Yes and that text says nothing about "on." Your quote is a demonstration of how they spoke about time. It has nothing to do with the sabbath as the new moon inclusion proves.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes and that text says nothing about "on." Your quote is a demonstration of how they spoke about time. It has nothing to do with the sabbath as the new moon inclusion proves.Not sure what translation that is but the Masoretic specifically says Sabbath to Sabbath.... you have a valid argument for month to month though....
Isaiah 66:23
And it shall come to pass, that from one new moon to another, and from one sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before me, saith the Lord.
No it doesn't. The few following of the discussed referenced verses is very interesting.The reference in those verses you posted about law is not speaking of the Royal Law but of common legal matters. The Greek word used is nomikos which means one learned in the law.... a lawyer.
How you discerned that this passage was negating the Decalogue ie: that the 6th Commandment was not relevant, is beyond me.
No "thus sayeth the Lord" or "it is written" but an obscure verse dealing with contention with lawyers is your defense for ignoring the Law written by God's own finger on tablets of stone.... interesting.
What is codified in the Bible is upheld, I do not ascribe to tradition... you are the one ignoring what Jesus said unfortunately.What the Apostles said is ignored.
You keep your sabbath and I'll keep my Jesus (Matthew 11:28-30).Of course to transgress the Law is to sin.... therefore, why do men not obey the Law so they don't sin against God? Jesus is the spiritual fulfillment of the 4th Commandment but that does not do away with the admonition to keep the 7th day Holy any more than not being in anger towards a brother negates the 6th Commandment to not kill.
The Commandment is simple in it's construction...
-Remember the Sabbath to keep it Holy. (don't do your own pleasure on that day... focus on God and Righteous things.
-Not do any temporal work that could have been done in the other six days.
-Do not allow anyone in your house to do temporal work on the Sabbath.
-Worship God as Creator and contemplate His creation and grow close to Him and receive the blessing He has promised for those that are obedient to Him.
Doesn't seem like a tall order as some would contend. It's not grievous to obey God in this way... rather it is a delight to those that love God.
If I replied in common everyday words you'd only report me. So the deal for me is you do ignore even the words of Jesus as aptly proven by quotes and other posters besides me.What is codified in the Bible is upheld, I do not ascribe to tradition... you are the one ignoring what Jesus said unfortunately.
The sabbath requirement is rescinded as Romans 14 and Colossians 2 point out.OK... show me ONE verse that definitively shows the transference of God Holy day from Sabbath to Sunday.
Do you steal? No? It is because the Commandment says to not steal. This is what Paul taught...Yes the commandment to not steal is fuflfilled in and by Jesus (Luke 24:44). Does that mean we're free to sin? No. Does that mean we keep the law by not sinning? No, John 13:34 and Luke 6:31.
What verses in those two chapters says anything about the 7th day Sabbath, that was Sanctified and Hallowed by Him, being changed?The sabbath requirement is rescinded as Romans 14 and Colossians 2 point out.
You do realize the verse you referenced in Luke 24:44 speaks of the law of Moses but says nothing of the Law of God.Yes the commandment to not steal is fuflfilled in and by Jesus (Luke 24:44). Does that mean we're free to sin? No. Does that mean we keep the law by not sinning? No, John 13:34 and Luke 6:31.
Nobody here is saying the Law imparts righteousness... stop trying to muddy the clear waters of truth.Amen righteousness doesn't come by the law (Galatians 2:21).
If you know the truth and refuse to honour God in it, then yes, that is willful rebellion against God.Yes you have by using 1 John 3:4 out of context. Your argument is if one doesn't keep the law specifically the sabbath they aren't a saved Christian. In-other-words in your view not keeping the sabbath is unrepentant wilful sin proving one isn't a Christian.
Then maybe you should have referenced those instead of scrambling to explain your poorly referenced post. It appears you are lily pad hopping.No it doesn't. The few following of the discussed referenced verses is very interesting.
The new moon in that verse can be understood as monthly which dovetails perfectly with another verse talking about living on the new earth...Yes and that text says nothing about "on." Your quote is a demonstration of how they spoke about time. It has nothing to do with the sabbath as the new moon inclusion proves.
As I have previously stated, Jesus is indeed our spiritual rest... the Sabbath however refers to our temporal rest that God blessed us with to spend dedicated time with Him.You keep your sabbath and I'll keep my Jesus (Matthew 11:28-30).
Good point... the moral law was written by God himself on permanent stone.... the ceremonial law was written by Moses on parchment and was temporary. The tablets of stone were kept inside the ark of the covenant, the scrolls of parchment were kept on the outside. God is about details and this little detail speaks volumes about the difference between the two.Saying that because somebody doesn't practice Sabbath observance according to Jewish or SDA tenets equals disobedience to God seems to be confusing ceremonial with moral law. Frankly, this represents an abandonment of true Christian ethics in favor of legalism.
Speak your mind... with me, you have safe passage for your thoughts on the matter. I am not a SJW who is triggered by reality.If I replied in common everyday words you'd only report me. So the deal for me is you do ignore even the words of Jesus as aptly proven by quotes and other posters besides me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?