I should hate to speculate... or love to, but not here.But Messianics generally reject the interpolation of a pope, for example, into the faith. The rejection of Torah observance is a "later" addition (so we're told). Things of that sort. Beyond that, I can't get into things here.
Words form our frame of thinking. It makes a difference when it comes to how to approach the topic. Should it be approached through Torah or through Philosophy? Should we see משיח as directed related to David and the prophetic vision? Or, should we see Χριστός as a more universal character that is over and above the limited descriptions in the Tanach? That type of thing. Essentially, and I could be wrong on this, it seems that "messiah" is related more to the Jewish people and to the Tanach, while "Christ" is related more to God's eternal redemptive plan. Maybe someone here could tell me if I misunderstand that.
In other words, I would think that "messiah" is more horizontal while "christ" is more vertical.
Honestly, forgive me if that word is made with wicked intent, I neither understand the wordly definition of messiah, nor christ.
I understand that G-d is all, and perfection greets perfection truely and genuinely with love.
Upvote
0