True or false, the point I'm making is quite clear; is it not?
You don't care that your point is based on a falsehood?
Hmmm... I guess you wouldn't, just as long as it was yours.
But it does raise an interesting theological question: all those people -- thousands, maybe millions -- faced with disaster, catastrophe, and suffering beyond anything they could have ever imagined; some of them may choose to pray to whatever god they may believe in for assistance.
Those that pray to the "wrong" god die and, of course, face an eternity of hell and damnation (actually, they wouldn't, since the OT has no concept of hell, but that's another matter). Those who pray to the "right" God,
completely unaware that He is the one directly and deliberately inflicting this suffering on them,will die, and be brought into His presence.
So, what happens to the ones who make it up there and ask, "God, how did that Flood happen?" Won't they be a little upset to know that God killed them just to get their last minute worship?
You see, AV -- your problem (one of many, but this isn't the time to go into all of your flaws) is that you're imposing NT ideology on an OT myth. You're assuming that God wanted to save everybody, when the simple truth of it is, He did not. The OT God is a tribal God, who has no interest whatsoever in the lives or well-being of those who are not His "chosen" people.
Just ask the Egyptians, the Amalekites, the Canaanites, the Midianites, the Gibeonites, the Elgonites, the Hebronites, the Philistines, the Edomites, or any of the others who were not "His" people -- oh, wait. They're all dead; killed either by God himself or by those acting under His direct orders.
That sound like a God who wanted people to repent -- or are you confusing him with the Warm Fuzzy Jesus of the new Testament?