions of men that break the commandments of God. Sin (breaking God's commandments) will keep all those who knowingly practice it out of God's Kingdom.
Once again, you seem to be claiming that your posts (not just the scriptures in them) are somehow inspired.
Over the course of the bible there are various covenant relationships that have their own make up of laws. Edenic covenant, Adamic covenant, Noahic covenant, Abrahamic covenant etc... all are "God's law" but although there may be overlap or similarities they are specific to a context. Just because Noah was told that "Everything that lives and moves about will be food for you." doesn't mean this is the same for the Mosaic covenant which had very different dietary laws. Both are God's law and both are foreshadows to something greater and to the same end but they are different and are not transferable. Or are you saying that which Adam and Noah were told are not God's law?Christ law is God's Law, Christ is God and the laws of the father are the laws of Christ. Are you saying that the laws of the father are different to the laws of Christ?
Over the course of the bible there are various covenant relationships that have their own make up of laws. Edenic covenant, Adamic covenant, Noahic covenant, Abrahamic covenant etc... all are "God's law" but although there may be overlap or similarities they are specific to a context. Just because Noah was told that "Everything that lives and moves about will be food for you." doesn't mean this is the same for the Mosaic covenant which had very different dietary laws. Both are God's law and both are foreshadows to something greater and to the same end but they are different and are not transferable. Or are you saying that which Adam and Noah were told are not God's law?
We are not under the Mosaic covenant nor are we judged by the Mosaic law, just like we are not judged by the Edenic law to not eat of the tree in the middle of the garden, not because this law is misguided but because it doesn't apply to us. Christ's law is not the Mosaic law and is not the 10 commandments but it's still God's law, it's just happens to be God's law for us now. There's going to be similarities of course because they all point to the same things but God is the giver of the law and he determines what is revealed to us and what is not. Today we follow that which has been revealed to us not that which was revealed long ago to a different context.
the entire law points to something greater and by definition this makes them all shadows. the 4th commandment is a prime example. the commandment itself was foreshadowed at creation and Christ shows us it's deeper meaning, which one is God's proper law? Of course they all are God's law but they are revealed different ways for different times yet they all point to the same rest of God. Scripture does not show Noah or Abraham observing the Sabbath yet it is clear God's Sabbath predated them so was it less important then?What is the MOSAIC COVENANT in your view that we are not under and what are the SHADOW laws in the OLD COVENANT that point to the new? If we do not know what the OLD COVENANT is how can we understand what the NEW is?
the entire law points to something greater and by definition this makes them all shadows. the 4th commandment is a prime example. the commandment itself was foreshadowed at creation and Christ shows us it's deeper meaning, which one is God's proper law? Of course they all are God's law but they are revealed different ways for different times yet they all point to the same rest of God. Scripture does not show Noah or Abraham observing the Sabbath yet it is clear God's Sabbath predated them so was it less important then?
The Mosaic law was given in darkness without people knowing what they pointed to, today they are revealed and we cannot look back at them as if blind when they are in full light. God's rest has not changed and it was the same for Adam and Moses as it is for us yet God's has contextualised his law so that we may obtain his rest.
The rest of God is central to everything, it is at the core of it all and even is within the big 10. It helps to reveal it all as well as it is undeniably since the beginning right until the end and through it all, revealed differently yet always the same rest. How does this not show us that if it's for the 4th then it must be for all of them?
Let me rephrase to answer your questions directly. The mosaic covenant is the covenant given to Moses for Israel, we are not under any of its laws because we are not Israel 3000 years ago. They are all shadow laws and they all point to something greater. The bible shows us the complete covenants through out the ages but if all we had was the NT it would be enough to know and understand the new covenant. The early gentile Church operated with a lot less with poor knowledge of the OT simply because it was not available and they did not have cradle knowledge of the OT as Jewish believers would have. The OC points to the NC but the NC is complete so although helpful you don't have to know the OC to know the NC.Hello Damian, thanks for your post and appreciated your time in putting it together but none of it answered the question that was asked of you.
What is the MOSAIC COVENANT in your view that we are not under and what are the SHADOW laws in the OLD COVENANT that point to the new? If we do not know what the OLD COVENANT is how can we understand what the NEW is?
Let me rephrase to answer your questions directly. The mosaic covenant is the covenant given to Moses for Israel, we are not under any of its laws because we are not Israel 3000 years ago. They are all shadow laws and they all point to something greater. The bible shows us the complete covenants through out the ages but if all we had was the NT it would be enough to know and understand the new covenant. The early gentile Church operated with a lot less with poor knowledge of the OT simply because it was not available and they did not have cradle knowledge of the OT as Jewish believers would have. The OC points to the NC but the NC is complete so although helpful you don't have to know the OC to know the NC.
1. What makes up the MOSAIC COVENANT in your view?
2.What are the shadow laws in the MOSAIC Covenant in your view?
It feels like you're trying to trap me in some semantics. If you understand what I'm saying then what more do you want?I understand what you are trying to say here...
That which was ushered through Moses by God to Israel.
All of them
It feels like you're trying to trap me in some semantics. If you understand what I'm saying then what more do you want?
It feels like a trap because I have answered the questions yet you refuse to acknowledge that I have. It feels like you're agenda driven here and will continue to refuse any answer until you can agree with it or someone asks you to tell them the answer. If you disagree then fine but don't pretend I didn't even answer them.Hi Damian, There is no trick questions I do not know why you would think there is. If you did not wish to answer the questions just say so. I am happy to answer them for you if you cannot.
It feels like a trap because I have answered the questions yet you refuse to acknowledge that I have. It feels like you're agenda driven here and will continue to refuse any answer until you can agree with it or someone asks you to tell them the answer. If you disagree then fine but don't pretend I didn't even answer them.
I did answer the questions, as I have already repeated. Is there something you don't recognize as an answer or are you confused with? I invite you to read them over again at post #1171 however I can't help it if you don't like my answers. What is this like the 4th or 5th post where you keep saying I haven't answer the questions? You would do better to engage my response rather than keep on repeating that I didn't answer them. I'm afraid I can no longer tell you that I have answered the question so either choose to engage with me or this will be the last time I repeat myself. Please do not misunderstand my tone, but there comes a point where this type of stagnant back and forth is fruitless and either needs to progress or end.You have not answered the questions I asked
Is it SIN to break any of the 10 COMMANDMENTS that were written and spoken by GOD?May God bless you all as you seek him through his WORD
But who decides if it is a sin? Can I decide something isn't a sin based on my own ignorance? I've never felt any guilt about not observing the Sabbath.
Let me rephrase to answer your questions directly. The mosaic covenant is the covenant given to Moses for Israel, we are not under any of its laws because we are not Israel 3000 years ago. They are all shadow laws and they all point to something greater. The bible shows us the complete covenants through out the ages but if all we had was the NT it would be enough to know and understand the new covenant. The early gentile Church operated with a lot less with poor knowledge of the OT simply because it was not available and they did not have cradle knowledge of the OT as Jewish believers would have. The OC points to the NC but the NC is complete so although helpful you don't have to know the OC to know the NC.
I did answer the questions, as I have already repeated. Is there something you don't recognize as an answer or are you confused with? I invite you to read them over again at post #1171 however I can't help it if you don't like my answers. What is this like the 4th or 5th post where you keep saying I haven't answer the questions? You would do better to engage my response rather than keep on repeating that I didn't answer them. I'm afraid I can no longer tell you that I have answered the question so either choose to engage with me or this will be the last time I repeat myself. Please do not misunderstand my tone, but there comes a point where this type of stagnant back and forth is fruitless and either needs to progress or end.
as per my previous post, I will be stepping out of this conversation (once you break a 1000 replies I doubt anything can be added anyways), I wish the best to you.no you did not answer the questions I was asking.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?