Was not the temple a big part of keeping with the feast properly?
The temple was needed for the sacrifices and offerings, but they were done every day, feast or not. The sacrifices and offerings required were fulfilled, but the day and what it foreshadowed remains unless it was fulfilled. We cannot do away with a shadow until the reality comes. The reality of the Passover lamb has come in Yeshua. Therefore, there is no need to continue the shadow of sacrificing a lamb every Passover. The reality of the latter rain of Pentecost has not come yet. Neither has the reality of the Day of Trumpets (Yom Teruah) or the anti-typical Jubilee trumpet on Yom Kippur or the reality of what Sukkot points to. These aspects are yet to be fulfilled which is why Paul, many years after Yeshua ascended to heaven, said the Feasts "ARE" a shadow of thing "TO COME" (Colossians 2:17). They cannot be abolished until the reality comes.
Yes I understand the feast of unleavened bread was the next day on Aviv 15 but that is not the feast Paul was referring to ... It's an assumption bro to think he was referring to the old traditions of freedom from Egypt ...which only impacts Jews ... We Gentiles were not freed from Egypt ...
When a person is grafted into the natural olive tree of Israel, through Messiah Yeshua, he becomes an Israelite. Their God becomes our God, their Messiah becomes our Messiah, their history becomes our history. Jews understand the concept of identity and relationship. So a Jew living today can rightly say, "When
we passed through the Red Sea ...", even though they didn't literally pass through themselves because they weren't alive back then. I am an Israelite through being grafted in. I can rightly say, "When YHWH freed
us from Egypt ...". Even if you choose to believe such an identity with Israel does not exist, we can still look back and remember YHWH's great work of deliverance of Israel from Egypt.
Passover/Unleavened is a memorial of that great deliverance of Israel from Egyptian slavery and our great deliverance from sin. If you choose not to memorialize Israel's freedom from Egyptian slavery, that's your choice. As for me and my house, we will honor the Almighty for all His great works.
No ..the unleaven bread feast Paul was referring to was the bread of Christ body symbolized by the broken bread and shared between the disciples
The Master's Supper is never referred to as a "feast". The fact that it was held on Abib 14 doesn't make it a feast since Abib 14 was not a "feast" either. The "Feast" starts on Abib 15.
we are to accept this unleavened bread which is symbolic for Jesus body for salvation which they partook symbolically on abib 14, the same night they ate the new covenant sedat known as the communion meal ...we are to remember this meal forever and the promises that were made that night for all believers .. John 14
I agree, but we do not partake of the communion meal to the exclusion of the rest of the Feast of Unleavened Bread. We are to literally not eat anything leavened for seven days, neither have leaven in our homes. We are to spiritually not partake of the leaven of malice, sin, hypocrisy, false doctrine for that same seven day period.
But technically the Jews are the ones called to remember the feast .
No, "technically
Israel are the ones called to remember the feast." If all "Christians" are grafted into the natural olive tree of Israel, then they are all Israelites.
We are called to remember what the lord has said and done on abib 14 and arose on the 3rd day and ascended on the 40th day of the counting of the Omer
Why are we called to remember what Yeshua has done, but called to forget what his Father YHWH has done? The fact is, we are called to remember what both have said and done.