• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Infant Baptism?

PreachersWife2004

by his wounds we are healed
Site Supporter
May 15, 2007
38,620
4,181
51
Land O' 10,000 Lakes
✟106,590.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
There's also zero evidence in the bible that says babies weren't baptized. John 3:16 doesn't say "All those over a certain age who believe and are baptized will be saved and any under a certain age are saved automatically".

Those passages don't automatically assume that ALL children believe in Jesus. They just talk about the children that do. I know more than a few kids who have never heard of Jesus.
 
Upvote 0

thankfulttt

Member
Oct 26, 2014
466
42
✟26,502.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
There's also zero evidence in the bible that says babies weren't baptized. John 3:16 doesn't say "All those over a certain age who believe and are baptized will be saved and any under a certain age are saved automatically".

Those passages don't automatically assume that ALL children believe in Jesus. They just talk about the children that do. I know more than a few kids who have never heard of Jesus.

There are three major forms of Baptism in the Bible.

1. Baptism of repentance. Man is the baptizer, water is the mode, and it is unto repentance.

2. Baptism of Jesus. Jesus is the baptizer, fire is the mode, and it is with gifts of the Holy Spirit.

3. Baptism into Christ. The Holy Spirit is the baptizer, conversion (or the new birth)is the result, and it is for eternal life.
 
Upvote 0

thankfulttt

Member
Oct 26, 2014
466
42
✟26,502.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
There is one verse in the Bible that has a requirement for water baptism, and that requirement was believing with your whole heart.


Act 8:37 And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.
 
Upvote 0

PreachersWife2004

by his wounds we are healed
Site Supporter
May 15, 2007
38,620
4,181
51
Land O' 10,000 Lakes
✟106,590.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
There is only one baptism. It is done in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.

We believe in baptizing babies because it's scriptural. We do so because they have a need for forgiveness (Psalm 51:5), they too are included in the command to baptize “all nations” (Matthew 28:19-20), and they can believe through the power of the Holy Spirit (Matthew 18:6; Luke 18:15-17).

If you say that only those who can declare their belief vocally can be baptized, what do you do about those who cannot?
 
Upvote 0

thankfulttt

Member
Oct 26, 2014
466
42
✟26,502.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
There is only one baptism. It is done in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.

We believe in baptizing babies because it's scriptural. We do so because they have a need for forgiveness (Psalm 51:5), they too are included in the command to baptize “all nations” (Matthew 28:19-20), and they can believe through the power of the Holy Spirit (Matthew 18:6; Luke 18:15-17).

If you say that only those who can declare their belief vocally can be baptized, what do you do about those who cannot?

If there is only one baptism what do you do with this verse?

Mat 3:11 I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire:

When we lump the different types of baptism as one we bring confusion. If water baptism saves, and we know that the disciples were baptized with water, what did Jesus mean when he said to Peter, "When thou art converted---"? (Luke 22:32)
 
Upvote 0

PreachersWife2004

by his wounds we are healed
Site Supporter
May 15, 2007
38,620
4,181
51
Land O' 10,000 Lakes
✟106,590.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
If there is only one baptism what do you do with this verse?

Mat 3:11 I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire:

This doesn't refer to two different baptisms. It just refers to Jesus being more powerful than John the Baptist - which is the ENTIRE point of his statement. It's not really about the baptism, it's about the power difference.

I'm getting the sense that you don't believe the Holy Spirit is present during a water baptism. If that's the case, I do feel sorry for you.

When we lump the different types of baptism as one we bring confusion. If water baptism saves, and we know that the disciples were baptized with water, what did Jesus mean when he said to Peter, "When thou art converted---"? (Luke 22:32)

There is only one baptism. Saying otherwise actually goes against the SoF of this site, too, as we cling to the Nicene Creed:

I acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins**. (Ephesians 4:5; Acts 2:38) The asterisks don't pertain here, but I will list why they are there for clarification: **May be interpreted as baptism is a matter of obedience and not a requirement for salvation or as a regenerating ordinance.

As to what Jesus said to Peter, he wasn't talking about being converted in the modern sense that we view being converted. Peter, at this time, was unknowingly subverting Jesus. It's why he says "get thee behind me, Satan" to him. Has nothing to do with baptism whatsoever.
 
Upvote 0

thankfulttt

Member
Oct 26, 2014
466
42
✟26,502.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
This doesn't refer to two different baptisms. It just refers to Jesus being more powerful than John the Baptist - which is the ENTIRE point of his statement. It's not really about the baptism, it's about the power difference.

I'm getting the sense that you don't believe the Holy Spirit is present during a water baptism. If that's the case, I do feel sorry for you.



There is only one baptism. Saying otherwise actually goes against the SoF of this site, too, as we cling to the Nicene Creed:

I acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins**. (Ephesians 4:5; Acts 2:38) The asterisks don't pertain here, but I will list why they are there for clarification: **May be interpreted as baptism is a matter of obedience and not a requirement for salvation or as a regenerating ordinance.

As to what Jesus said to Peter, he wasn't talking about being converted in the modern sense that we view being converted. Peter, at this time, was unknowingly subverting Jesus. It's why he says "get thee behind me, Satan" to him. Has nothing to do with baptism whatsoever.
If there isn't more than one baptism how do you answer this verse?

Act 11:16Then remembered I the word of the Lord, how that he said, John indeed baptized G907 with water; but ye shall be baptized G907 with the Holy Ghost.

I agree that there is only one baptism that saves. 1Co 12:13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.

The Spirit baptizes us into the body of Christ when we are born again.

Saying that you feel sorry for me is not the spirit in which I feel comfortable in.
 
Upvote 0

PreachersWife2004

by his wounds we are healed
Site Supporter
May 15, 2007
38,620
4,181
51
Land O' 10,000 Lakes
✟106,590.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
If there isn't more than one baptism how do you answer this verse?

Act 11:16Then remembered I the word of the Lord, how that he said, John indeed baptized G907 with water; but ye shall be baptized G907 with the Holy Ghost.

I agree that there is only one baptism that saves. 1Co 12:13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.

The Spirit baptizes us into the body of Christ when we are born again.

Saying that you feel sorry for me is not the spirit in which I feel comfortable in.

There isn't two baptisms. We're not baptized once with water and then once again with the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is already working in us through the water baptism. The passages about John the Baptist, again, are not referring to baptism itself, but the power structure where John doesn't possess the abilities that Jesus does. Even he recognizes this.

I feel sorry for any whose doctrine seems to run contrary to scripture. If you feel your doctrine does not run contrary to scripture, then whether I think it does or not should be of little consequence to you. This is, after all, the Christian Apologetics section, where people are generally defending their beliefs one way or the other.

I was also trying to warn you about inadvertently posting against the site's SoF.
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,545
29,069
Pacific Northwest
✟813,591.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
If there is only one baptism what do you do with this verse?

Mat 3:11 I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire:

I would recommend reading the Acts of the Apostles, and notice that the "baptism with the Holy Spirit" applies to what happened on Pentecost. That is, it was an historic event, not a personal experience.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,545
29,069
Pacific Northwest
✟813,591.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
There are three major forms of Baptism in the Bible.

1. Baptism of repentance. Man is the baptizer, water is the mode, and it is unto repentance.

2. Baptism of Jesus. Jesus is the baptizer, fire is the mode, and it is with gifts of the Holy Spirit.

3. Baptism into Christ. The Holy Spirit is the baptizer, conversion (or the new birth)is the result, and it is for eternal life.


You seem to be confusing a couple things up with 1 and 3. I've already addressed 2 in my previous post.

The "baptism of repentance" refers to what John the Baptist was doing. If you need a moment to go through your Bible to double check what I'm saying, feel free. But that isn't Christian Baptism, Christian Baptism is very much involves water, and it is "into Christ". This is what Scripture consistently speaks of as Baptism. Again, if you need a moment to go through your Bible to double check what I'm saying, feel free to do so.

Here's what you won't find in Scripture though, "Baptism into Christ. the Holy Spirit is the baptizer, conversion is the result, and it is for eternal life" you won't find this in Scripture, what you will find is that normal, actual Baptism does what the text says it does, and you can read about it in Acts 2:38, Romans ch. 6, Colossians ch 2, 1 Peter 3:21, and many other places. Again, feel free to check what I'm saying with your Bible.

-cryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

Strong in Him

Great is thy faithfulness
Site Supporter
Mar 4, 2005
30,881
9,870
NW England
✟1,287,788.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Psalm 51:5 (David)

Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity,
And in sin my mother conceived me.

Yet the same man, David, also wrote, "you have knit me together in my mother's womb." Psalms 139:13
So was he saying that God, who is loving, holy and perfect and who created us, created us as sinners? Can a perfect God make something sinful, or in sin?

The two are not mutually exclusive. So is David in error?

No.
But in Psalm 51 he was remorseful, ashamed, repentant and probably feeling quite wretched. Haven't you ever felt like that and said, "I can't do anything right; I'm just an awful person. I wonder why God bothers with me", or anything like that? Another day you might say, "thank you Lord for your creation, for giving me life, saving me and allowing me to serve you."

The former of those statements is "correct" because it reflects your mood at the time; the way you feel about yourself". The latter of those statements is correct and always will be.
 
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,812
1,921
✟989,707.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
There's also zero evidence in the bible that says babies weren't baptized. John 3:16 doesn't say "All those over a certain age who believe and are baptized will be saved and any under a certain age are saved automatically".

Those passages don't automatically assume that ALL children believe in Jesus. They just talk about the children that do. I know more than a few kids who have never heard of Jesus.

There is also zero evidence in the Bible that says: “Babies were baptized”, so that is not good evidence for either side.

Water baptism is not a “requirement” for salvation since God does the saving, but is something Christians get to do in order to help them.

Are you suggesting new born babies are hell bound and thus need water baptism to save them?

I know that I needed everything God could provide to assure me of my conversion, both outwardly and mentally. God wants you to physically feel the experience of what is going on Spiritually.

You might need to add to your conversion a definite time place and physical experience, which God has provided for you. We talk about being “Born again”, which comes from Nicodemus encounter with Christ (John 3 :1-21):


Being “born again” is what Jesus told Nicodemus he need to do. This requires some thuoght, because Jesus does not address the questions or comments that are verbalized, but directs His comments to the persons next step in their personal spiritual development (what is on their heart spiritually). Jesus is not making some general philosophical statement (like Buddha might make) but is always addressing the audience He is talking to. We have to get into the context.

What did Nicodemus need to do next in his spiritual development?

What does Nicodemus need to be doing next? (study the Old Testament, become one of the followers of Jesus right then and there, Confess, repent, etc.)

The first thing Nicodemus might do at least is what he already knows he should do? Is that not where you would start? So what is that?

Since Nicodemus is still part of the Sanhedrin, he would not have been immersed baptized by John’s baptism. That would have got him thrown out of the Sanhedrin.

John’s baptism would have been a hot topic among the religious scholars, yet the answer was obvious and they all knew it (remember Jesus using it against them and causing them to quit asking him questions?)

Jesus is not going to hand out the answer to Nicodemus, since Nicodemus knows the answer, but he will make Nicodemus think about it hard, since it would already be on his mind.



Christian water baptism as seen in scripture: Is always adult (there are only two examples that “might include infants” but nothing definite, all the others are adult believers) water immersion to be a physical outward representation of what had or is happening spiritually in the person being baptized. It is mainly to help the individual being baptized to better grasp what is going on, but it can “witness” to others observing the baptism. It has the elements of going down under the water (burying the old man), placing your dependence in another; the person baptizing you (surrendering your life to God), being washed (having your sins washed away), rising out of the water (rising from the old dead body), and stepping forth out onto the earth (a new person). The person is walking out into the hugs of his new family. It is also a sign of your humility, since it is a humbling act anyone can simple allow someone to do to them (so not a work) and since humility has been shown in the accept of charity (God’s free gift of undeserving forgiveness) it should just support and add to the memory of that acceptance. To refuse Christian water baptism when it is readily available might mean you are not ready to handle other responsibility like having the indwelling Holy Spirit and you are hurting yourself.


The Western “Christian” Churches are all over the board, but other countries experiencing sever persecution of Christians (Underground churches: China, Southeast Asia, some of India, Iran) are for as far as I can see consistently requiring adult believer immersion baptism. These churches are growing rapidly (estimated at 100 million+ in China).


Is the real problem with humility, since adult water baptism is a humbling act?

Is the problem with “witnessing” since baptism help other Christians remember what they went through?

The whole “argument” about the “one” baptism having to be “spiritual baptism” so we do not need to (or even shouldn’t) be water immersed is not supported by scriptural examples, since everyone that was “baptized” by the Holy Spirit seems to have also been water baptized.

In an effort to emphasis God’s unconditional (salvation), water baptism of believers has been avoided as a subject. People have “argued” that water baptism is a work and since “works” are not required for salvation, water baptism must be avoided. Most “Christian” religious groups “allow” immersion of believers if they want it.

The problem with this reasoning is adult believer immersion is not something you “do” (work), but is something you allow to be done to you. It is not something “done” as some requirement, but is something you get to do for your sake (to help you) and the sake of others.
 
Upvote 0

PreachersWife2004

by his wounds we are healed
Site Supporter
May 15, 2007
38,620
4,181
51
Land O' 10,000 Lakes
✟106,590.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
i don't need a personal "event" to know I'm saved. Jesus dying on the cross is enough. I've been a redeemed Christian since the day I was baptized, as an infant, because it's not anything I do or did, it's what the Holy Spirit did in me.
 
Upvote 0

PreachersWife2004

by his wounds we are healed
Site Supporter
May 15, 2007
38,620
4,181
51
Land O' 10,000 Lakes
✟106,590.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
"indoctrinate them while they are young for maximized succes of brainwashing"?

Oh, kinda like public schools?

You're on thin ice, Dogma. I'd tread carefully if I was you.
 
Upvote 0

DogmaHunter

Code Monkey
Jan 26, 2014
16,757
8,531
Antwerp
✟158,395.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Oh, kinda like public schools?

No. Schools are about education, not indoctrination.

You're on thin ice, Dogma. I'd tread carefully if I was you.

Sorry, it was too easy and couldn't help myself. :p
However, it is kinda true, isn't it...

It's far easier to have a child believe the claims of a religion, then an educated adult. Children have a tendency to not ask question and simply accept whatever they are told by what they perceive as "trusted authorities", like their parents.

It's not at all surprising to me that most, if not all, religions never take the stance of "let's wait till people are educated and developed enough so that they can be reasoned into the faith".

Instead, you are born and then immediatly labeled a "christian child". And even before you can properly open your eyes, you get baptised.
 
Upvote 0

Strong in Him

Great is thy faithfulness
Site Supporter
Mar 4, 2005
30,881
9,870
NW England
✟1,287,788.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
However, it is kinda true, isn't it...

It's far easier to have a child believe the claims of a religion, then an educated adult. Children have a tendency to not ask question and simply accept whatever they are told by what they perceive as "trusted authorities", like their parents.

Maybe. But little children become teenagers, who may question/rebel against the faith, if only because their parents hold it. There's no guarantee that a child who is taken to Sunday school will accept the Christian faith, and do so for the rest of its life.
Apart from which, Christianity is a relationship with God, not an academic belief.

It's not at all surprising to me that most, if not all, religions never take the stance of "let's wait till people are educated and developed enough so that they can be reasoned into the faith".

Were you provided with a list of reasons why you should trust, and love, your parents? Or given a thesis to read on the benefits for being part of a family?
Or did your parents wait until you had acquired debating skills and then put the proposition to you that you should go to school?

Instead, you are born and then immediatly labeled a "christian child". And even before you can properly open your eyes, you get baptised.

1) You shouldn't be. Being born in a "Christian" country does not make someone a Christian nor guarantee that they will become one later in life. Any more than being born in McDonald's would mean you grow up to be a carnivore. My 2 oldest cousins were baptised automatically, as babies, even though their parents didn't believe in what they were doing. Now they are humanists, not Christians.
2) Children aren't automatically baptised when they are babies - some are toddlers or older. Some aren't baptised at all.
I must admit that, for some, baptism is a ritual; even a superstition. "Let's get her baptised so she will go to heaven if anything happens to us" (false). Or "if we get him baptised, he can wear the family heirloom and it will be a good reason to invite the cousins down," (not necessary, you can have a service of thanksgiving and family party without a baptism.)
3) I can understand the implication that children aren't old enough to decide if they want to be baptised, if that's what you're saying; but parents don't ask their children if they want to have vaccinations, learn to read, go to school, have a baby brother or sister or dozens of other things.

Christian parents who know that God is their heavenly Father, can trust him and have the joy and peace that comes from living a life with him, want that for their children too, because they want what is best for them. They can't force their child to accept their beliefs, they may adopt their own faith when older, or none at all. but they can give them what they believe to be the best start. Just as parents who are vegetarians and/or vegans might bring their child up to eat no meat at all, or some parents may decide that their kids will not grow up addicted to tv and so they don't have one in the house. Some of us may look at them and think, "what a shame, the kids are missing out, there's nothing wrong with burgers" or whatever, but those parents are doing what they feel is best for their children. I dare say there are also atheist parents who think "I'm not having my child indoctrinated with those myths", and so decide that their kids will not go to Sunday school.
 
Upvote 0

PreachersWife2004

by his wounds we are healed
Site Supporter
May 15, 2007
38,620
4,181
51
Land O' 10,000 Lakes
✟106,590.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
No. Schools are about education, not indoctrination.

And baptism is about faith, not about indoctrination.

Sorry, it was too easy and couldn't help myself. :p
However, it is kinda true, isn't it...

It's far easier to have a child believe the claims of a religion, then an educated adult. Children have a tendency to not ask question and simply accept whatever they are told by what they perceive as "trusted authorities", like their parents.

It's not at all surprising to me that most, if not all, religions never take the stance of "let's wait till people are educated and developed enough so that they can be reasoned into the faith".

Instead, you are born and then immediatly labeled a "christian child". And even before you can properly open your eyes, you get baptised.

Pfft.

Baptism doesn't force someone to stay a Christian.
 
Upvote 0

DogmaHunter

Code Monkey
Jan 26, 2014
16,757
8,531
Antwerp
✟158,395.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Maybe. But little children become teenagers, who may question/rebel against the faith, if only because their parents hold it. There's no guarantee that a child who is taken to Sunday school will accept the Christian faith, and do so for the rest of its life.

Sure. But that doesn't address the point being made.
It's very hard to "unlearn" a religion that's been spoonfed to you all throughout your childhood. In the same way, it is very hard to "learn" a religion when you had a secular education and when religion simply wasn't a part of your upbringing.

Were you provided with a list of reasons why you should trust, and love, your parents?

It's instinctive trust and love.
It's so engrained into your biology, that even people who suffered abused at the hands of their parents, find it hard at times to break all ties.

1) You shouldn't be. Being born in a "Christian" country does not make someone a Christian nor guarantee that they will become one later in life.

I actually didn't speak about countries. I spoke of families. The overwhelmingly vast majority of theists, practices the religion of the people they were raised by.


My 2 oldest cousins were baptised automatically, as babies, even though their parents didn't believe in what they were doing. Now they are humanists, not christians.

Yeah, that's what I call "cultural baptisms". A lot of my non-religious friends also baptise their kids. And that's about the only time they ever enter a church. They just do it to please their grand parents or something similar.

That's not really the same as what I was talking about.
Eventhough these children get baptised, they do not get a religious upbringing. Religion is not a part of their daily life.

2) Children aren't automatically baptised when they are babies - some are toddlers or older. Some aren't baptised at all.
I must admit that, for some, baptism is a ritual; even a superstition. "Let's get her baptised so she will go to heaven if anything happens to us" (false). Or "if we get him baptised, he can wear the family heirloom and it will be a good reason to invite the cousins down," (not necessary, you can have a service of thanksgiving and family party without a baptism.)

I think this is a specific belief of your specific denomination. Right?
Because catholics don't think like that at all. As far as catholics are concerned, babtism is the "solution" for original sin in children.

3) I can understand the implication that children aren't old enough to decide if they want to be baptised, if that's what you're saying; but parents don't ask their children if they want to have vaccinations, learn to read, go to school, have a baby brother or sister or dozens of other things.

I find it amazing that you consider these things to be equal to religious indoctrination...

Christian parents who know that God is their heavenly Father, can trust him and have the joy and peace that comes from living a life with him, want that for their children too, because they want what is best for them. They can't force their child to accept their beliefs, they may adopt their own faith when older, or none at all. but they can give them what they believe to be the best start. Just as parents who are vegetarians and/or vegans might bring their child up to eat no meat at all, or some parents may decide that their kids will not grow up addicted to tv and so they don't have one in the house. Some of us may look at them and think, "what a shame, the kids are missing out, there's nothing wrong with burgers" or whatever, but those parents are doing what they feel is best for their children. I dare say there are also atheist parents who think "I'm not having my child indoctrinated with those myths", and so decide that their kids will not go to Sunday school.

Here's the difference....

If I don't tell my children about gravity - they'll still find out about it.
If I don't tell them about gods - they won't.
Just like if I don't tell them about santa claus, they'll never buy into it.

No, educating your child is NOT the same as indoctrinating them in a faith-based doctrine.
 
Upvote 0