• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Is forced vaccination related to the mark of the beast?

The Righterzpen

Jesus is my Shield in any Desert or Storm
Feb 9, 2019
3,406
1,352
54
Western NY
Visit site
✟155,771.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
The online fake news group that published the fake Hunter Biden "Ukrainian secret deals"

Since when did the NY Post say anything about Covid 19 being a weaponized lab experiment? (You are aware they are the ones who published the Hunter emails; aren't you? But maybe not; seeing how you're the one who get Desert Storm mixed up with the post 9/11 War on Terror!)

https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/

Then we have this gem:

Opinion: Joe Biden Forced Ukraine to Fire Prosecutor for Aid Money

And this was the prosecutor appointed by the Ukrainian Prime Minister to investigate Hunter.

(Now waits to see how you will contradict statements that came out of Joe's own mouth...)
 
Upvote 0

eclipsenow

Scripture is God's word, Science is God's works
Dec 17, 2010
9,706
2,435
Sydney, Australia
Visit site
✟196,856.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Operation "Warp Speed": When did the CIA become involved in public health?
Operation Warp Speed - A Technocratic Chess Piece?
Honestly - I have to respond to this rubbish?
The mere fact of quoting this site makes you sound like a tinfoil teen.

A Thought Leader in Natural Health
Dr. Mercola has paved the way for revolutionary changes in the field of natural health. He is always ahead of the curve when it comes to innovative health information, breaking beyond the confines of conventional medicine to bring trustworthy health advice to his audiences. Here are some of the contributions he made to natural health:
Dr. Joseph Mercola’s Qualifications
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟916,165.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Honestly - I have to respond to this rubbish?
The mere fact of quoting this site makes you sound like a tinfoil teen.


Tinfoil has not been used, since Aluminum became widely available.

We now make our hats out of Aluminum foil.

It is no wonder you think it is "rubbish". You are about 100 years behind the curve.


.
 
Upvote 0

The Righterzpen

Jesus is my Shield in any Desert or Storm
Feb 9, 2019
3,406
1,352
54
Western NY
Visit site
✟155,771.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
Operation "Warp Speed": When did the CIA become involved in public health?

I'm in the process of watching this. I'll let you know what I think when I'm done.

And certainly there were plenty of experiments done on people (ranging from mental institutions, prison populations and military) going back to about WWII (and a bit prior) mostly due to the eugenics movement and the proliferation of pharmaceuticals.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: BABerean2
Upvote 0

eclipsenow

Scripture is God's word, Science is God's works
Dec 17, 2010
9,706
2,435
Sydney, Australia
Visit site
✟196,856.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Tinfoil has not been used, since Aluminum became widely available. We now make our hats out of Aluminum foil. It is no wonder you think it is "rubbish". You are about 100 years behind the curve.
Yeah nah - tinfoil hat is an expression dude.
It's called context - something that is helpful for comprehending the real world. :oldthumbsup: :doh:

The things working against that 'natural therapies' doctor and his dumb idea that the CIA are behind some awful totalitarian move from the 'guv-ern-myant!'

1. Anti-Science nutter:
I haven't bothered to read his site - but he's probably an anti-science anti-vaccer - and you want us to listen to him?

2. Temporary predictable emergency:
He's going on about dark forces of totalitarian control in a country that hasn't even BOTHERED to control this very real, very natural, very dangerous pandemic - so stop crying over spilt milk Mr Natural-pathic 'doctor' man - as your country is doomed to lose another 200k people anyway. In contrast our Australian State of Victoria had 750 cases per day. It was about to go exponential and FLOOD our health system so that you could die of other easily treatable emergencies simply because there were no beds free. What to do? Total lockdown, 5km travel limits, curfews, bars and clubs and restaurants closed, etc. For MONTHS! Now that's some 'totalitarian control'. Then what happened? We all got chipped and the mark of the beast? Nope. Sorry. Anti-climax - now Victoria's been Covid free for a week and they're opening up again. It's just an old fashioned pandemic. Just like we see the Apostle John describing in Revelation - pandemics and chaos interupting our lives again and again for the 2000 years of this 'gazillion years' (millennium) we're in until the Lord returns. Just a temporary health emergency policy. No permanent change to even the Australian democracy - and we went full lockdown!

3. All sorts of countries are using their military:
Oooh, scary! The CIA! This must be some dark covert thing. Except, nah. In a world of climate change and pandemics, we're going to need to draw on the resources of various government crisis think tanks and militaries. From Australian military aircraft that can suddenly double as water-bombers in our mega-fires to European armies being called up to run mass Covid testing clinics, our armies are the perfect stand-bye professional forces ready to build emergency tent-hospitals in Central Park through to running mass emergency REAL immunisation of a REAL vaccine when / if one emerges.

I think Christians should be on the side of science, and on the side of a vaccine. Until recently Christians have had a proud legacy in the sciences and in medicine. It's time to abandon the tinfoil hat conspiracy theory and start embracing the wonderful healing gifts God has granted us to find in vaccines and modern medicine.
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟916,165.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Robert Kennedy Jr. speaks about those who want to control the truth.




Rev_18:23 And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived.

.
 
Upvote 0

fwGod

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2005
1,404
530
✟72,762.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Is forced vaccination related to the mark of the beast?

Rev 13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
Rev 13:17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
Rev 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
Who is the "he" that will cause all to receive the mark of the beast? Where is that found in scripture? Is it written in the epistles that were written to the church for this time of the church age?

No the beast has his time during the seven year Tribulation as written in the book of Revelation that tells of future things to happen during that timeframe. It's not until the last half, 3.5yrs, that the Antichrist beast comes to power.

There can't be a mark without the beast.
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟916,165.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Who is the "he" that will cause all to receive the mark of the beast? Where is that found in scripture? Is it written in the epistles that were written to the church for this time of the church age?

No the beast has his time during the seven year Tribulation as written in the book of Revelation that tells of future things to happen during that timeframe. It's not until the last half, 3.5yrs, that the Antichrist beast comes to power.

There can't be a mark without the beast.

Multiple Second Coming Visions in Revelation:


Christ returns at the end of Revelation chapter 6, with signs in the sun, moon, and stars, as are found in the Olivet Discourse.
Those at the end of the chapter are hiding from the wrath of the Lamb.
Why would they be hiding if Christ is not present?
The "kings", "captains", "might men", "free", and "bond" are also found in chapter 19 at the return of Christ.


He returns at the 7th trumpet, which is the last trumpet in the Bible, and the time of the judgment of the dead in Revelation 11:15-18.


The beginning of chapter 12 is a history lesson containing the fall of Satan, and the birth and death of Christ, who is the seed promised to crush the head of Satan in Genesis 3:15.


The Second Coming is found in the "harvest" of chapter 14, which is related to the parable of the wheat and tares in Matthew chapter 13.


He comes as a thief at Armageddon, and we find the greatest earthquake in history in chapter 16. This occurs when the 7th angel pours out his vial. How powerful is an earthquake which moves islands and destroys the mountains? What is happening to the planet?


He comes on a horse in chapter 19.


He comes with the fire, and the judgment of the dead at the end of chapter 20, which agrees with what Paul said in 2 Thessalonians 1:7-10, and 2 Timothy 4:1.
(The time of the judgment of the dead is also found in Revelation 11:18.)
There are no mortals left alive on the planet at the end of Matthew 25:31-46.
Revelation 9:14 proves some of the angels have already been bound in some manner.
Because the two witnesses were bodily resurrected from the dead in Revelation 11, the "first resurrection" at the beginning of Revelation 20 is not the first bodily resurrection in the book.


The only way to properly interpret the book is through the principle of "Recapitulation".

.
 
Upvote 0

fwGod

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2005
1,404
530
✟72,762.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Multiple Second Coming Visions in Revelation:

Christ returns at the end of Revelation chapter 6, with signs in the sun, moon, and stars, as are found in the Olivet Discourse.
Those signs are not in the Olivet Discourse.

Jesus doesn't return at Revel.6, those signs are before He comes. Mat.24:29-30. Verse 30 corresponds with Revel.19:11, 15.

The men in the caves are referring to the wrath of the Lamb, not of the Second Coming of which Jesus comes to make war (Revel.19:11). In which those gathered at Har Megiddo., all die by the breath of His mouth.

Nothing like that is mentioned in Revel.6:14-17.

How would those unbelievers even know anything about Biblical theology in order to make such a statement? The wrath of the Lord. Why would they attribute it to Him? They had to have heard something. They had to have believed it on some level.

Instead of just yelling ohsh--!!!

It's my speculation that they would have tortured the saints to get the information and then martyr them.
Those at the end of the chapter are hiding from the wrath of the Lamb.
Why would they be hiding if Christ is not present?
The "kings", "captains", "might men", "free", and "bond" are also found in chapter 19 at the return of Christ.
When they are in a cave, how would they know that Jesus had arrived in His Second Coming? It doesn't say that the angels announced His arrival. It doesn't say that the angels trumpeted horns.

I submit that they were hiding in a cave because that's where all of their arsenal is hidden. It has happened before that certain Middle East armies who were in an underground catacomb blew themselves up because of casually tending to their weaponry.

Just to prove the point, recently there was the reported explosions due to chemicals stored in the same place as fireworks.

So it's possible that because those armies will be fighting against Jesus and His saints.. just like some Christians call calamity the punishment of God, they likely have that religious conclusion too.

But the incident at Har Megiddo is different enough that the two can't be smashed together into one event.
They aren't hiding when Jesus arrives in Revel.19:11. They are an army ready to unleash all of their military weapons on Him. You couldn't unleash weapons in a cave unless you wanted to get blown up.

Which is what's indicated in Rev.6:14 "The sky split apart like a scroll before it's rolled up." Watch a video of a nuclear bomb explosion and notice above the mushroom blast that occurs, the air, clouds, retreat to the sides as the mushroom cloud rises. Then also there can be seen jagged pillars of cloud as if hanging down from it and touching the ground.

There is .. the fire, the vapor or pillars of smoke. Joel 2:30.

Such a thing is accompanied by an earthquake Revel.6:12.
He returns at the 7th trumpet, which is the last trumpet in the Bible, and the time of the judgment of the dead in Revelation 11:15-18.
The angels in heaven were saying it. It wasn't because it had taken place yet.

At the time they did say it, it can be likened to when David told Goliath what was going to happen to him before David threw the stone.

Speaking of a thing to happen before it actually does happen. As God did when He created all things. He said it, and afterwards it was so. As Abraham spoke of having a son before he actually did. As Jesus spoke of the fig tree being dead before the roots died and the leaves withered.
The beginning of chapter 12 is a history lesson containing the fall of Satan
Fulfilled in Revel.12:7-9.
and the birth and death of Christ,
Biblewriter has an excellent teaching about this on his website.

None of what you posit is looking back then switching again to looking forward.

The things spoken of in from Revelation 6 onward only pertain to the future seven year Tribulation. Jesus wasn't born in what is to us the future, there's no mention of His death or resurrection in the text, nor will He be caught up to heaven at that time.

That "caught up" is certainly not needed because Jesus has been in heaven since He ascended ten days before Pentecost. And Jesus had brought John up into heaven in Revel.4 to witness events there such as Jesus being given the scroll.

To the Tribulation saints it makes no sense to be reminded of Jesus birth, death and resurrection. Because they've already heard that and got saved at some point before.. John had no reason to pause in revealing to the Tribulation saints of current events pertinent to them and suddenly give an evangelistic message.. then resume his telling them what will happen next in their current lives.

The current will be the notice of the Virgo constellation as described in Revel.12:1-2. It describes a woman close to time to give birth. The Jews will be familiar with that from Gen.37:9 which speaks of the descendants of Abraham.

So that identifies "the child" in verse 4. And corresponds with the 144,000 Jewish tribes Revel.7:4-8.

So the child spoken of is not Christ for it is said that Joseph, Mary and the Child Jesus fled to Egypt to avoid the killings of the babies and children by Hared.

However, Revel.12:5 says that when the child was caught up to God and to His throne, the woman (not Joseph, Mary and Jesus) fled to the wilderness. That corresponds to what Jesus told the Jews when they saw the Abomination of desolation. Flee to the wilderness. So the woman represents all of the Jews .. when the 144,000 are separated from the other Jews and sealed is not clearly indicated.

The phrase "caught up" is the same phrase found in 1Thes.4:17. But Jesus ascended up in the clouds. The action 'ascend' and 'caught up' is not the same.

So the going up is the same as the church going up to be at God's throne in heaven.
who is the seed promised to crush the head of Satan in Genesis 3:15.
That seed is also the church. Written in the epistles Rom.16:20. But promised also to the Tribulation saints. However, that promise doesn't prevent all of there deaths by martyrdom.

They overcame but they loved not their lives unto death. Revel.12:11.
The Second Coming is found in the "harvest" of chapter 14, which is related to the parable of the wheat and tares in Matthew chapter 13.
The tares do not get transformed into wheat. They are only gathered to be burned. They only die and their corpses lie on the ground. Mat.24:28.

It says nothing in Revel.14:6-7 of any souls that were saved or of wheat harvested. Using the scripture to try and directly imply it is assumption which is reading into the text what isn't there.

The Revelation was written according to themes therefore part of the 144,000 is mentioned in Chapter 7, then John returns to them in Chapter 14 to further describe them before they are "caught up" as stated in Chapter 12.

It corresponds to Jerem.51:6-8. Verse 8 says that the nations colluded with Babylon the Great in drinking the wine of the passion of her immorality.

The wine refers to the blood of the saints when they were martyred. Revel.17:2,6.
He comes as a thief at Armageddon
If He did then why would anyone be hiding? Why would any army be ready to shoot missiles and all they've got at Him?

A thief is a thief because he comes without anyone knowing. By the time it is known, it's too late.

Your statement indicates that you're not thinking of them as separate but smashing two separate events into one that aren't the same occasion. The post-Tribbers do the same thing. Putting the rapture at the same time as the Second Coming.
and we find the greatest earthquake in history in chapter 16. This occurs when the 7th angel pours out his vial. How powerful is an earthquake which moves islands and destroys the mountains? What is happening to the planet?
It doesn't happen to the entire planet. But only around Israel and the countries of the Mediterranean Sea. Including the islands located in the sea. The European area. The conglomerate nations are now called The European Union.

Babylon is not the whole earth. It's described as Sodom and Egypt. Metaphors to refer to profuse aberrant sexual practices and the government of Pharoah-Caesars ruling over slaves. But the further description is "Also where the Lord was crucified." That's Jerusalem Israel.
He comes on a horse in chapter 19.

He comes with the fire, and the judgment of the dead at the end of chapter 20, which agrees with what Paul said in 2 Thessalonians 1:7-10
Paul isn't talking about the judgement of the dead who're raised up to stand at the White Throne Judgement.

How can Jesus afflict someone who's already dead?

Paul could be talking about the reason why the men in the caves called their calamity "the wrath of the Lamb." Read 2 Thes. 2:6 again "After all, it is only just for God to repay with affliction those who afflict you" The further verses are referring to the Second Coming.
and 2 Timothy 4:1.
Is again referring to the Second Coming and that which follows it, the Messianic kingdom.
(The time of the judgment of the dead is also found in Revelation 11:18)
I agree with you on that one.
There are no mortals left alive on the planet at the end of Matthew 25:31-46.
Yes, there are.. the Jews who'd fled to the wilderness and there being protected by God, and also people out of all nations who are not in the European area.

Otherwise who would Jesus the Messiah reign over for the thousand years? Who would He teach the covenants of God? The church that returned with Him in the Second Coming already knows.
Who would the Jews survived in their flesh bodies teach the laws of God to as they are predestined and called to do?
Revelation 9:14 proves some of the angels have already been bound in some manner.
Do you notice that it's at the same geographical location of the European area?
If the entire planet is going to experience the disasters of the Tribulation, why not put the demons bound at places all over the world?
Because the two witnesses were bodily resurrected from the dead in Revelation 11, the "first resurrection" at the beginning of Revelation 20 is not the first bodily resurrection in the book.
The resurrection of Revel.20 is not including being raised from the dead as those whom Jesus raised from the dead.

The two witnesses were raised from the dead, then raptured up to heaven. That's different than those unsaved that were raised from the dead to go to the White Throne Judgement.

Did you notice that Chapter 12 speaks of the child being caught up to heaven? There is such closeness with the two witnesses in Chapt 11 raised from the dead.

I speculate that the apostle John put the two events so closely in chapter sequence so that readers can see the similarity between them.
Exactly as stated in 1 Thes.4:16-17.
I am not implying that it's referring to the rapture of the church age Christians. I am implying a repeat rapture event that occurs during the Tribulation as will occur to the church of this age before the Tribulation begins.
The only way to properly interpret the book is through the principle of "Recapitulation".
Exactly. But, it has to be known when and with what verses that it's biblically correct to recapitulate.
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟916,165.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Those signs are not in the Olivet Discourse.

Jesus doesn't return at Revel.6, those signs are before He comes. Mat.24:29-30. Verse 30 corresponds with Revel.19:11, 15.

The men in the caves are referring to the wrath of the Lamb, not of the Second Coming of which Jesus comes to make war (Revel.19:11). In which those gathered at Har Megiddo., all die by the breath of His mouth.

Nothing like that is mentioned in Revel.6:14-17.

How would those unbelievers even know anything about Biblical theology in order to make such a statement? The wrath of the Lord. Why would they attribute it to Him? They had to have heard something. They had to have believed it on some level.

Instead of just yelling ohsh--!!!

It's my speculation that they would have tortured the saints to get the information and then martyr them.
When they are in a cave, how would they know that Jesus had arrived in His Second Coming? It doesn't say that the angels announced His arrival. It doesn't say that the angels trumpeted horns.

I submit that they were hiding in a cave because that's where all of their arsenal is hidden. It has happened before that certain Middle East armies who were in an underground catacomb blew themselves up because of casually tending to their weaponry.

Just to prove the point, recently there was the reported explosions due to chemicals stored in the same place as fireworks.

So it's possible that because those armies will be fighting against Jesus and His saints.. just like some Christians call calamity the punishment of God, they likely have that religious conclusion too.

But the incident at Har Megiddo is different enough that the two can't be smashed together into one event.
They aren't hiding when Jesus arrives in Revel.19:11. They are an army ready to unleash all of their military weapons on Him. You couldn't unleash weapons in a cave unless you wanted to get blown up.

Which is what's indicated in Rev.6:14 "The sky split apart like a scroll before it's rolled up." Watch a video of a nuclear bomb explosion and notice above the mushroom blast that occurs, the air, clouds, retreat to the sides as the mushroom cloud rises. Then also there can be seen jagged pillars of cloud as if hanging down from it and touching the ground.

There is .. the fire, the vapor or pillars of smoke. Joel 2:30.

Such a thing is accompanied by an earthquake Revel.6:12.
The angels in heaven were saying it. It wasn't because it had taken place yet.

At the time they did say it, it can be likened to when David told Goliath what was going to happen to him before David threw the stone.

Speaking of a thing to happen before it actually does happen. As God did when He created all things. He said it, and afterwards it was so. As Abraham spoke of having a son before he actually did. As Jesus spoke of the fig tree being dead before the roots died and the leaves withered.
Fulfilled in Revel.12:7-9.
Biblewriter has an excellent teaching about this on his website.

None of what you posit is looking back then switching again to looking forward.

The things spoken of in from Revelation 6 onward only pertain to the future seven year Tribulation. Jesus wasn't born in what is to us the future, there's no mention of His death or resurrection in the text, nor will He be caught up to heaven at that time.

That "caught up" is certainly not needed because Jesus has been in heaven since He ascended ten days before Pentecost. And Jesus had brought John up into heaven in Revel.4 to witness events there such as Jesus being given the scroll.

To the Tribulation saints it makes no sense to be reminded of Jesus birth, death and resurrection. Because they've already heard that and got saved at some point before.. John had no reason to pause in revealing to the Tribulation saints of current events pertinent to them and suddenly give an evangelistic message.. then resume his telling them what will happen next in their current lives.

The current will be the notice of the Virgo constellation as described in Revel.12:1-2. It describes a woman close to time to give birth. The Jews will be familiar with that from Gen.37:9 which speaks of the descendants of Abraham.

So that identifies "the child" in verse 4. And corresponds with the 144,000 Jewish tribes Revel.7:4-8.

So the child spoken of is not Christ for it is said that Joseph, Mary and the Child Jesus fled to Egypt to avoid the killings of the babies and children by Hared.

However, Revel.12:5 says that when the child was caught up to God and to His throne, the woman (not Joseph, Mary and Jesus) fled to the wilderness. That corresponds to what Jesus told the Jews when they saw the Abomination of desolation. Flee to the wilderness. So the woman represents all of the Jews .. when the 144,000 are separated from the other Jews and sealed is not clearly indicated.

The phrase "caught up" is the same phrase found in 1Thes.4:17. But Jesus ascended up in the clouds. The action 'ascend' and 'caught up' is not the same.

So the going up is the same as the church going up to be at God's throne in heaven.
That seed is also the church. Written in the epistles Rom.16:20. But promised also to the Tribulation saints. However, that promise doesn't prevent all of there deaths by martyrdom.

They overcame but they loved not their lives unto death. Revel.12:11.
The tares do not get transformed into wheat. They are only gathered to be burned. They only die and their corpses lie on the ground. Mat.24:28.

It says nothing in Revel.14:6-7 of any souls that were saved or of wheat harvested. Using the scripture to try and directly imply it is assumption which is reading into the text what isn't there.

The Revelation was written according to themes therefore part of the 144,000 is mentioned in Chapter 7, then John returns to them in Chapter 14 to further describe them before they are "caught up" as stated in Chapter 12.

It corresponds to Jerem.51:6-8. Verse 8 says that the nations colluded with Babylon the Great in drinking the wine of the passion of her immorality.

The wine refers to the blood of the saints when they were martyred. Revel.17:2,6.
If He did then why would anyone be hiding? Why would any army be ready to shoot missiles and all they've got at Him?

A thief is a thief because he comes without anyone knowing. By the time it is known, it's too late.

Your statement indicates that you're not thinking of them as separate but smashing two separate events into one that aren't the same occasion. The post-Tribbers do the same thing. Putting the rapture at the same time as the Second Coming.
It doesn't happen to the entire planet. But only around Israel and the countries of the Mediterranean Sea. Including the islands located in the sea. The European area. The conglomerate nations are now called The European Union.

Babylon is not the whole earth. It's described as Sodom and Egypt. Metaphors to refer to profuse aberrant sexual practices and the government of Pharoah-Caesars ruling over slaves. But the further description is "Also where the Lord was crucified." That's Jerusalem Israel.
Paul isn't talking about the judgement of the dead who're raised up to stand at the White Throne Judgement.

How can Jesus afflict someone who's already dead?

Paul could be talking about the reason why the men in the caves called their calamity "the wrath of the Lamb." Read 2 Thes. 2:6 again "After all, it is only just for God to repay with affliction those who afflict you" The further verses are referring to the Second Coming.
Is again referring to the Second Coming and that which follows it, the Messianic kingdom.
I agree with you on that one.
Yes, there are.. the Jews who'd fled to the wilderness and there being protected by God, and also people out of all nations who are not in the European area.

Otherwise who would Jesus the Messiah reign over for the thousand years? Who would He teach the covenants of God? The church that returned with Him in the Second Coming already knows.
Who would the Jews survived in their flesh bodies teach the laws of God to as they are predestined and called to do?
Do you notice that it's at the same geographical location of the European area?
If the entire planet is going to experience the disasters of the Tribulation, why not put the demons bound at places all over the world?
The resurrection of Revel.20 is not including being raised from the dead as those whom Jesus raised from the dead.

The two witnesses were raised from the dead, then raptured up to heaven. That's different than those unsaved that were raised from the dead to go to the White Throne Judgement.

Did you notice that Chapter 12 speaks of the child being caught up to heaven? There is such closeness with the two witnesses in Chapt 11 raised from the dead.

I speculate that the apostle John put the two events so closely in chapter sequence so that readers can see the similarity between them.
Exactly as stated in 1 Thes.4:16-17.
I am not implying that it's referring to the rapture of the church age Christians. I am implying a repeat rapture event that occurs during the Tribulation as will occur to the church of this age before the Tribulation begins.
Exactly. But, it has to be known when and with what verses that it's biblically correct to recapitulate.


You are attempting to make the Two Peoples of God doctrine of modern Dispensational Theology work, which is a man-made doctrine less than 200 years old.

Because the New Covenant is "everlasting" in Hebrews 13:20, the "Church age" cannot end before the Second Coming of Christ.

The Capital "C" Church, as we use the word today, is not found in the entire Book of Revelation. Individual church bodies in ancient Asia Minor are found.


Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, modern Dispensational Theology falls apart, and the pretrib removal of the Church falls with it.

The New Covenant: Bob George

.
 
Upvote 0

fwGod

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2005
1,404
530
✟72,762.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
You are attempting to make the Two Peoples of God doctrine of modern Dispensational Theology work, which is a man-made doctrine less than 200 years old.
Incorrect. The idea that it's only 200 years old is a common mistake of Bible teachers to make a strawman out of it so they can knock it down and build up their own man made doctrine that allows for erroneous sequencing of end time prophecy events. And any number of other errors that I won't go into here.

But when the Bible is properly understood it's clear that the doctrine of dispensational theology was created by God to outline His plan. His plan of the ages is also punctuated by the Moeds which are fulfilled at times of God's choosing. Such as the Passover when the Jews were first introduced to the use of the blood of an animal that forgave their sins and also protected them from the angel of death.

The Biblical dispensation allows for consistently literal interpretation of scripture. And allows a proper view of Israel being separate from the church in God's will and plan.
Because the New Covenant is "everlasting" in Hebrews 13:20,
So is the Old Covenant everlasting. Genesis 17:7. In the interest of keeping this post short, I'll briefly give this one difference between them.. the source of the blood. The old covenant used the blood of animals to atone for sin, the new covenant used the blood of the Lamb of God to take away sins.
the "Church age" cannot end before the Second Coming of Christ.
You have used the word 'age' without recognizing that it indicates other ages before it, as well as other ages after it.

Innocence, conscience, law, then the church age of grace which is over when the Christians are raptured then begins the Tribulation age. After that the Messianic age.

The disciples understood the significance when they asked Jesus "What shall be the sign of your coming and the end of the age?"
The Capital "C" Church, as we use the word today, is not found in the entire Book of Revelation. Individual church bodies in ancient Asia Minor are found.
The word church is in the first chapters of Revelation when Jesus gives each of the seven a particular message. Then beginning with chapter four onward, there is only the word 'saints' used to refer to believers other than the Jews.

That also indicates that the Church is not present during the Tribulation and therefore the lawless one/Antichrist makes his arrival in Revel.6:2 onward.
Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, modern Dispensational Theology falls apart, and the pretrib removal of the Church falls with it.
Explain in detail using those verses how the preTrib would fall apart since in the pre-Trib doctrine the collection of verses you gave doesn't change the pre-Trib rapture teaching at all.

Here are a few things that the new covenant promise, that the old covenant promise didn't have.. a personal relationship with God. Being sons or daughters and not merely servants. Having the righteousness and holiness, the divine nature of God that transforms the old nature to the new nature in Christ Jesus, being able to come boldly to the throne of grace and not be burdened with perpetual sin but instead going from glory to glory by the Spirit of the Lord. Having a glorified body like Jesus has.., etc, etc.

I'll also point this out, the words 'old' and 'new covenant' that you used is another reference to the different ages or dispensations. Another case in which you use words without recognizing their significance.

Therefore the dispensational theology is firmly acknowledged, however such as yourself are blind to the meaning of the Biblical text.

The apostle Paul used his knowledge of ages to tell the believers at Corinth that the day of the Lord had not come as they'd been erroneously told.
He distinctly told them that the church age ended (when the restrainer is taken out of the way., also speaking of it in using the word depart(ure) as translated in all earlier Bibles except for the KJV and subsequent versions. (the reason why the word was changed from departure to apostasy is for another thread)
Paul clearly stated twice that the lawless one (the Antichrist) can not be revealed until after the church who restrains him from being revealed, is taken out of the way.
It corresponds with Revel.4:1 when the apostle John is called up into heaven. That corresponds with what Jesus said "I go to prepare a place for you, then I will return and receive you unto Myself." Corresponding with 1 thes.4:13-17.
And also corresponding with Isa.26:19-21. Which refers to being in heaven during the indignation (seven year tribulation) happening on the earth, then also speaks of Jesus returning to punish the inhabitants of the earth for their iniquity. Where the Revelation picks up that narrative with Jesus' Second Coming.

The apostle Paul further states that the catching away of the church is 'the blessed hope' to not be on the earth during the time of wrath (which occurs at varying times through the seven years Tribulation, as varying degrees of testings.. disasters, martyrs, etc).
And the words of Jesus to the apostle John in Revelation likewise says that the church of Philadelphia. The apostle John's first epistle emphasizes to the church of God's love to us and our love toward the brethren which identifies who the church of Philadelphia (of brotherly love) is.

Jesus spoke to that church saying, "Because of your perseverance, you will be kept from the time of testing (seven year Tribulation) which shall come upon the earth. They are given the door which no man can open or shut. Then in Revel.4:1 is the door opened in heaven and John is called up to heaven.. Bible teachers equate that with the entire Church being raptured before the Tribulation begins, which starts when Jesus opens the first seal in Revel.6:1.
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟916,165.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Incorrect. The idea that it's only 200 years old is a common mistake of Bible teachers to make a strawman out of it so they can knock it down and build up their own man made doctrine that allows for erroneous sequencing of end time prophecy events. And any number of other errors that I won't go into here.

But when the Bible is properly understood it's clear that the doctrine of dispensational theology was created by God to outline His plan.


The origin of your doctrine is found below in black and white within this video I produced for YouTube.

Genesis of Dispensational Theology


.
 
Upvote 0

fwGod

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2005
1,404
530
✟72,762.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The origin of your doctrine is found below in black and white within this video I produced for YouTube.

Genesis of Dispensational Theology
Apparently you think that I'm not aware of the various erroneous teachings out there? You think that I would be shocked by that video's teachings and thus back off my position?

You've got another think coming.

Whether you are amil or preterist.. there are plenty videos that debunk them. Would you like for me to post them here? Would you consider they are right and what you believe isn't?

I don't think you would, so why do you post yours to me?

That video is where you get your ineffectual information and unfounded reason to oppose the Dispensational Doctrine. The video is full of cherry picking and eisogesis just like you use. I have no idea why you'd think that I'd be impressed by it. Nor have I the slightest intention of accepting what is taught in it just because you do.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟916,165.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Apparently you think that I'm not aware of the various erroneous teachings out there? You think that I would be shocked by that video's teachings and thus back off my position?

You've got another think coming.

Whether you are amil or preterist.. there are plenty videos that debunk them. Would you like for me to post them here? Would you consider they are right and what you believe isn't?

I don't think you would, so why do you post yours to me?

That video is where you get your ineffectual information and unfounded reason to oppose the Dispensational Doctrine. The video is full of cherry picking and eisogesis just like you use. I have no idea why you'd think that I'd be impressed by it. Nor have I the slightest intention of accepting what is taught in it just because you do.


Maybe I would expect another Christian to accept the fact that they have been taught a doctrine which is less than 200 years old, because that is what happened to me.

I was once a deacon in a conservative Bible church, which taught the doctrine during Sunday School.

When I could not get the doctrine to agree with my Bible, I started looking at the old commentaries.
I was shocked to discover John Nelson Darby brought the doctrine to the U.S. about the time of the Civil War. Later it was incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and spread like a virus through the evangelical Church in America. These are historical facts, not denied by Bible historians.

The greatest error of the doctrine is the claim that God did not fulfill His promises to the Jewish people through the sacrifice of His Son at Calvary. This claim is found in black and white in the video I produced for YouTube titled "Genesis of Dispensational Theology".


Classic Dispensationalists believe God will again go back to dealing with the modern nation of Israel after the end of the “Church Age”. They claim the Church is a “parenthesis” in God’s dealings with the nation of Israel.


Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church.



“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.”

Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107.


Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.”

Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323.


John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated…


"...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.”

John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25

...........................................................................

The comments above from the professors at Dallas Theological Seminary fall apart below.
How many peoples of God are found in the verse below?

Joh 10:16 And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.


...........................................

Former Dispensationalist Jerry Johnson:

.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Spiritual Jew
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,417
575
58
Mount Morris
✟148,028.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Classic Dispensationalists believe God will again go back to dealing with the modern nation of Israel after the end of the “Church Age”. They claim the Church is a “parenthesis” in God’s dealings with the nation of Israel.
The church is a parenthetical between the first and second coming, and when Christ is on earth, He claims He only deals with His chosen people, the descendants of Jacob, Israel. Unless others come to Him, His people will always be His primary concern when walking around on this earth.

And you claim God does not know a "true" Israelite. God is all knowing, it is humanity that is in the dark about genealogies. God does not need them, does He?

Can you prove Jesus Christ after His Baptism has walked around on earth more than 7 years? Some claim His Baptism was the end of the 69th week, not His birth or death. Where is the 70th week with Jesus Christ literally ministering for 7 literal years? How can the first 483 years be literal, and the last 7 be only symbolic?
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟916,165.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
God is all knowing, it is humanity that is in the dark about genealogies.

Either the Apostle Paul is confused below, or you are confused.


1Ti_1:4 Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do.


Tit_3:9 But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain.


.
 
Upvote 0

Freedm

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2020
740
173
43
Austin TX
✟47,897.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
That depends upon the style of government that is currently in office. In places like China or Russia it is conceivable that such things could happen.
It could just as easily happen in the U.S. of A if the democrats come to power. They do not tolerate dissent and have no problem forcing their views (or anything else) on other people, stripping them of their freedoms.

I'm not 100% on the current laws in the U.S. but I live in Alberta Canada and in our province the government has had the ability to force vaccinate since 1912. It's always been on the books, in the case of a medical emergency, but this law has obviously never been used. I suspect most jurisdictions around the world, not just "places like China or Russia" have similar legislation.
 
Upvote 0

Freedm

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2020
740
173
43
Austin TX
✟47,897.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Can governments force you to be vaccinated?

Can they also force you to take a digital tattoo to prove you have been vaccinated?

The following is a debate between Robert Kennedy Jr., who is the son of JFKs brother, and attorney Alan Dershowitz, who recently defended the president against impeachment.

Deshowitz has said the government has a right to hold you down, and plunge a needle into your arm. He is one of the president's lawyers.



Rev 13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
Rev 13:17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
Rev 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

.
I don't believe at this time, the mark of the beast is imminent, though things could change quickly. The reason I say this is because the Bible clearly states that "the whole world will wonder after the beast" and "all inhabitants of the earth will worship the beast". That does not describe today, so I'm not too concerned about any potential vaccines for rona.
 
Upvote 0