• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Is Galatians 4 talking about the Sabbath?

T

TrustAndObey

Guest
In my brief stint in General Theology this week I had some people tell me that Galatians 4:9-11 is specifically referring to the Sabbath.

Galatians 4:9 - But now, after that ye have known God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage? 10 Ye observe days, and months, and times, and years. 11 I am afraid of you, lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain.

Those who say this passage is referring to the seventh day Sabbath are confining the Creator God to bondage! The seventh day Sabbath was instituted at creation (Genesis 2:1-3). This occurred before the entrance of sin and some 2500 years prior to the giving of the ceremonial laws at Mt. Sinai.

If observance of the seventh day Sabbath subjects a man to bondage, wouldn't that mean that the Creator Himself entered into bondage when He observed the world's first Sabbath?

Which leads to the question...if Adam and Eve hadn't sinned, would there still have been a Sabbath?
 
T

TrustAndObey

Guest
Homework? Tall, you make me tired. I've already pretty much signed up for art courses, now I gotta be a theologian?

Do you know what time it is?

Here's a clue that Galatians is talking about ceremonial law and not God's Ten Commandments:

Galatians 3:13 - Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree

Where is that written?

Deuteronomy 21:23 - His body shall not remain all night upon the tree, but thou shalt in any wise bury him that day; (for he that is hanged is accursed of God) that thy land be not defiled, which the LORD thy God giveth thee for an inheritance.

It's not written on stone, that's for sure!
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,690
6,107
Visit site
✟1,048,904.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yeah, I have to get to bed soon too. However, let's not rush to conclusions. Jesus took on our curse...ie he paid the price for our sin. That is talking about the curse on us from the breaking of ALL the law.

The curse of the law is that we have broken it. We are condemned by it. But I don't want to get ahead of myself. I am writing a commentary afterall!
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,690
6,107
Visit site
✟1,048,904.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
A Really Informal Commentary on Galatians (or at least as much of it as I get to) for the purpose of helping myself decide what law is being talked about.

GAL 1:1 Paul, an apostle--sent not from men nor by man, but by Jesus Christ and God the Father, who raised him from the dead-- 2 and all the brothers with me,

To the churches in Galatia:

GAL 1:3 Grace and peace to you from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ, 4 who gave himself for our sins to rescue us from the present evil age, according to the will of our God and Father, 5 to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.





a. Paul at the outset feels a need to defend himself as an apostle. The false teachers have not only led people astray but have eroded the standing he once had with them, to the degree that he now is doubted to be sent of God. This becomes a major theme in the book.

b. Paul also feels it necessary to add "and all the brothers with me", another element to establish his authority.

c. Paul gives his customary greeting. However, he skips his usual blessing/prayer which usually introduces various elements of thought that he plans to outline in the letter. Here the situation is so dire that he jumps right to the point.

The usual epistle format for Paul is

a. introduction of His name, and a brief salutation.

b. a fairly extended blessing.

c. Theological content/conflict resolution

d. practical lessons on living

e. greetings/farewell

Here Paul dispenses with the pleasantries.


GAL 1:6 I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting the one who called you by the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel-- 7 which is really no gospel at all. Evidently some people are throwing you into confusion and are trying to pervert the gospel of Christ. 8 But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let him be eternally condemned! 9 As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let him be eternally condemned!


a. A strong statement of the need for fidelity to the gospel. As it turns out he is condemning the Judaizers who have made salvation by works.

b. Paul often builds up to a confrontation with false teachers. But apparently he is going for broke here realizing the situation is dire.


GAL 1:10 Am I now trying to win the approval of men, or of God? Or am I trying to please men? If I were still trying to please men, I would not be a servant of Christ.

GAL 1:11 I want you to know, brothers, that the gospel I preached is not something that man made up. 12 I did not receive it from any man, nor was I taught it; rather, I received it by revelation from Jesus Christ.



a. Paul begins a defense of his credentials. He notes that the false teachers are playing to the pride of the Galatians. They are looking for recognition from men. But Paul is not content to flatter them. He is condemning the teachers outright. This is a mark of his apostolic calling. He also hints that at one time he was in the business of political flattery, but no longer.

b. The requirements for an apostle were clearly spelled out in the selection of Matthias.


AC 1:21 Therefore it is necessary to choose one of the men who have been with us the whole time the Lord Jesus went in and out among us, 22 beginning from John's baptism to the time when Jesus was taken up from us. For one of these must become a witness with us of his resurrection."

In order for Paul to claim apostleship he had to have met the resurrected Jesus. Since he was a newcomer to the faith this happened by revelation. Paul calls himself and apostle "abnormally born"


1CO 15:3 For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, 4 that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, 5 and that he appeared to Peter, and then to the Twelve. 6 After that, he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers at the same time, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep. 7 Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles, 8 and last of all he appeared to me also, as to one abnormally born.

1CO 15:9 For I am the least of the apostles and do not even deserve to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God. 10 But by the grace of God I am what I am, and his grace to me was not without effect. No, I worked harder than all of them--yet not I, but the grace of God that was with me. 11 Whether, then, it was I or they, this is what we preach, and this is what you believed.


c. Paul is now going to recount the history of his conversion and early years of faith for the express purpose of showing that he did not get his gospel from any of the other established apostles, but from Jesus.
 
Upvote 0
T

TrustAndObey

Guest
Okay, you win. You get the "Longest Title of a Document or Book Written By a Young Christian Person Seeking to Inform Others of Truth" award!!!

bravo.gif
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,690
6,107
Visit site
✟1,048,904.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

GAL 1:13 For you have heard of my previous way of life in Judaism, how intensely I persecuted the church of God and tried to destroy it. 14 I was advancing in Judaism beyond many Jews of my own age and was extremely zealous for the traditions of my fathers. 15 But when God, who set me apart from birth and called me by his grace, was pleased 16 to reveal his Son in me so that I might preach him among the Gentiles, I did not consult any man, 17 nor did I go up to Jerusalem to see those who were apostles before I was, but I went immediately into Arabia and later returned to Damascus.


a. Paul is recalling this information not just to prove a point, but to remind them of the time he spent with them, and they joy they had at his message. He is reminding them of the conviction they felt of the truth, and how they received the Spirit. His own testimony must have been very moving to them at the time, as it was clear to all that he was suffering greatly for his newfound faith and had left a promising career in Judaism in order to preach, making tents to pay for his costs.

b. some see in Paul's life the idea that he was a part of the Sanhedrin. Because of this some speculate that Paul was once married, and divorced, as marriage was a requirement, according to the historical understanding of some. However, Paul is careful to note here that while he was moving up in the ranks, he was still only beyond many his own age. He was not the one who commissioned papers to persecute, but the one to receive them, and the one to hold the coats of the people who stoned Stephen. Since he studied under Gamaliel and showed great promise his conversion would be giving up a big future.

c. Paul insists that while he is an apostle abnormally born this was not a new plan to God. God set him apart from birth. Paul had many unique attributes that readied him for his mission as apostle to the gentiles.

1. He was learned in Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic.
2. He was, unlike most of the Jews, a Roman citizen, having grown up in Cilicia.
3. He had training not only in the pharisaical schools but also at least some training in Greek literature as he shows in his quoting the Greek poets in Athens (Acts 17).


The times were also perfect for the spread of the gospel.
1. The Roman peace was going strong and civil authorities often were seen to protect Paul during his ministry.
2. The road system and widespread adoption of the Greek language throughout the eastern empire made travel and communication among foreign peoples far easier.

So Paul saw all of this as no coincidence. And his life work was a tremendous calling. He well remembered God telling him He had made him his chosen instrument to take the gospel to the gentiles and would show him how much he would suffer for His name.

d. Again Paul emphasizes that it was by grace in his own case that he was saved and called. Paul of all people, though having legalistic righteousness as a pharisee, was not worthy of the gospel of God having persecuted Jesus in the person of His people. So he of all people recognized that grace was the central message of the gospel.

e. Paul then gives an accounting of his whereabouts. This information in some ways is seen to conflict with that in Acts. But can be seen as simply adding to the account in there. The insertion of the time in Arabia is a new wrinkle. It is assumedly here that Paul learned the gospel by revelation that he preached in Damascus.

Here is the account in Acts:


Saul spent several days with the disciples in Damascus. 20 At once he began to preach in the synagogues that Jesus is the Son of God. 21 All those who heard him were astonished and asked, "Isn't he the man who raised havoc in Jerusalem among those who call on this name? And hasn't he come here to take them as prisoners to the chief priests?" 22 Yet Saul grew more and more powerful and baffled the Jews living in Damascus by proving that Jesus is the Christ. AC 9:23 After many days had gone by, the Jews conspired to kill him, 24 but Saul learned of their plan. Day and night they kept close watch on the city gates in order to kill him. 25 But his followers took him by night and lowered him in a basket through an opening in the wall.


In one account he is said to go immediately into Arabia, and in the other to preach immediately in Damascus, following a short time, numbered in days, that he spent with the disciples there. Both in fact could be true in one sense. He may have initially spent time with the disciples, testified for a short while of his conversion, then gone to Arabia, and then RETURNED as he says in the Galatians account, to Damascus. There he preached and "grew more and more powerful" until the conspiracy against him drove him from the city.


GAL 1:18 Then after three years, I went up to Jerusalem to get acquainted with Peter and stayed with him fifteen days. 19 I saw none of the other apostles--only James, the Lord's brother. 20 I assure you before God that what I am writing you is no lie. 21 Later I went to Syria and Cilicia. 22 I was personally unknown to the churches of Judea that are in Christ. 23 They only heard the report: "The man who formerly persecuted us is now preaching the faith he once tried to destroy." 24 And they praised God because of me.


a. Again we see the Acts account describing the same process.



AC 9:26 When he came to Jerusalem, he tried to join the disciples, but they were all afraid of him, not believing that he really was a disciple. 27 But Barnabas took him and brought him to the apostles. He told them how Saul on his journey had seen the Lord and that the Lord had spoken to him, and how in Damascus he had preached fearlessly in the name of Jesus. 28 So Saul stayed with them and moved about freely in Jerusalem, speaking boldly in the name of the Lord. 29 He talked and debated with the Grecian Jews, but they tried to kill him. 30 When the brothers learned of this, they took him down to Caesarea and sent him off to Tarsus.



b. Paul adds more detail in the Galatians account once again, stating that he did not see anyone there in Jerusalem except for Peter for a short time, and James . This is again to stress that his gospel was already intact, and they did not add to it. he also omits the reference to their doubting him at first. Not because his audience was not familiar with it ,but probably because he is trying not to detract from his apostolic calling.
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,690
6,107
Visit site
✟1,048,904.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

GAL 2:1 Fourteen years later I went up again to Jerusalem, this time with Barnabas. I took Titus along also. 2 I went in response to a revelation and set before them the gospel that I preach among the Gentiles. But I did this privately to those who seemed to be leaders, for fear that I was running or had run my race in vain. 3 Yet not even Titus, who was with me, was compelled to be circumcised, even though he was a Greek. 4 This matter arose because some false brothers had infiltrated our ranks to spy on the freedom we have in Christ Jesus and to make us slaves. 5 We did not give in to them for a moment, so that the truth of the gospel might remain with you.


A. This passage again brings up questions of timing. In fact, scholars debate the timing of the book itself. Was it before the Acts 15 council? Was it after? Was the rebuking of Peter after? Some assign it a pretty early date, one of the earliest in the canon. Others a late date.

Here is the account of the start of the Acts 15 council:


AC 15:1 Some men came down from Judea to Antioch and were teaching the brothers: "Unless you are circumcised, according to the custom taught by Moses, you cannot be saved." 2 This brought Paul and Barnabas into sharp dispute and debate with them. So Paul and Barnabas were appointed, along with some other believers, to go up to Jerusalem to see the apostles and elders about this question. 3 The church sent them on their way, and as they traveled through Phoenicia and Samaria, they told how the Gentiles had been converted. This news made all the brothers very glad. 4 When they came to Jerusalem, they were welcomed by the church and the apostles and elders, to whom they reported everything God had done through them.


In some respects the accounts are the same. In both cases there was an issue with false teachers who were emphasizing the law. But one seems to be in response to a vision about his gospel, and the other seems to be instigated by the church in Antioch.

In the council in Acts 15 the discussion was quite open, with more than just Paul and his fellow workers being there. In fact, the initial dispute led to a full meeting of elders and apostles. It seems a more universal gathering. But in the account in Galatians it was a private meeting where they endorsed Paul's work.

So it is unlikely they are the same meeting. One was about Paul's work, his mission. The other was about a church wide issue, and Paul's status there is not at all in question.

b. In fact, the events in Galatians 2:11 where Paul confronts Peter strongly suggest that Peter, though likely having already met Cornelius, etc. and was convinced that Gentiles could be Christians, had not yet come to terms with the full import of that message. It is likely this preceded the Acts 15 council. Moreover, Paul's comments here make no reference to an already established decision of the brothers regarding what is expected of Gentile believers. We would expect this to be mentioned if the council had already happened. Though there is some evidence that in the question of food sacrificed to idols Paul did not hold too firmly to the prohibition given at the council (See 1 Corinthians 8).

c. He downplayed the leaders in Jerusalem and their approval of his role. While they did approve it, it was in recognition of God's calling and work through him.

d.Paul uses hard terms for the false brothers who had "infiltrated their ranks" just as he now sees the Galatians as having been infiltrated and deceived. But he notes that he did not give in, not letting Titus be circumcised. He notes that the reason they did this was to protect the Galatian's freedom. To give in at that time would have meant that the whole Gentile church would have been placed under an obligation to the whole law.
 
Upvote 0